In Vivo Biocompatibility Analysis of a Novel Barrier Membrane Based on Bovine Dermis-Derived Collagen for Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR)

被引:12
|
作者
Lindner, Carolin [1 ]
Alkildani, Said [1 ]
Stojanovic, Sanja [2 ,3 ]
Najman, Stevo [2 ,3 ]
Jung, Ole [4 ]
Barbeck, Mike [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] BerlinAnalytix GmbH, D-12109 Berlin, Germany
[2] Univ Nis, Fac Med, Dept Cell & Tissue Engn, Nish 18000, Serbia
[3] Univ Nis, Fac Med, Dept Biol & Human Genet, Nish 18000, Serbia
[4] Univ Med Ctr Rostock, Clin & Policlin Dermatol & Venereol, D-18057 Rostock, Germany
关键词
bovine collagen; resorbable barrier membrane; Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR); biodegradation; biomaterial scoring; DIN EN ISO 10993; immune response; macrophages; transmembraneous vascularization; MULTINUCLEATED GIANT-CELLS; IMPLANTATION BED; PORCINE DERMIS; WOUND REPAIR; CROSS-LINK; AUGMENTATION; INTEGRATION; VASCULARIZATION; BIODEGRADATION; PROLIFERATION;
D O I
10.3390/membranes12040378
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Collagen-based barrier membranes are nowadays the prevalent option for Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) procedures. Xenogeneic collagen is highly biocompatible as it shares a similar structure to native human collagen, which prevents it from eliciting an exaggerated host immune response. Most commercially available collagen barrier membranes are porcine-derived, while bovine-derived alternatives are still rarely available. The aim of the present study was to investigate the tissue responses and the barrier functionality of a novel GBR membrane composed of bovine collagen type I (BM). Therefore, the subcutaneous implantation model in Wistar rats was performed to compare the novel medical device with two already clinically used native porcine-based barrier membranes, i.e., Jason (R) membrane (JM) and Bio-Gide (R) (BG), at 10-, 30-, 60-, and 90-days post implantationem. Histochemical and immunohistochemical stains were used for histopathological evaluation including a biocompatibility scoring according to the DIN EN ISO 10993-6 norm as well as histomorphometrical analyses of the occurrence of M1 and M2 macrophages and the transmembraneous vascularization. The bovine membrane exhibited a host tissue reaction that was comparable to both control materials, which was verified by the scoring results and the histomorphometrical macrophage measurements. Moreover, the novel membrane exhibited an integration pattern without material fragmentation up to day 60. At day 90, material fragmentation was observable that allowed for "secondary porosity" including transmembrane vascularization. The results of this study suggest that the novel bovine barrier membrane is fully biocompatible and suitable for indications that require GBR as a suitable alternative to porcine-sourced barrier membranes.
引用
收藏
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Asymmetric resorbable-based dental barrier membrane for periodontal guided tissue regeneration and guided bone regeneration: A review
    Bee, Soo-Ling
    Hamid, Zuratul Ain Abdul
    JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH PART B-APPLIED BIOMATERIALS, 2022, 110 (09) : 2157 - 2182
  • [32] In Vitro Biocompatibility of a Novel Semi-Rigid Shell Barrier System: As a New Application for Guided Bone Regeneration
    Tunthasen, Rudjit
    Pripatnanont, Prisana
    Meesane, Jirut
    POLYMERS, 2022, 14 (12)
  • [33] Surface characteristics and in vitro biocompatibility of surface-modified titanium foils as a regenerative barrier membrane for guided bone regeneration
    An, Hyun-Wook
    Lee, Jaesik
    Park, Jin-Woo
    JOURNAL OF BIOMATERIALS APPLICATIONS, 2023, 37 (07) : 1228 - 1242
  • [34] In Vitro and In Vivo Biocompatibility Analysis of a New Transparent Collagen-based Wound Membrane for Tissue Regeneration in Different Clinical Indications
    Jung, Ole
    Radenkovic, Milena
    Stojanovic, Sanja
    Lindner, Caroline
    Batinic, Milijana
    Goerke, Oliver
    Pissarek, Jens
    Proehl, Annica
    Najman, Stevo
    Barbeck, Mike
    IN VIVO, 2020, 34 (05): : 2287 - 2295
  • [35] Morphogenetically-Active Barrier Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration, Based on Amorphous Polyphosphate
    Wang, Xiaohong
    Ackermann, Maximilian
    Neufurth, Meik
    Wang, Shunfeng
    Schroeder, Heinz C.
    Mueller, Werner E. G.
    MARINE DRUGS, 2017, 15 (05):
  • [36] Improving Bone Formation by Guided Bone Regeneration Using a Collagen Membrane with rhBMP-2: A Novel Concept
    Jung, Narae
    Park, Jaehan
    Park, Sang-Hyun
    Oh, Seunghan
    Kim, Sungtae
    Cho, Sung-Won
    Kim, Jong-Eun
    Moon, Hong Seok
    Park, Young-Bum
    JOURNAL OF FUNCTIONAL BIOMATERIALS, 2023, 14 (03)
  • [37] Investigating the Potential of Amnion-Based Scaffolds as a Barrier Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration
    Li, Wuwei
    Ma, Guowu
    Brazile, Bryn
    Li, Nan
    Dai, Wei
    Butler, J. Ryan
    Claude, Andrew A.
    Wertheim, Jason A.
    Liao, Jun
    Wang, Bo
    LANGMUIR, 2015, 31 (31) : 8642 - 8653
  • [38] Contour changes after guided bone regeneration of large non-contained mandibular buccal bone defects using deproteinized bovine bone mineral and a porcine-derived collagen membrane: an experimental in vivo investigation
    I. Sanz-Martin
    L. Ferrantino
    F. Vignoletti
    J. Nuñez
    N. Baldini
    M. Duvina
    J. Alcaraz
    M. Sanz
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 2018, 22 : 1273 - 1283
  • [39] Contour changes after guided bone regeneration of large non-contained mandibular buccal bone defects using deproteinized bovine bone mineral and a porcine-derived collagen membrane: an experimental in vivo investigation
    Sanz-Martin, I.
    Ferrantino, L.
    Vignoletti, F.
    Nunez, J.
    Baldini, N.
    Duvina, M.
    Alcaraz, J.
    Sanz, M.
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2018, 22 (03) : 1273 - 1283
  • [40] Biocompatibility and osteogenic activity of guided bone regeneration membrane based on chitosan-coated magnesium alloy
    Guo, Yu
    Yu, Yanjun
    Han, Liping
    Ma, Shanshan
    Zhao, Jinghui
    Chen, Huimin
    Yang, Zukun
    Zhang, Feimin
    Xia, Yang
    Zhou, Yanmin
    MATERIALS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING C-MATERIALS FOR BIOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2019, 100 : 226 - 235