Useful island block geometries of a passive intensity modulator used for intensity-modulated bolus electron conformal therapy

被引:4
|
作者
Chambers, Erin L. [1 ]
Carver, Robert L. [1 ,2 ]
Hogstrom, Kenneth R. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Louisiana State Univ, Dept Phys & Astron, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA
[2] Mary Bird Perkins Canc Ctr, Baton Rouge, LA 70809 USA
来源
关键词
electron therapy; intensity modulation; bolus; conformal therapy; BEAM REDEFINITION ALGORITHM; DOSE CALCULATIONS; DESIGN; POSTMASTECTOMY; DOSIMETRY;
D O I
10.1002/acm2.13079
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose This project determined the range of island block geometric configurations useful for the clinical utilization of intensity-modulated bolus electron conformal therapy (IM-BECT). Methods Multiple half-beam island block geometries were studied for seven electron energies 7-20 MeV at 100 and 103 cm source-to-surface distance (SSD). We studied relative fluence distributions at 0.5 cm and 2.0 cm depths in water, resulting in 28 unique beam conditions. For each beam condition, we studied intensity reduction factor (IRF) values of 0.70, 0.75, 0.80, 0.85, 0.90, and 0.95, and hexagonal packing separations for the island blocks of 0.50, 0.75, 1.00, 1.25, and 1.50 cm, that is, 30 unique IM configurations and 840 unique beam-IM combinations. A combination was deemed acceptable if the average intensity downstream of the intensity modulator agreed within 2% of that intended and the variation in fluence was less than +/- 2%. Results For 100 cm SSD, and for 0.5 cm depth, results showed that beam energies above 13 MeV did not exhibit sufficient scatter to produce clinically acceptable fluence (intensity) distributions for all IRF values (0.70-0.95). In particular, 20 MeV fluence distributions were unacceptable for any values, and acceptable 16 MeV fluence distributions were limited to a minimum IRF of 0.85. For the 2.0 cm depth, beam energies up to and including 20 MeV had acceptable fluence distributions. For 103 cm SSD and for 0.5 cm and 2.0 cm depths, results showed that all beam energies (7-20 MeV) had clinically acceptable fluence distributions for all IRF values (0.70-0.95). In general, the more clinically likely 103 cm SSD had acceptable fluence distributions with larger separations (r), which allow larger block diameters. Conclusion The geometric operating range of island block separations and IRF values (block diameters) producing clinically appropriate IM electron beams has been determined.
引用
收藏
页码:131 / 145
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Original Knee Fixation Device as a Useful Fixation Method during Prostate Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy
    Kuga, Noriyuki
    Shirieda, Katsutoshi
    Sato, Yuta
    Shimotabira, Haruhiko
    Kurogi, Yusuke
    Jinnouchi, Takashi
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 47 (01) : 79 - 85
  • [42] Recurrence pattern of glioblastoma treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy versus three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy
    Mun, So Hwa
    Jang, Hong Seok
    Choi, Byung Ok
    Kim, Shin Woo
    Song, Jin-Ho
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY JOURNAL, 2024, 42 (03): : 218 - 227
  • [43] VOLUMETRIC MODULATED ARC THERAPY FOR DELIVERY OF PROSTATE RADIOTHERAPY: COMPARISON WITH INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY AND THREE-DIMENSIONAL CONFORMAL RADIOTHERAPY
    Palma, David
    Vollans, Emily
    James, Kerry
    Nakano, Sandy
    Moiseenko, Vitali
    Shaffer, Richard
    Mckenzie, Michael
    Morris, James
    Otto, Karl
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2008, 72 (04): : 996 - 1001
  • [44] Minimising contralateral breast dose in post-mastectomy intensity-modulated radiotherapy by incorporating conformal electron irradiation
    van der Laan, Hans Paul
    Korevaar, Erik W.
    Dolsma, Wil V.
    Maduro, John H.
    Langendijk, Johannes A.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2010, 94 (02) : 235 - 240
  • [45] Dosimetric effect of Elekta Beam Modulator micromultileaf in three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer
    Carosi, Alessandra
    Ingrosso, Gianluca
    Ponti, Elisabetta
    Tolu, Barbara
    Murgia, Alessandra
    di Cristino, Daniela
    Santoni, Riccardo
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2014, 39 (02) : 180 - 184
  • [46] A Treatment Planning Comparison of Passive-Scattering and Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy for Typical Tumor Sites
    Kase, Yuki
    Yamashita, Haruo
    Fuji, Hiroshi
    Yamamoto, Yuichi
    Pu, Yuehu
    Tsukishima, Chihiro
    Murayama, Shigeyuki
    JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2012, 53 (02) : 272 - 280
  • [47] Optimization of intensity-modulated very high energy (50-250 MeV) electron therapy
    Yeboah, C
    Sandison, GA
    Moskvin, V
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2002, 47 (08): : 1285 - 1301
  • [48] VOLUMETRIC INTENSITY-MODULATED ARC THERAPY FOR PRIMARY HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA: COMPARISON WITH 3D CONFORMAL RADIOTHERAPY
    Lee, S. H.
    Lee, K. C.
    Lee, S. H.
    Seong, K. H.
    Choi, J.
    Kim, H. Y.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2012, 23 : 162 - 162
  • [49] Intensity-modulated conformal radiation therapy in head and neck cancer. Treatment and associated quality control protocol
    Marchesi, V
    Lapeyre, M
    Aletti, P
    Graff, P
    Mege, A
    Noel, A
    Marchal, C
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2004, 73 : S413 - S413
  • [50] Breast-conserving radiation therapy using combined electron and intensity-modulated radiotherapy technique
    Li, JG
    Williams, SS
    Goffinet, DR
    Boyer, AL
    Xing, L
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2000, 56 (01) : 65 - 71