Useful island block geometries of a passive intensity modulator used for intensity-modulated bolus electron conformal therapy

被引:4
|
作者
Chambers, Erin L. [1 ]
Carver, Robert L. [1 ,2 ]
Hogstrom, Kenneth R. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Louisiana State Univ, Dept Phys & Astron, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA
[2] Mary Bird Perkins Canc Ctr, Baton Rouge, LA 70809 USA
来源
关键词
electron therapy; intensity modulation; bolus; conformal therapy; BEAM REDEFINITION ALGORITHM; DOSE CALCULATIONS; DESIGN; POSTMASTECTOMY; DOSIMETRY;
D O I
10.1002/acm2.13079
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose This project determined the range of island block geometric configurations useful for the clinical utilization of intensity-modulated bolus electron conformal therapy (IM-BECT). Methods Multiple half-beam island block geometries were studied for seven electron energies 7-20 MeV at 100 and 103 cm source-to-surface distance (SSD). We studied relative fluence distributions at 0.5 cm and 2.0 cm depths in water, resulting in 28 unique beam conditions. For each beam condition, we studied intensity reduction factor (IRF) values of 0.70, 0.75, 0.80, 0.85, 0.90, and 0.95, and hexagonal packing separations for the island blocks of 0.50, 0.75, 1.00, 1.25, and 1.50 cm, that is, 30 unique IM configurations and 840 unique beam-IM combinations. A combination was deemed acceptable if the average intensity downstream of the intensity modulator agreed within 2% of that intended and the variation in fluence was less than +/- 2%. Results For 100 cm SSD, and for 0.5 cm depth, results showed that beam energies above 13 MeV did not exhibit sufficient scatter to produce clinically acceptable fluence (intensity) distributions for all IRF values (0.70-0.95). In particular, 20 MeV fluence distributions were unacceptable for any values, and acceptable 16 MeV fluence distributions were limited to a minimum IRF of 0.85. For the 2.0 cm depth, beam energies up to and including 20 MeV had acceptable fluence distributions. For 103 cm SSD and for 0.5 cm and 2.0 cm depths, results showed that all beam energies (7-20 MeV) had clinically acceptable fluence distributions for all IRF values (0.70-0.95). In general, the more clinically likely 103 cm SSD had acceptable fluence distributions with larger separations (r), which allow larger block diameters. Conclusion The geometric operating range of island block separations and IRF values (block diameters) producing clinically appropriate IM electron beams has been determined.
引用
收藏
页码:131 / 145
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Initial experience with intensity-modulated conformal radiation therapy for treatment of the head and neck region
    Verellen, D
    Linthout, N
    VandenBerge, D
    Bel, A
    Storme, G
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1997, 39 (01): : 99 - 114
  • [22] Dosimetric Comparison of Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy, Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy and Hybrid Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy/Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Techniques for Right Breast Cancer
    Liu, Yi-Chi
    Chang, Hung-Ming
    Lin, Hsin-Hon
    Lu, Chia-Chun
    Lai, Lu-Han
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2020, 9 (12) : 1 - 14
  • [23] Cardiac Exposure in the Dynamic Conformal Arc Therapy, Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy and Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy of Lung Cancer
    Ming, Xin
    Feng, Yuanming
    Liu, Huan
    Zhang, Ying
    Zhou, Li
    Deng, Jun
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (12):
  • [24] Cardiac Toxicity in Dynamic Conformal Arc Therapy, Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy and Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy of Lung Cancers
    Ming, X.
    Feng, Y.
    Zhang, Y.
    Zhou, L.
    Deng, J.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (06) : 236 - +
  • [25] First evaluation of Bolus-Electron-Conformal-Therapy and intensity modulation for FLASH radiotherapy
    Konradsson, E.
    Szecsenyi, R. Ericsson
    Adrian, G.
    Coskun, M.
    Borresen, B.
    Arendt, M.
    Erhart, K.
    Petersson, K.
    Ceberg, C.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2023, 182 : S753 - S754
  • [26] Optimization and clinical use of multisegment intensity-modulated radiation therapy for high-dose conformal therapy
    Fraass, BA
    Kessler, ML
    McShan, DL
    Marsh, LH
    Watson, BA
    Dusseau, WJ
    Eisbruch, A
    Sandler, HM
    Lichter, AS
    SEMINARS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 1999, 9 (01) : 60 - +
  • [27] Comparisons of 3-Dimensional Conformal and Intensity-Modulated Neutron Therapy for Head and Neck Cancers
    Viscariello, Natalie
    Greer, Matthew D.
    Parvathaneni, Upendra
    Liao, Jay J.
    Laramore, George E.
    Stewart, Robert D.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PARTICLE THERAPY, 2021, 8 (02) : 51 - 61
  • [28] Conformal Radiotherapy with Sequential Boost Versus Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy with a Simultaneously Integrated Boost
    Komisopoulos, G.
    Tolia, M.
    Siountas, A.
    Stathakis, S.
    Papanikolaou, N.
    Mavroidis, P.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 48 (06)
  • [29] DISEASE CONTROL AFTER REDUCED VOLUME CONFORMAL AND INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIATION THERAPY FOR CHILDHOOD CRANIOPHARYNGIOMA
    Merchant, Thomas
    Kun, Larry
    Hua, Chia-ho
    Wu, Shengjie
    Xiong, Xiaoping
    Sanford, Robert
    Boop, Frederick
    PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER, 2010, 55 (05) : 792 - 792
  • [30] A Dosimetric Comparison of Three-Dimension Conformal and Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy in Esophageal Cancer
    Gallardo, N.
    Maneru, F.
    Fuentemilla, N.
    Olasolo, J.
    Gracia, M.
    Pellejero, S.
    Bragado, L.
    Lozares, S.
    Miquelez, S.
    Martin, M.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 42 (06) : 3336 - 3336