Monte Carlo Methods for the Neutron Transport Equation

被引:1
|
作者
Cox, Alexander M. G. [1 ]
Harris, Simon C. [2 ]
Kyprianou, Andreas E. [1 ]
Wang, Minmin [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bath, Dept Math Sci, Bath BA2 7AY, England
[2] Univ Auckland, Dept Stat, Auckland 1142, New Zealand
[3] Univ Sussex, Sch Math & Phys Sci, Brighton BN1 9RH, England
来源
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
neutron transport equation; principal eigenvalue; semigroup theory; Perron-Frobenius decomposi-tion; Monte Carlo simulation; complexity; Doob h-transform; twisted Monte Carlo; STOCHASTIC-APPROXIMATION; SPACES;
D O I
10.1137/21M1390578
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
This paper continues our treatment of the neutron transport equation (NTE), building on the work in [A. M. G. Cox et al., J. Stat. Phys., 176 (2019), pp. 425-455; E. Horton, A. E. Kyprianou, and D. Villemonais, Ann Appl. Probab., 30 (2020), pp. 2573-2612; and S. C. Harris, E. Horton, and A. E. Kyprianou, Ann. Appl. Probab., 30 (2020), pp. 2815-2845], which describes the density (equivalently, flux) of neutrons through inhomogeneous fissile media. Our aim is to analyze existing and novel Monte Carlo (MC) algorithms, aimed at simulating the lead eigenvalue associated with the underlying model. This quantity is of principal importance in the nuclear regulatory industry, for which the NTE must be solved on complicated inhomogeneous domains corresponding to nuclear reactor cores, irradiative hospital equipment, food irradiation equipment, and so on. We include a complexity analysis of such MC algorithms, noting that no such undertaking has previously appeared in the literature. The new MC algorithms offer a variety of advantages and disadvantages of accuracy versus cost, as well as the possibility of more convenient computational parallelization.
引用
收藏
页码:775 / 825
页数:51
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Study on domain decomposition method for Monte Carlo simulation of neutron transport
    Liang, Jin-Gang, 1600, Atomic Energy Press (48):
  • [42] DEVELOPMENT OF A SPATIAL DOMAIN DECOMPOSITION SCHEME FOR MONTE CARLO NEUTRON TRANSPORT
    Garcia, Manuel
    Ferraro, Diego
    Sanchez-Espinoza, Victor Hugo
    Mercatali, Luigi
    Leppanen, Jaakko
    Valtavirta, Ville
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 26TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NUCLEAR ENGINEERING, 2018, VOL 3, 2018,
  • [43] Accelerating Monte Carlo Simulation of Neutron Transport on the Intel MIC architecture
    Cui, Xiantao
    Liu, Jie
    Chi, Lihua
    Wang, Qinglin
    2015 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION SCIENCE AND CONTROL ENGINEERING ICISCE 2015, 2015, : 598 - 602
  • [44] IMPORTANCE ESTIMATION IN MONTE-CARLO MODELING OF NEUTRON AND PHOTON TRANSPORT
    MICKAEL, MW
    NUCLEAR GEOPHYSICS, 1992, 6 (03): : 341 - 350
  • [45] TRIPOLI-3: A neutron/photon Monte Carlo transport code
    Nimal, JC
    Vergnaud, T
    ADVANCED MONTE CARLO FOR RADIATION PHYSICS, PARTICLE TRANSPORT SIMULATION AND APPLICATIONS, 2001, : 651 - 656
  • [46] CAD-Based Monte Carlo Neutron Transport Analysis for KSTAR
    Seo, Geon Ho
    Choi, Sung Hoon
    Shim, Hyung Jin
    ICRS-13 & RPSD-2016, 13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RADIATION SHIELDING & 19TH TOPICAL MEETING OF THE RADIATION PROTECTION AND SHIELDING DIVISION OF THE AMERICAN NUCLEAR SOCIETY - 2016, 2017, 153
  • [47] MCNP - A GENERAL MONTE-CARLO CODE FOR NEUTRON AND PHOTON TRANSPORT
    FORSTER, RA
    GODFREY, TNK
    LECTURE NOTES IN PHYSICS, 1985, 240 : 33 - 55
  • [48] Monte-Carlo Neutrino Transport in Neutron Star Merger Simulations
    Foucart, Francois
    Duez, Matthew D.
    Hebert, Francois
    Kidder, Lawrence E.
    Pfeiffer, Harald P.
    Scheel, Mark A.
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS, 2020, 902 (01)
  • [49] A non-parametric bootstrap method for Monte Carlo neutron transport
    Skretteberg, Martin
    Cosgrove, Paul
    Kowalski, Mikolaj
    ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2025, 213
  • [50] GPU accelerated Monte Carlo simulation of deep penetration neutron transport
    Yang, Bo
    Lu, Kai
    Liu, Jie
    Wang, Xiaoping
    Gong, Chunye
    2012 2ND IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PARALLEL, DISTRIBUTED AND GRID COMPUTING (PDGC), 2012, : 899 - 904