Performance evaluation of piezoelectric and differential pressure sensor for vortex flowmeters

被引:33
|
作者
Venugopal, A. [1 ]
Agrawal, Amit [1 ]
Prabhu, S. V. [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol, Dept Mech Engn, Bombay 400076, Maharashtra, India
关键词
Differential pressure sensor; Piezoelectric sensor; Bluff body; Strouhal number; STROUHAL NUMBER; BLUFF-BODIES; SHEDDER; PROBE;
D O I
10.1016/j.measurement.2013.12.018
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Piezoelectric and transient differential pressure sensors are two among the most widely employed sensors for vortex flowmeter application. The present study evaluates the performance of these two techniques under fully developed and disturbed flow conditions. Firstly, the location of the transient differential pressure sensor is optimized to obtain high amplitude signals and good linearity in Strouhal number. Empirical mode decomposition method in combination with autocorrelation decay is successfully employed at high Reynolds numbers to identify the vortex shedding frequency in presence of hydrodynamic noise. The performance of the differential pressure sensor deteriorates significantly under disturbed flow conditions at low Reynolds number due to the presence of low frequency components. This deterioration in the signal quality limits the lower operating range of the flowmeter with differential pressure sensor. The output signals of the piezoelectric sensor and differential pressure sensor under no flow condition are compared to obtain the background noise due to piping vibrations and electrical interferences. These results will help a designer to suggest robust signal processing algorithms for vortex frequency detection. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:10 / 18
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] PIEZOELECTRIC BLOOD PRESSURE SENSOR FOR IMPLANTABLE DEVICES
    Katey, Bright
    Voiculescu, Ioana
    Li, Fang
    Untaroiu, Alexandrina
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF ASME 2023 INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL ENGINEERING CONGRESS AND EXPOSITION, IMECE2023, VOL 12, 2023,
  • [42] Investigation of a pulsed waveguide piezoelectric pressure sensor
    A. L. Surkaev
    V. G. Kul’kov
    [J]. Acoustical Physics, 2006, 52 : 218 - 221
  • [43] MEMS piezoelectric pressure sensor - modelling and simulation
    Kutis, Vladimir
    Dzuba, Jaroslav
    Paulech, Juraj
    Murin, Justin
    Lalinsky, Tibor
    [J]. MODELLING OF MECHANICAL AND MECHATRONICS SYSTEMS, 2012, 48 : 338 - 345
  • [44] Improving the Measurement Accuracy of a Piezoelectric Pressure Sensor
    Ovechkina, Elena
    Dianov, Sergey
    Glushkova, Victoria
    [J]. 2019 URAL SYMPOSIUM ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, RADIOELECTRONICS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (USBEREIT), 2019, : 455 - 457
  • [45] A Thin-Film Piezoelectric Pressure Sensor
    A. A. Kazaryan
    [J]. Measurement Techniques, 2002, 45 : 515 - 518
  • [46] Investigation of a pulsed waveguide piezoelectric pressure sensor
    Surkaev, AL
    Kul'kov, VG
    [J]. ACOUSTICAL PHYSICS, 2006, 52 (02) : 218 - 221
  • [47] A thin-film piezoelectric pressure sensor
    Kazaryan, AA
    [J]. MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES, 2002, 45 (05) : 515 - 518
  • [48] BROAD-BAND PIEZOELECTRIC PRESSURE SENSOR
    GODONYUK, VA
    ZHURAVLEV, BV
    SHEDKO, IP
    [J]. INSTRUMENTS AND EXPERIMENTAL TECHNIQUES, 1984, 27 (05) : 1281 - 1284
  • [49] Performance evaluation of eight electromagnetic flowmeters with fine sand slurries
    Heywood, NI
    Mehta, KB
    [J]. SLURRY HANDLING AND PIPELINE TRANSPORT - HYDROTRANSPORT 14, 1999, (36): : 413 - 431
  • [50] Measurement Performance Evaluation of Tactile Pressure Sensor with Different Particle Sizes and Sensor Curvatures
    Liu, KaiYuan
    Xu, ChengShun
    Zhang, Xiaoling
    [J]. GEOTECHNICAL TESTING JOURNAL, 2021, 44 (04): : 1036 - 1054