Guidance and examination by ultrasound versus landmark and radiographic method for placement of subclavian central venous catheters: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

被引:3
|
作者
Perbet, Sebastien [1 ,2 ]
Pereira, Bruno [3 ]
Grimaldi, Florian [1 ]
Duale, Christian [4 ]
Bazin, Jean-Etienne [1 ]
Constantin, Jean-Michel [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] CHU Clermont Ferrand, CHU Estaing, Intens Care Unit, Dept Anesthesiol & Crit Care Med, F-63000 Clermont Ferrand, France
[2] Univ Auvergne, D2R2, EA 7281, Fac Med, F-63001 Clermont Ferrand, France
[3] CHU Gabriel Montpied, DRCI, Biostat Unit, CHU Clermont Ferrand, F-630003 Clermont Ferrand, France
[4] CHU Clermont Ferrand, CHU Gabriel Montpied, Ctr Invest Clin, F-63003 Clermont Ferrand, France
关键词
central venous catheter; subclavian vein; ultrasound guidance; pulmonary ultrasound; cardiac ultrasound; contrast test; INTERNAL JUGULAR-VEIN; CANNULATION; SIGN; PNEUMOTHORAX;
D O I
10.1186/1745-6215-15-175
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: Central venous catheters play an important role in patient care. Real-time ultrasound- guided subclavian central venous (SCV) cannulation may reduce the incidence of complications and the time between skin penetration and the aspiration of venous blood into the syringe. Ultrasonic diagnosis of catheter misplacement and pneumothorax related to central venous catheterization is rapid and accurate. It is unclear, however, whether ultrasound real-time guidance and examination can reduce procedure times and complication rates when compared with landmark guidance and radiographic examination for SCV catheterization. Methods/Design: The Subclavian Central Venous Catheters Guidance and Examination by UltraSound (SUBGEUS) study is an investigator-initiated single center, randomized, controlled two-arm trial. Three hundred patients undergoing SCV catheter placement will be randomized to ultrasound real-time guidance and examination or landmark guidance and radiographic examination. The primary outcome is the time between the beginning of the procedure and control of the catheter. Secondary outcomes include the times required for the six components of the total procedure, the occurrence of complications (pneumothorax, hemothorax, or misplacement), failure of the technique and occurrence of central venous catheter infections. Discussion: The SUBGEUS trial is the first randomized controlled study to investigate whether ultrasound real-time guidance and examination for SCV catheter placement reduces all procedure times and the rate of complications.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Ultrasound guidance versus landmark guidance for intrathecal baclofen pump refill: A randomized pilot study
    Stone, Shane N.
    Wei, Daniel
    Reger, Christopher
    PM&R, 2023, 15 (11) : 1425 - 1430
  • [22] Evaluating the safety and efficacy of argatroban locking solution in the prevention of the dysfunction of haemodialysis central venous catheters: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Wang, Yiqin
    Liu, Chao
    Zhang, Li
    Li, Jijun
    Zhang, Lei
    Wang, Yong
    Zhu, Hanyu
    Cao, Xueying
    Wu, Di
    Wu, Jie
    Lin, Shupeng
    Feng, Zhe
    Cai, Guangyan
    Chen, Xiangmei
    Sun, Xuefeng
    ANNALS OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (02) : 2260 - 2270
  • [23] Study protocol for a multicentre, randomised, controlled trial to assess the effectiveness of antimicrobial central venous catheters versus ordinary central venous catheters at reducing catheter related infections in critically ill Chinese patients
    Wu, Minming
    Chen, Yao
    Du, Bin
    Kang, Yan
    BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (12):
  • [24] Central or Peripheral Catheters for Initial Venous Access of ICU Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Ricard, Jean-Damien
    Salomon, Laurence
    Boyer, Alexandre
    Thiery, Guillaume
    Meybeck, Agnes
    Roy, Carine
    Pasquet, Blandine
    Le Miere, Eric
    Dreyfuss, Didier
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2013, 41 (09) : 2108 - 2115
  • [25] Real-Time Ultrasound Guidance as Compared With Landmark Technique for Subclavian Central Venous Cannulation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis With Trial Sequential Analysis
    Zawadka, Mateusz
    La Via, Luigi
    Wong, Adrian
    Olusanya, Olusegun
    Muscara, Liliana
    Continella, Carlotta
    Andruszkiewicz, Pawel
    Sanfilippo, Filippo
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2023, 51 (05) : 642 - 652
  • [26] Open Versus Ultrasound Guided Tunneled Central Venous Access in children: A Randomized Controlled Study
    Soundappan, Soundappan S., V
    Lam, Lawrence
    Cass, Daniel T.
    Karpelowsky, Jonathan
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2021, 260 : 284 - 292
  • [27] The value of real-time ultrasound-guidance for definite placement of a right supraclavicular subclavian central venous catheter
    Poth, Jens M.
    Ehrentraut, Stefan F.
    Kim, Se-Chan
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR ACCESS, 2022, 23 (03): : 474 - 476
  • [28] A randomised trial of intracavitary electrocardiography versus surface landmark measurement for central venous access device placement
    Alexandrou, Evan
    Mifflin, Nicholas
    McManus, Craig
    Sou, Vanno
    Frost, Steven A.
    Sanghavi, Ritesh
    Doss, David
    Pillay, Sugendran
    Lawson, Kenny
    Aneman, Anders
    Konstantinou, Evangelos
    Rickard, Claire M.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR ACCESS, 2023, 24 (06): : 1372 - 1380
  • [29] Comparison of ultrasound guidance for axillary or subclavian vein catheterization: a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial
    B Louart
    G Buzançais
    C Roger
    L Muller
    JY Lefrant
    Intensive Care Medicine Experimental, 3 (Suppl 1)
  • [30] Ultrasound guidance versus anatomical landmark approach for femoral artery access in coronary angiography: A randomized controlled trial and a meta-analysis
    Marquis-Gravel, Guillaume
    Tremblay-Gravel, Maxime
    Levesque, Jonathan
    Genereux, Philippe
    Schampaert, Erick
    Palisaitis, Donald
    Doucet, Michel
    Charron, Thierry
    Terriault, Paul
    Tessier, Pierre
    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 31 (04) : 496 - 503