Central or Peripheral Catheters for Initial Venous Access of ICU Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:73
|
作者
Ricard, Jean-Damien [1 ,2 ]
Salomon, Laurence [3 ]
Boyer, Alexandre [4 ]
Thiery, Guillaume [5 ]
Meybeck, Agnes [1 ]
Roy, Carine [6 ,7 ]
Pasquet, Blandine [6 ,7 ]
Le Miere, Eric [1 ]
Dreyfuss, Didier [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Hop Louis Mourier, AP HP, Serv Reanimat Medicochirurg, F-92701 Colombes, France
[2] Univ Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cite, UMRS 722, F-75018 Paris, France
[3] Hop Louis Mourier, AP HP, Dept Sante Publ, F-92701 Colombes, France
[4] Hop Pellegrin Tripode, Serv Reanimat Med, Bordeaux, France
[5] Hop St Louis, AP HP, Serv Reanimat Med, Paris, France
[6] Hop Bichat Claude Bernard, AP HP, Dept Biostat, F-75877 Paris, France
[7] Hop Bichat Claude Bernard, AP HP, Rech Clin, F-75877 Paris, France
关键词
catheters; complications; nosocomial infection; quality of care; venous access; CRITICALLY-ILL PATIENTS; PREVENTION; INFECTION; COMPLICATIONS; PREVALENCE; PNEUMONIA; MEDICINE; DEVICES; RISK;
D O I
10.1097/CCM.0b013e31828a42c5
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objectives: The vast majority of ICU patients require some form of venous access. There are no evidenced-based guidelines concerning the use of either central or peripheral venous catheters, despite very different complications. It remains unknown which to insert in ICU patients. We investigated the rate of catheter-related insertion or maintenance complications in two strategies: one favoring the central venous catheters and the other peripheral venous catheters. Design: Multicenter, controlled, parallel-group, open-label randomized trial. Setting: Three French ICUs. Patients: Adult ICU patients with equal central or peripheral venous access requirement. Intervention: Patients were randomized to receive central venous catheters or peripheral venous catheters as initial venous access. Measurements and Results: The primary endpoint was the rate of major catheter-related complications within 28 days. Secondary endpoints were the rate of minor catheter-related complications and a composite score-assessing staff utilization and time spent to manage catheter insertions. Analysis was intention to treat. We randomly assigned 135 patients to receive a central venous catheter and 128 patients to receive a peripheral venous catheter. Major catheter-related complications were greater in the peripheral venous catheter than in the central venous catheter group (133 vs 87, respectively, p = 0.02) although none of those was life threatening. Minor catheter-related complications were 201 with central venous catheters and 248 with peripheral venous catheters (p = 0.06). 46% (60/128) patients were managed throughout their ICU stay with peripheral venous catheters only. There were significantly more peripheral venous catheter-related complications per patient in patients managed solely with peripheral venous catheter than in patients that received peripheral venous catheter and at least one central venous catheter: 1.92 (121/63) versus 1.13 (226/200), p < 0.005. There was no difference in central venous catheter-related complications per patient between patients initially randomized to peripheral venous catheters but subsequently crossed-over to central venous catheter and patients randomized to the central venous catheter group. Kaplan-Meier estimates of survival probability did not differ between the two groups. Conclusion: In ICU patients with equal central or peripheral venous access requirement, central venous catheters should preferably be inserted: a strategy associated with less major complications.
引用
收藏
页码:2108 / 2115
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Peripherally Inserted Central Venous Catheters to Peripheral Intravenous Catheters in Very Low Birth Weight Infants 1450
    Marianne D Janes
    Angela K Kalyn
    Janet Pinelli
    Pediatric Research, 1998, 43 (Suppl 4) : 248 - 248
  • [2] IMPROVING ACCESS AND MAINTENANCE OF CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETERS TO DECREASE CLABSI IN THE ICU
    Dodick, Todd
    Gaudet, Ross
    Landon, Emily
    O'Connor, Michael
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2015, 43 (12)
  • [3] CENTRAL OR PERIPHERAL VENOUS CATHETERS
    KATHIRITHAMBY, KS
    BRYANBROWN, CW
    SHAPIRO, B
    LUMB, PD
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1979, 7 (03) : 132 - 132
  • [4] Comparison of oligon central venous catheters with standard multilumen central venous catheters in cardiac surgery ICU patients
    I Mpisiadis
    E Douka
    I Kriaras
    D Markantonaki
    S Geroulanos
    Critical Care, 12 (Suppl 2):
  • [5] Performance comparison of peripherally inserted central venous catheters in gastrointestinal surgery: A randomized controlled trial
    Miyagaki, Hiromichi
    Nakajima, Kiyokazu
    Hara, Joji
    Yamasaki, Makoto
    Kurokawa, Yukinori
    Miyata, Hiroshi
    Takiguchi, Shuji
    Fujiwara, Yoshiyuki
    Mori, Masaki
    Doki, Yuichiro
    CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2012, 31 (01) : 48 - 52
  • [6] A prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing transparent polyurethane and hydrocolloid dressings for central venous catheters
    Nikoletti, S
    Leslie, G
    Gandossi, S
    Coombs, G
    Wilson, R
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 1999, 27 (06) : 488 - 496
  • [7] Utility of peripheral venous blood cultures in patients with central venous catheters
    Adamkiewicz, TV
    PEDIATRIC INFECTIOUS DISEASE JOURNAL, 2000, 19 (05) : 491 - 492
  • [8] A randomized trial comparing peripherally inserted central venous catheters and peripheral intravenous catheters in infants with very low birth weight
    Janes, M
    Kalyn, A
    Pinelli, J
    Paes, B
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2000, 35 (07) : 1040 - 1044
  • [9] Complications related to the use of peripheral venous catheters: a randomized clinical trial
    Reichembach Danski, Mitzy Tannia
    Johann, Derdried Athanasio
    Vayego, Stela Adami
    Lemes de Oliveira, Gabriella Rodrigues
    Lind, Jolline
    ACTA PAULISTA DE ENFERMAGEM, 2016, 29 (01) : 84 - 92
  • [10] Temporary access and central venous catheters
    Frankel, A
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2006, 31 (04) : 417 - 422