Alterations of the bone dimension following immediate implant placement into extraction socket: systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:72
|
作者
Lee, Chun-Teh [1 ]
Chiu, Tzu-Shan [2 ]
Chuang, Sung-Kiang [3 ,4 ]
Tarnow, Dennis [2 ]
Stoupel, Janet [2 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Sch Dent Med, Dept Oral Med Infect & Immun, Div Periodontol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Columbia Univ, Coll Dent Med, Sect Oral & Diagnost Sci, Div Periodont, New York, NY 10032 USA
[3] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[4] Harvard Univ, Sch Dent Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
bone dimension; immediate implant; meta-analysis; systematic review; BEAM COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; HARD-TISSUE ALTERATIONS; ALVEOLAR RIDGE; MAXILLARY ANTERIOR; PROSPECTIVE COHORT; TOOTH EXTRACTION; CLINICAL-TRIAL; BUCCAL BONE; PRESERVATION; FLAP;
D O I
10.1111/jcpe.12276
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Aim: This systematic review was aimed at analysing bone dimensional alterations within the first year following immediate implant placement. Materials and Methods: The electronic search was conducted using MEDLINE (PubMed), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and EMBASE from January 1980 to October 2013. Quality assessment of selected articles was performed using Cochrane Collaboration's tool or Newcastle-Ottawa scale according to the design of each study. A meta-analysis was performed to estimate bone dimensional reduction. Weighted mean differences in bone dimension between baseline and follow-up measurement were calculated. Subgroup analysis and mete-regression were conducted to evaluate the effects of different variables. Results: A total of 1348 articles were identified following the search process. Six studies were included in the present review. The weighted mean buccal horizontal bone dimensional reduction (BHDr) was 1.07 mm and buccal vertical bone dimensional reduction (BVDr) was 0.78 mm. The weighted mean palatal bone dimensional reduction was 0.62 mm horizontally (PHDr) and 0.50 mm vertically (PVDr). The initial thickness of the buccal alveolar plate (TB) of the socket was the only variable significantly correlated with BHDr and BVDr in meta-regression analysis. Conclusions: The bone dimensions of immediate implant sites demonstrated approximately 0.5-1.0 mm reduction in vertical and horizontal aspects 4-12 months following surgery. The results should be interpreted with care because of the data heterogeneity. The correlation of the socket buccal wall thickness, and other variables, with dimensional changes of the bony ridge should be investigated further in controlled clinical trials.
引用
收藏
页码:914 / 926
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Soft and hard tissue changes following immediate implant placement and immediate loading in aesthetic zone-a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Gaddale, Reetika
    Chowdhary, Ramesh
    Mishra, Sunil K.
    Sagar, Kamal
    EVIDENCE-BASED DENTISTRY, 2024,
  • [22] Immediate implant placement and simultaneous bone grafting with bone cement in extraction sockets: A systematic review
    V. Chaubal, Tanay
    Yeoh, Wei Chun
    Phua, Cynthia Kai Shien
    Bapat, Ranjeet
    Pulikkotil, Shaju Jacob
    SAUDI DENTAL JOURNAL, 2024, 36 (08) : 1051 - 1057
  • [23] Effectiveness of immediate implant placement into defective sockets in the esthetic zone: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chen, Rui
    Xu, Jialin
    Wang, Shuang
    Duan, Siyi
    Wang, Zijian
    Zhang, Xiaodong
    Tang, Yulong
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2025, 133 (02): : 411 - 426
  • [24] Immediate placement, immediate loading of single implant in fresh extraction socket
    Gupta, Gaurav
    Gupta, D. K.
    Gupta, Neelja
    Gupta, Priyanka
    Rana, Kuldeep Singh
    CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL DENTISTRY, 2019, 10 (02) : 389 - 393
  • [25] Bone graft substitutes and dental implant stability in immediate implant surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Vanka, Shanthi
    Abul Kasem, Fatima
    Kailani, Tasnem
    Wali, Othman
    Vanka, Amit
    EVIDENCE-BASED DENTISTRY, 2024, : 70 - 70
  • [26] Which is the best choice after tooth extraction, immediate implant placement or delayed placement with alveolar ridge preservation? A systematic review and meta-analysis
    dos Santos Canellas, Joao Vitor
    D'Albuquerque Medeiros, Paulo Jose
    da Silva Figueredo, Carlos Marcelo
    Fischer, Ricardo Guimaraes
    Ritto, Fabio Gamboa
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2019, 47 (11) : 1793 - 1802
  • [27] Simultaneous implant placement with autogenous onlay bone grafts: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ma, Guoqiang
    Wu, Chaoan
    Shao, Miaoting
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2021, 7 (01)
  • [28] Simultaneous implant placement with autogenous onlay bone grafts: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Guoqiang Ma
    Chaoan Wu
    Miaoting Shao
    International Journal of Implant Dentistry, 7
  • [29] Efficacy of lateral bone augmentation prior to implant placement: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Naenni, Nadja
    Lim, Hyun-Chang
    Papageorgiou, Spyridon N.
    Hammerle, Christoph H. F.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2019, 46 : 287 - 306
  • [30] Failure Rate, Marginal Bone Loss, and Pink Esthetic with Socket-Shield Technique for Immediate Dental Implant Placement in the Esthetic Zone. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Velasco Bohorquez, Pilar
    Rucco, Roberta
    Zubizarreta-Macho, Alvaro
    Montiel-Company, Jose Maria
    de la Vega Buro, Susana
    Madrono, Esther Caceres
    Marin, Lara San Hipolito
    Hernandez Montero, Sofia
    BIOLOGY-BASEL, 2021, 10 (06):