Simultaneous implant placement with autogenous onlay bone grafts: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:16
|
作者
Ma, Guoqiang [1 ]
Wu, Chaoan [2 ]
Shao, Miaoting [1 ]
机构
[1] Jinhua Stomatol Hosp, Dept Oral Implantol, 277 Silian Rd, Jinhua 321000, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Yingtan Shangpin Dent Clin, Dept Stomatol, Yingtan 335000, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
关键词
Block grafts; Iliac graft; Survival; Immediate placement; Ridge augmentation; ALVEOLAR RIDGE AUGMENTATION; ENDOSTEAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; REGENERATED AREAS; FOLLOW-UP; IMMEDIATE;
D O I
10.1186/s40729-021-00311-4
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Several authors have suggested that implants can be placed simultaneously with onlay bone grafts without affecting outcomes. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to answer the following clinical questions: (1) What are the outcomes of implants placed simultaneously with autogenous onlay bone grafts? And (2) is there a difference in outcomes between simultaneous vs delayed placement of implants with autogenous onlay bone grafts? Databases of PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar were searched up to 15 November 2020. Data on implant survival was extracted from all the included studies (single arm and comparative) to calculate point estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and pooled using the DerSimonian-Laird meta-analysis model. We also compared implant survival rates between the simultaneous and delayed placement of implants with data from comparative studies. Nineteen studies were included. Five of them compared simultaneous and delayed placement of implants. Dividing the studies based on follow-up duration, the pooled survival of implant placed simultaneously with onlay grafts after <2.5 years of follow-up was 93.1% (95% CI 82.6 to 97.4%) and after 2.5-5 years was 86% (95% CI 78.6 to 91.1%). Implant survival was found to be 85.8% (95% CI 79.6 to 90.3%) with iliac crest grafts and 95.7% (95% CI 83.9 to 93.0%) with intra-oral grafts. Our results indicated no statistically significant difference in implant survival between simultaneous and delayed placement (OR 0.43, 95% 0.07, 2.49, I-2=59.04%). Data on implant success and bone loss were limited. Data indicates that implants placed simultaneously with autogenous onlay grafts have a survival rate of 93.1% and 86% after a follow-up of <2.5 years and 2.5-5years respectively. A limited number of studies indicate no significant difference in implant survival between the simultaneous and delayed placement of implants with onlay bone grafts. There is a need for randomized controlled trials comparing simultaneous and delayed implant placement to provide robust evidence.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Simultaneous implant placement with autogenous onlay bone grafts: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Guoqiang Ma
    Chaoan Wu
    Miaoting Shao
    International Journal of Implant Dentistry, 7
  • [2] Regenerating Alveolar Bone for Implant Placement: The Efficacy of Autogenous Mineralized Dentin Matrix-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Menem, Madalena
    Santos, Alexandre
    Mascarenhas, Paulo
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2024, 14 (21):
  • [3] Efficacy of the autogenous dentin graft for implant placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Mahardawi, B.
    Jiaranuchart, S.
    Tompkins, K. A.
    Pimkhaokham, A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2023, 52 (05) : 604 - 612
  • [4] Efficacy of lateral bone augmentation prior to implant placement: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Naenni, Nadja
    Lim, Hyun-Chang
    Papageorgiou, Spyridon N.
    Hammerle, Christoph H. F.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2019, 46 : 287 - 306
  • [5] Horizontal Alveolar Ridge Augmentation with Xenogenic Block Grafts Compared with Autogenous Bone Block Grafts for Implant-retained Rehabilitation: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Christensen, Jeppe Gronemann
    Gronlund, Gustav Pors
    Georgi, Signe Risom
    Jensen, Thomas Starch-
    Bruun, Niels Henrik
    Jensen, Simon Storgard
    JOMR-JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL RESEARCH, 2023, 14 (02):
  • [6] Bioactive treatments in bone grafts for implant-based rehabilitation: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    de Oliveira da Rosa, Wellington Luiz
    da Silva, Tiago Machado
    da Silva, Adriana Fernandes
    Piva, Evandro
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2018, 20 (02) : 251 - 260
  • [7] Bone envelope for implant placement after alveolar ridge preservation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kai R. Fischer
    Alex Solderer
    Kristina Arlt
    Christian Heumann
    Chun Ching Liu
    Patrick R. Schmidlin
    International Journal of Implant Dentistry, 8
  • [8] Bone envelope for implant placement after alveolar ridge preservation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Fischer, Kai R.
    Solderer, Alex
    Arlt, Kristina
    Heumann, Christian
    Liu, Chun Ching
    Schmidlin, Patrick R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2022, 8 (01)
  • [9] Immediate implant placement in compromised sockets: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Amid, Reza
    Kadkhodazadeh, Mahdi
    Moscowchi, Anahita
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2023, 130 (03): : 307 - 317
  • [10] Autogenous grafts for reconstruction arthroplasty in temporomandibular joint ankylosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mittal, Neeti
    Goyal, Manoj
    Sardana, Divesh
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2022, 60 (09): : 1151 - 1158