Simultaneous implant placement with autogenous onlay bone grafts: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:16
|
作者
Ma, Guoqiang [1 ]
Wu, Chaoan [2 ]
Shao, Miaoting [1 ]
机构
[1] Jinhua Stomatol Hosp, Dept Oral Implantol, 277 Silian Rd, Jinhua 321000, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Yingtan Shangpin Dent Clin, Dept Stomatol, Yingtan 335000, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
关键词
Block grafts; Iliac graft; Survival; Immediate placement; Ridge augmentation; ALVEOLAR RIDGE AUGMENTATION; ENDOSTEAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; REGENERATED AREAS; FOLLOW-UP; IMMEDIATE;
D O I
10.1186/s40729-021-00311-4
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Several authors have suggested that implants can be placed simultaneously with onlay bone grafts without affecting outcomes. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to answer the following clinical questions: (1) What are the outcomes of implants placed simultaneously with autogenous onlay bone grafts? And (2) is there a difference in outcomes between simultaneous vs delayed placement of implants with autogenous onlay bone grafts? Databases of PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar were searched up to 15 November 2020. Data on implant survival was extracted from all the included studies (single arm and comparative) to calculate point estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and pooled using the DerSimonian-Laird meta-analysis model. We also compared implant survival rates between the simultaneous and delayed placement of implants with data from comparative studies. Nineteen studies were included. Five of them compared simultaneous and delayed placement of implants. Dividing the studies based on follow-up duration, the pooled survival of implant placed simultaneously with onlay grafts after <2.5 years of follow-up was 93.1% (95% CI 82.6 to 97.4%) and after 2.5-5 years was 86% (95% CI 78.6 to 91.1%). Implant survival was found to be 85.8% (95% CI 79.6 to 90.3%) with iliac crest grafts and 95.7% (95% CI 83.9 to 93.0%) with intra-oral grafts. Our results indicated no statistically significant difference in implant survival between simultaneous and delayed placement (OR 0.43, 95% 0.07, 2.49, I-2=59.04%). Data on implant success and bone loss were limited. Data indicates that implants placed simultaneously with autogenous onlay grafts have a survival rate of 93.1% and 86% after a follow-up of <2.5 years and 2.5-5years respectively. A limited number of studies indicate no significant difference in implant survival between the simultaneous and delayed placement of implants with onlay bone grafts. There is a need for randomized controlled trials comparing simultaneous and delayed implant placement to provide robust evidence.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The effectiveness of immediate implant placement for single tooth replacement compared to delayed implant placement: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Cosyn, Jan
    De Lat, Liesa
    Seyssens, Lorenz
    Doornewaard, Ron
    Deschepper, Ellen
    Vervaeke, Stijn
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2019, 46 : 224 - 241
  • [32] Immediate implant placement with or without connective tissue graft: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Seyssens, Lorenz
    De Lat, Liesa
    Cosyn, Jan
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2021, 48 (02) : 284 - 301
  • [33] Accuracy assessment of dynamic computer–aided implant placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Adrià Jorba-García
    Albert González-Barnadas
    Octavi Camps-Font
    Rui Figueiredo
    Eduard Valmaseda-Castellón
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 2021, 25 : 2479 - 2494
  • [34] Dental Implant Survival in Vascularized Bone Flaps: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Panchal, Hina
    Shamsunder, Meghana G.
    Petrovic, Ivana
    Rosen, Evan B.
    Allen, Robert J., Jr.
    Hernandez, Marisol
    Ganly, Ian
    Boyle, Jay O.
    Matros, Evan
    Nelson, Jonas A.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2020, 146 (03) : 637 - 648
  • [35] Bone Quality and Quantity and Dental Implant Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Chrcanovic, Bruno Ramos
    Albrektsson, Tomas
    Wennerberg, Ann
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS, 2017, 30 (03) : 219 - 237
  • [36] Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a New Active Transcutaneous Bone Conduction Implant
    Key, Seraphina
    Mohamed, Nusrat
    Da Cruz, Melville
    Kong, Kelvin
    Hasan, Zubair
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2024, 134 (04): : 1531 - 1539
  • [37] Implant insertion torque and marginal bone loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Roca-Millan, Elisabet
    Gonzalez-Navarro, Beatriz
    Dominguez-Minger, Judith
    Mari-Roig, Antonio
    Jane-Salas, Enric
    Lopez-Lopez, Jose
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2020, 13 (04) : 345 - 353
  • [38] Minimal invasiveness in lateral bone augmentation with simultaneous implant placement: A systematic review
    Severi, Mattia
    Trombelli, Leonardo
    Heitz-Mayfield, Lisa
    Farina, Roberto
    Simonelli, Anna
    PERIODONTOLOGY 2000, 2023, 91 (01) : 113 - 125
  • [40] Clinical outcomes of sinus floor augmentation for implant placement using autogenous bone or bone substitutes: a systematic review
    Nkenke, Emeka
    Stelzle, Florian
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2009, 20 : 124 - 133