Simultaneous implant placement with autogenous onlay bone grafts: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:16
|
作者
Ma, Guoqiang [1 ]
Wu, Chaoan [2 ]
Shao, Miaoting [1 ]
机构
[1] Jinhua Stomatol Hosp, Dept Oral Implantol, 277 Silian Rd, Jinhua 321000, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Yingtan Shangpin Dent Clin, Dept Stomatol, Yingtan 335000, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
关键词
Block grafts; Iliac graft; Survival; Immediate placement; Ridge augmentation; ALVEOLAR RIDGE AUGMENTATION; ENDOSTEAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; REGENERATED AREAS; FOLLOW-UP; IMMEDIATE;
D O I
10.1186/s40729-021-00311-4
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Several authors have suggested that implants can be placed simultaneously with onlay bone grafts without affecting outcomes. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to answer the following clinical questions: (1) What are the outcomes of implants placed simultaneously with autogenous onlay bone grafts? And (2) is there a difference in outcomes between simultaneous vs delayed placement of implants with autogenous onlay bone grafts? Databases of PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar were searched up to 15 November 2020. Data on implant survival was extracted from all the included studies (single arm and comparative) to calculate point estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and pooled using the DerSimonian-Laird meta-analysis model. We also compared implant survival rates between the simultaneous and delayed placement of implants with data from comparative studies. Nineteen studies were included. Five of them compared simultaneous and delayed placement of implants. Dividing the studies based on follow-up duration, the pooled survival of implant placed simultaneously with onlay grafts after <2.5 years of follow-up was 93.1% (95% CI 82.6 to 97.4%) and after 2.5-5 years was 86% (95% CI 78.6 to 91.1%). Implant survival was found to be 85.8% (95% CI 79.6 to 90.3%) with iliac crest grafts and 95.7% (95% CI 83.9 to 93.0%) with intra-oral grafts. Our results indicated no statistically significant difference in implant survival between simultaneous and delayed placement (OR 0.43, 95% 0.07, 2.49, I-2=59.04%). Data on implant success and bone loss were limited. Data indicates that implants placed simultaneously with autogenous onlay grafts have a survival rate of 93.1% and 86% after a follow-up of <2.5 years and 2.5-5years respectively. A limited number of studies indicate no significant difference in implant survival between the simultaneous and delayed placement of implants with onlay bone grafts. There is a need for randomized controlled trials comparing simultaneous and delayed implant placement to provide robust evidence.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The socket shield technique for immediate implant placement: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Atieh, Momen A.
    Shah, Maanas
    Abdulkareem, Mohammed
    AlQahtani, Haif A.
    Alsabeeha, Nabeel H. M.
    JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC AND RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2021, 33 (08) : 1186 - 1200
  • [22] Autogenous bone ring for vertical bone augmentation procedure with simultaneous implant placement: A systematic review of histologic and histomorphometric outcomes in animal studies
    Gaikwad, Amit M.
    Joshi, Amruta A.
    Padhye, Ashvini M.
    Nadgere, Jyoti B.
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2021, 126 (05): : 626 - 635
  • [23] Effect of Submerged vs Nonsubmerged Implant Placement Protocols on Implant Failure and Marginal Bone Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Ali, Ramy Moustafa Moustafa
    Alqutaibi, Ahmed Yaseen
    Gomaa, Amr Salah El-din
    Abdallah, Mohamed Farouk
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS, 2018, 31 (01) : 15 - 22
  • [24] Immediate implant placement in molar extraction sockets: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ragucci, Gian Maria
    Elnayef, Basel
    Criado-Camara, Elena
    Suarez-Lopez Del Amo, Fernando
    Hernandez-Alfaro, Federico
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2020, 6 (01)
  • [25] Immediate implant placement with or without socket grafting: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Seyssens, Lorenz
    Eeckhout, Celien
    Cosyn, Jan
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2022, 24 (03) : 339 - 351
  • [26] Augmentation procedures using bone substitute materials or autogenous bone - a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Al-Nawas, Bilal
    Schiegnitz, Elk
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2014, 7 : S219 - S234
  • [27] Efficacy of bone-substitute materials use in immediate dental implant placement: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zaki, John
    Yusuf, Nermin
    El-Khadem, Ahmed
    Scholten, Rob J. P. M.
    Jenniskens, Kevin
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2021, 23 (04) : 506 - 519
  • [28] Comparative evaluation of crestal bone level by flapless and flap techniques for implant placement: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lahoti, Krishankumar
    Dandekar, Sayali
    Gade, Jaykumar
    Agrawal, Megha
    JOURNAL OF INDIAN PROSTHODONTIC SOCIETY, 2021, 21 (04): : 328 - 338
  • [29] The Use of Tissue Grafts Associated with Immediate Implant Placement to Achieve Better Peri-Implant Stability and Efficacy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Rondone, Enrico Maria
    Leitao-Almeida, Bruno
    Pereira, Miguel Silva
    Fernandes, Gustavo Vicentis Oliveira
    Borges, Tiago
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (03)
  • [30] Outcome of early dental implant placement versus other dental implant placement protocols: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Bassir, Seyed Hossein
    El Kholy, Karim
    Chen, Chia-Yu
    Lee, Kyu Ha
    Intini, Giuseppe
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2019, 90 (05) : 493 - 506