Short-term mechanical circulatory support with the Impella 5.0 device for cardiogenic shock at La Pitie-Salpetriere

被引:37
|
作者
Mastroianni, Ciro [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Bouabdallaoui, Nadia [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Leprince, Pascal [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lebreton, Guillaume [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Paris 06, Dept Thorac & Cardiovasc Surg, F-75252 Paris 05, France
[2] La Pitie Salpetriere Hosp, AP HP, Paris, France
[3] La Pitie Salpetriere Hosp, Dept Thorac & Cardiovasc Surg, 47-83 Blvd Hop, Paris, France
关键词
Cardiogenic shock; Impella LP 5.0; right axillary artery insertion; device related complications; VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICE; AXILLARY ARTERY; HEART-FAILURE;
D O I
10.1177/2048872616633877
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Cardiogenic shock carries a high mortality rate despite aggressive medical treatment. The Impella (R) Recover (R) LP 5.0 Support System is a microaxial minimally invasive ventricular assist device designed for short-term mechanical circulatory support in low cardiac output states. The aim of this study is to assess the safety of the Impella 5.0 device, using the right axillary artery approach, in cardiogenic shock managed at La Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital. Methods: Since December 2010 and during a period of 14 months, 14 highly selected patients underwent surgical implantation of an Impella 5.0 device for cardiogenic shock. Demographics, preoperative and postoperative data were retrospectively collected from La Pitie-Salpetriere computerized medical charts. Responders to Impella support were defined as patients with rapid improvement in haemodynamic condition and biological profile. Patients who had no signs of cardiac recovery after two weeks of mechanical support were considered for heart transplantation or long-term left ventricular assist device implantation. Results: Patients were predominantly male (78.5%) with a mean age of 6415. Short-term circulatory support was indicated for cardiogenic shock in the setting of acute coronary syndromes (n=7; 50%), postcardiotomy cardiac dysfunctions (n=6; 43%) and anthracycline-induced dilated cardiomyopathy (n=1; 7%). After a mean support time of 8.5 days, six patients (42.8%) were successfully weaned and four (28.5%) were switched to a long-term left ventricular assist device. No major bleeding, arm ischaemia, ventricular arrhythmia or severe haemolysis was noted. We report two cases (14%) of pump thrombosis, four cases of device displacement with the need of pump repositioning and one case (7%) of infection at the insertion site. Thirty-day mortality was 35.7%. Long-term overall mortality rate at six months, one year and two years was 42.8, 42.8 and 42.8%, respectively. Conclusions: The Impella 5.0 device surgically inserted through the axillary artery is a valuable minimally invasive short-term circulatory support in cardiogenic shock of various aetiologies.
引用
收藏
页码:87 / 92
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Single Center Experience in the Management of Cardiogenic Shock Using Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices - Impella CP, Impella 5.0, IABP, and ECMO
    Goulet, C.
    Joyce, D.
    Mohammed, A.
    Joyce, L.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2019, 38 (04): : S437 - S437
  • [32] INPATIENT OUTCOMES OF PATIENTS WITH CARDIOGENIC SHOCK UTILIZING SHORT-TERM MECHANICAL CIRCULATORY SUPPORT: A NATIONWIDE ANALYSIS
    Thakkar, Aditya
    Gupta, Soumya
    Paladugula, Abhijith
    Shastri, Dipsa D.
    Vatsavayi, Priyanka
    Vedantam, Venkata
    CHEST, 2024, 166 (04) : 767A - 767A
  • [33] Management of spontaneous coronary artery dissection complicated by cardiogenic shock using mechanical circulatory support with the Impella device
    Sharma, Shilpa
    Polak, Samantha
    George, Zachary
    LeDoux, John
    Sohn, Richard
    Stys, Adam
    Jeon, Cathy
    Ghazzawi, Yousef
    Wood, Malissa
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2021, 97 (01) : 74 - 77
  • [34] Long-term Outcome of Patients Bridged to Recovery After Short-term Mechanical Circulatory Support for Cardiogenic Shock
    Cheng, Y.
    Garan, A. R.
    Takayama, H.
    Ando, M.
    Han, J.
    Kurlansky, P. A.
    Yuzefpolskaya, M.
    Colombo, P. C.
    Naka, Y.
    Takeda, K.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2018, 37 (04): : S28 - S29
  • [35] Mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock: it is not just a matter of device
    Pappalardo, Federico
    Montisci, Andrea
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2023, 24 (04) : 230 - 231
  • [36] Predictors of 30-day Survival in Cardiogenic Shock Patients on Impella 5.0 and 5.5 Circulatory Support
    Nersesian, G.
    Spillmann, F.
    Gromann, T.
    Tschoepe, C.
    Mueller, M.
    Mulzer, J.
    Schoenrath, F.
    Starck, C.
    Falk, V.
    Potapov, E.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2020, 39 (04): : S426 - S426
  • [37] Short-term mechanical support and pharmacotherapy, a new strategy in cardiogenic shock?
    C. C. S. Tseng
    S. A. J. Chamuleau
    N. De Jonge
    F. Z. Ramjankhan
    Netherlands Heart Journal, 2014, 22 : 174 - 175
  • [38] Short-term mechanical support and pharmacotherapy, a new strategy in cardiogenic shock?
    Tseng, C. C. S.
    Chamuleau, S. A. J.
    De Jonge, N.
    Ramjankhan, F. Z.
    NETHERLANDS HEART JOURNAL, 2014, 22 (04) : 174 - 175
  • [39] Short-term mechanical circulatory support
    Donate Bertolin, Lucia
    Torregrosa Puerta, Salvador
    Montero Argudo, Jose Anastasio
    CIRUGIA CARDIOVASCULAR, 2016, 23 : 26 - 40
  • [40] Hospital Variation in the Utilization of Short-Term Nondurable Mechanical Circulatory Support in Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
    Strom, Jordan B.
    Zhao, Yuansong
    Shen, Changyu
    Chung, Mabel
    Pinto, Duane S.
    Popma, Jeffrey J.
    Cohen, David J.
    Yeh, Robert W.
    CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2019, 12 (01)