Short-term mechanical circulatory support with the Impella 5.0 device for cardiogenic shock at La Pitie-Salpetriere

被引:37
|
作者
Mastroianni, Ciro [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Bouabdallaoui, Nadia [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Leprince, Pascal [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lebreton, Guillaume [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Paris 06, Dept Thorac & Cardiovasc Surg, F-75252 Paris 05, France
[2] La Pitie Salpetriere Hosp, AP HP, Paris, France
[3] La Pitie Salpetriere Hosp, Dept Thorac & Cardiovasc Surg, 47-83 Blvd Hop, Paris, France
关键词
Cardiogenic shock; Impella LP 5.0; right axillary artery insertion; device related complications; VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICE; AXILLARY ARTERY; HEART-FAILURE;
D O I
10.1177/2048872616633877
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Cardiogenic shock carries a high mortality rate despite aggressive medical treatment. The Impella (R) Recover (R) LP 5.0 Support System is a microaxial minimally invasive ventricular assist device designed for short-term mechanical circulatory support in low cardiac output states. The aim of this study is to assess the safety of the Impella 5.0 device, using the right axillary artery approach, in cardiogenic shock managed at La Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital. Methods: Since December 2010 and during a period of 14 months, 14 highly selected patients underwent surgical implantation of an Impella 5.0 device for cardiogenic shock. Demographics, preoperative and postoperative data were retrospectively collected from La Pitie-Salpetriere computerized medical charts. Responders to Impella support were defined as patients with rapid improvement in haemodynamic condition and biological profile. Patients who had no signs of cardiac recovery after two weeks of mechanical support were considered for heart transplantation or long-term left ventricular assist device implantation. Results: Patients were predominantly male (78.5%) with a mean age of 6415. Short-term circulatory support was indicated for cardiogenic shock in the setting of acute coronary syndromes (n=7; 50%), postcardiotomy cardiac dysfunctions (n=6; 43%) and anthracycline-induced dilated cardiomyopathy (n=1; 7%). After a mean support time of 8.5 days, six patients (42.8%) were successfully weaned and four (28.5%) were switched to a long-term left ventricular assist device. No major bleeding, arm ischaemia, ventricular arrhythmia or severe haemolysis was noted. We report two cases (14%) of pump thrombosis, four cases of device displacement with the need of pump repositioning and one case (7%) of infection at the insertion site. Thirty-day mortality was 35.7%. Long-term overall mortality rate at six months, one year and two years was 42.8, 42.8 and 42.8%, respectively. Conclusions: The Impella 5.0 device surgically inserted through the axillary artery is a valuable minimally invasive short-term circulatory support in cardiogenic shock of various aetiologies.
引用
收藏
页码:87 / 92
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Short-Term Circulatory and Right Ventricle Support in Cardiogenic Shock Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation, Tandem Heart, CentriMag, and Impella
    Sultan, Ibrahim
    Kilic, Arman
    Kilic, Ahmet
    HEART FAILURE CLINICS, 2018, 14 (04) : 579 - +
  • [22] Shock Team Approach in Refractory Cardiogenic Shock Requiring Short-Term Mechanical Circulatory Support A Proof of Concept
    Taleb, Iosif
    Koliopoulou, Antigone G.
    Tandar, Anwar
    McKellar, Stephen H.
    Tonna, Joseph E.
    Nativi-Nicolau, Jose
    Alvarez Villela, Miguel
    Welt, Frederick
    Stehlik, Josef
    Gilbert, Edward M.
    Wever-Pinzon, Omar
    Morshedzadeh, Jack H.
    Dranow, Elizabeth
    Selzman, Craig H.
    Fang, James C.
    Drakos, Stavros G.
    CIRCULATION, 2019, 140 (01) : 98 - 100
  • [23] Upfront Impella 5.0 vs. Prior Mechanical Circulatory Support Use in Cardiogenic Shock: A Single Center Experience
    Bashline, M. J.
    Kola, O.
    Kilic, A.
    Sciortino, C.
    Toma, C.
    Mulukutla, S.
    Fowler, J.
    Hickey, G.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2021, 40 (04): : S431 - S432
  • [24] Surgical technique for the implantation of mechanical circulatory support with the Impella 5.0 pump in a patient with post-cardiotomy cardiogenic shock
    Al Kalbani, Hamed
    Juvin, Charles
    Lebreton, Guillaume
    ANNALS OF CARDIOTHORACIC SURGERY, 2021, 10 (02) : 292 - 294
  • [25] COCAINE, IMPELLA, AND CARDIOGENIC SHOCK: EARLY ADOPTION OF IMPELLA CP AS TEMPORARY MECHANICAL CIRCULATORY SUPPORT
    Saugstad, Austin
    Wang, Melinda
    Vijaykrishnan, Rajakrishnan
    CHEST, 2023, 164 (04) : 598A - 599A
  • [26] Clinical Indications of IMPELLA Short-Term Mechanical Circulatory Support in a Tertiary Centre
    Vela, Maria Monteagudo
    Simon, Andre
    Gil, Fernando Riesgo
    Rosenberg, Alex
    Dalby, Miles
    Kabir, Tito
    Saez, Diana Garcia
    Panoulas, Vasileios
    CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE, 2020, 21 (05) : 629 - 637
  • [27] Cardiogenic shock-bridging with multimodality short term mechanical circulatory support
    Ahmed, H. Husnat
    Lim, S.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2018, 20 : 353 - 353
  • [28] Application of V-A ECMO therapies for short-term mechanical circulatory support in patients with cardiogenic shock
    Musial, Robert
    Darocha, Tomasz
    Kosinski, Sylweriusz
    Stolinski, Jaroslaw
    Sadowski, Jerzy
    Drwila, Rafal
    ANAESTHESIOLOGY INTENSIVE THERAPY, 2015, 47 (04) : 324 - 327
  • [29] Adoption of short-term mechanical circulatory support as a viable rescue effort for patients with refractory cardiogenic shock
    Canver, Charles C.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2017, 153 (04): : 763 - 764
  • [30] Cardiogenic Shock and Short-Term Mechanical Circulatory Support Options in the Current Era: Focus on Adverse Events
    Taleb, Iosif
    Koliopoulou, Antigone
    Tandar, Anwar
    McKellar, Stephen
    Nativi-Nicolau, Jose
    Athanasiadis, Dimitrios
    Wever-Pinzon, Omar
    Gilbert, Edward
    Fang, James
    Stehlik, Josef
    Tonna, Joseph
    Ibrahim, Homam
    Dranow, Elizabeth
    Selzman, Craig
    Welt, Frederick
    Drakos, Stavros
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE, 2018, 24 (08) : S127 - S127