MAPPinfo, mapping quality of health information: study protocol for a validation study of an assessment instrument

被引:4
|
作者
Kasper, Jurgen [1 ,2 ]
Luehnen, Julia [3 ]
Hinneburg, Jana [3 ]
Siebenhofer, Andrea [4 ,5 ]
Posch, Nicole [4 ]
Berger-Hoeger, Birte [3 ]
Grafe, Alexander [6 ]
Keppler, Jan [7 ]
Steckelberg, A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tromso, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Hlth & Caring Sci, Tromso, Norway
[2] Oslo Metropolitan Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Oslo, Norway
[3] Martin Luther Univ Hate Wittenberg, Hlth & Nursing Sci, Halle, Germany
[4] Med Univ Graz, Inst Gen Practice & Evidence Based Hlth Serv Res, Graz, Austria
[5] Goethe Univ, Inst Gen Practice, Frankfurt, Germany
[6] MSH Med Sch Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
[7] Christian Albrechts Univ Kiel, Inst Psychol, Kiel, Germany
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2020年 / 10卷 / 11期
关键词
information management; health & safety; information technology; PATIENT; BROCHURES;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040572
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Health information is a prerequisite of informed decision-making. Criteria for development, content and presentation have recently been published in a corresponding guideline. Within a systematic search, 27 relevant checklists were identified, none of them, however, complying with the guideline or providing reasonably operationalised measurement items. Therefore, a draft of a checklist with 19 criteria was drafted. The current study aims at developing and validating this measure of quality. Methods and analysis The validation design consists of five single studies to be conducted at the University of Halle-Wittenberg/Germany and Graz/Austria. (1) Achieving content validity through expert reviews of the first draft, (2) achieving feasibility using 'think aloud' in piloting with untrained users, (3) pretesting the instrument applied to health information materials without use of secondary sources: determining inter-rater reliability and criterion validity, (4) determining construct validity using information on proceedings and methods in the development process provided by the developers and (5) determining divergent validity in comparison with the Ensuring Quality Information for Patients (EQUIP) (expanded) Scale. The substudies will use varying samples of experts, students and developers and will apply the instrument to materials of various domains. Sample sizes will be adjusted to the particular research designs and questions. Analyses will employ qualitative methods, such as content analyses and discourse within the expert panel, and correlation-based methods both for determining inter-rater reliability and validity. Ethics and dissemination The project is approved by the ethics committee of the Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg (approval number: 2019 115). Results will be published, and the instrument made accessible on public health platforms. It is meant to become a certification standard. MAPPinfo can be used as a screening instrument without training or secondary sources. Although developed in the German language, the instrument will be applicable also in other languages. Protocol version July 2020.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Instrument Development and Validation of the Infant and Toddler Assessment for Quality Improvement
    Perlman, Michal
    Brunsek, Ashley
    Hepditch, Anne
    Gray, Karen
    Falenchuck, Olesya
    EARLY EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT, 2017, 28 (01): : 115 - 133
  • [42] Validation of the functional assessment of multiple sclerosis quality of life instrument
    Cella, DF
    Dineen, K
    Arnason, B
    Reder, A
    Webster, KA
    Karabatsos, G
    Chang, C
    Lloyd, S
    Mo, F
    Stewart, J
    Stefoski, D
    NEUROLOGY, 1996, 47 (01) : 129 - 139
  • [43] Accurate Measurement of Handwash Quality Using Sensor Armbands: Instrument Validation Study
    Wang, Chaofan
    Sarsenbayeva, Zhanna
    Chen, Xiuge
    Dingler, Tilman
    Goncalves, Jorge
    Kostakos, Vassilis
    JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH, 2020, 8 (03):
  • [44] Validation of the Measurement Characteristics in an Instrument for Power Quality Estimation-A Case Study
    Masnicki, Romuald
    ENERGIES, 2017, 10 (04):
  • [45] Health Information Technology Usability Evaluation Scale (Health-ITUES) for Usability Assessment of Mobile Health Technology: Validation Study
    Schnall, Rebecca
    Cho, Hwayoung
    Liu, Jianfang
    JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH, 2018, 6 (01):
  • [46] THE PATIENT ENABLEMENT INSTRUMENT - A VALIDATION STUDY
    Akesson, K.
    Hansson, E. Ekvall, Sr.
    Sunden, A.
    Stigmar, K.
    OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2018, 26 : S275 - S276
  • [47] Information Quality Management for the Medical Wearable Devices: Validation Study
    Alrae, Rawhi
    Abu Talib, Manar
    Nasir, Qassim
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INNOVATIONS IN COMPUTING RESEARCH (ICR'22), 2022, 1431 : 397 - 406
  • [48] Modification of medical outcome study (MOS) instrument for quality of life assessment & its validation in HIV infected individuals in India
    Kohli, RM
    Sane, S
    Kumar, K
    Paranjape, RS
    Mehendale, SM
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2005, 122 (04) : 297 - 304
  • [49] Subjective assessments of comorbidity correlate with quality of life health outcomes: Initial validation of a comorbidity assessment instrument
    Bayliss E.A.
    Ellis J.L.
    Steiner J.F.
    Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 3 (1)
  • [50] A Vocabulary for Describing Mapping Quality Assessment, Refinement and Validation
    Randles, Alex
    Junior, Ademar Crotti
    O'Sullivan, Declan
    2021 IEEE 15TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SEMANTIC COMPUTING (ICSC 2021), 2021, : 425 - 430