MAPPinfo, mapping quality of health information: study protocol for a validation study of an assessment instrument

被引:4
|
作者
Kasper, Jurgen [1 ,2 ]
Luehnen, Julia [3 ]
Hinneburg, Jana [3 ]
Siebenhofer, Andrea [4 ,5 ]
Posch, Nicole [4 ]
Berger-Hoeger, Birte [3 ]
Grafe, Alexander [6 ]
Keppler, Jan [7 ]
Steckelberg, A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tromso, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Hlth & Caring Sci, Tromso, Norway
[2] Oslo Metropolitan Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Oslo, Norway
[3] Martin Luther Univ Hate Wittenberg, Hlth & Nursing Sci, Halle, Germany
[4] Med Univ Graz, Inst Gen Practice & Evidence Based Hlth Serv Res, Graz, Austria
[5] Goethe Univ, Inst Gen Practice, Frankfurt, Germany
[6] MSH Med Sch Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
[7] Christian Albrechts Univ Kiel, Inst Psychol, Kiel, Germany
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2020年 / 10卷 / 11期
关键词
information management; health & safety; information technology; PATIENT; BROCHURES;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040572
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Health information is a prerequisite of informed decision-making. Criteria for development, content and presentation have recently been published in a corresponding guideline. Within a systematic search, 27 relevant checklists were identified, none of them, however, complying with the guideline or providing reasonably operationalised measurement items. Therefore, a draft of a checklist with 19 criteria was drafted. The current study aims at developing and validating this measure of quality. Methods and analysis The validation design consists of five single studies to be conducted at the University of Halle-Wittenberg/Germany and Graz/Austria. (1) Achieving content validity through expert reviews of the first draft, (2) achieving feasibility using 'think aloud' in piloting with untrained users, (3) pretesting the instrument applied to health information materials without use of secondary sources: determining inter-rater reliability and criterion validity, (4) determining construct validity using information on proceedings and methods in the development process provided by the developers and (5) determining divergent validity in comparison with the Ensuring Quality Information for Patients (EQUIP) (expanded) Scale. The substudies will use varying samples of experts, students and developers and will apply the instrument to materials of various domains. Sample sizes will be adjusted to the particular research designs and questions. Analyses will employ qualitative methods, such as content analyses and discourse within the expert panel, and correlation-based methods both for determining inter-rater reliability and validity. Ethics and dissemination The project is approved by the ethics committee of the Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg (approval number: 2019 115). Results will be published, and the instrument made accessible on public health platforms. It is meant to become a certification standard. MAPPinfo can be used as a screening instrument without training or secondary sources. Although developed in the German language, the instrument will be applicable also in other languages. Protocol version July 2020.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Perinatal mental health in India: protocol for a validation and cohort study
    Fellmeth, G.
    Kishore, M. T.
    Verma, A.
    Desai, G.
    Bharti, O.
    Kanwar, P.
    Singh, S.
    Thippeswamy, H.
    Chandra, P. S.
    Kurinczuk, J. J.
    Nair, M.
    Alderdice, F.
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 43 : 35 - 42
  • [32] Validation study of German inpatient administrative health data for epidemiological surveillance and measurement of quality of care for sepsis: the OPTIMISE study protocol
    Schwarzkopf, Daniel
    Fleischmann-Struzek, Carolin
    Schlattmann, Peter
    Dorow, Heike
    Ouart, Dominique
    Edel, Andreas
    Gonnert, Falk A.
    Goetz, Juergen
    Gruendling, Matthias
    Heim, Markus
    Jaschinski, Ulrich
    Lindau, Simone
    Meybohm, Patrick
    Putensen, Christian
    Sander, Michael
    Reinhart, Konrad
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (10):
  • [33] Software quality assessment model: a systematic mapping study
    Yan, Meng
    Xia, Xin
    Zhang, Xiaohong
    Xu, Ling
    Yang, Dan
    Li, Shanping
    SCIENCE CHINA-INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2019, 62 (09)
  • [34] Software quality assessment model: a systematic mapping study
    Meng Yan
    Xin Xia
    Xiaohong Zhang
    Ling Xu
    Dan Yang
    Shanping Li
    Science China Information Sciences, 2019, 62
  • [35] Software quality assessment model: a systematic mapping study
    Meng YAN
    Xin XIA
    Xiaohong ZHANG
    Ling XU
    Dan YANG
    Shanping LI
    ScienceChina(InformationSciences), 2019, 62 (09) : 5 - 22
  • [36] Evaluation of Generative Language Models in Personalizing Medical Information: Instrument Validation Study
    Spina, Aidin
    Andalib, Saman
    Flores, Daniel
    Vermani, Rishi
    Halaseh, Faris F.
    Nelson, M.
    JMIR AI, 2024, 3
  • [37] An empirical study of the measurement and instrument validation of perceived strategy value of information systems
    Subramanian, GH
    Nosek, JT
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2001, 41 (03) : 64 - 69
  • [38] A Health Information Quality Assessment Tool for Korean Online Newspaper Articles: Development Study
    Lee, Naae
    Oh, Seung-Won
    Cho, Belong
    Myung, Seung-Kwon
    Hwang, Seung-Sik
    Yoon, Goo Hyeon
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2021, 23 (07)
  • [39] A PSYCHOMETRIC STUDY: THE VALIDATION OF A SCHOOL QUALITY ASSESSMENT TOOL
    Berbar, H.
    Lotfi, S.
    Essaoudi, M.
    Talbi, M.
    OBRAZOVANIE I NAUKA-EDUCATION AND SCIENCE, 2022, 24 (04): : 112 - 139
  • [40] Holistic assessment of narrative quality: A social validation study
    Olness, GS
    Ulatowska, HK
    Carpenter, CM
    Williams-Hubbard, LJ
    Dykes, JC
    APHASIOLOGY, 2005, 19 (3-5) : 251 - 262