MAPPinfo, mapping quality of health information: study protocol for a validation study of an assessment instrument

被引:4
|
作者
Kasper, Jurgen [1 ,2 ]
Luehnen, Julia [3 ]
Hinneburg, Jana [3 ]
Siebenhofer, Andrea [4 ,5 ]
Posch, Nicole [4 ]
Berger-Hoeger, Birte [3 ]
Grafe, Alexander [6 ]
Keppler, Jan [7 ]
Steckelberg, A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tromso, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Hlth & Caring Sci, Tromso, Norway
[2] Oslo Metropolitan Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Oslo, Norway
[3] Martin Luther Univ Hate Wittenberg, Hlth & Nursing Sci, Halle, Germany
[4] Med Univ Graz, Inst Gen Practice & Evidence Based Hlth Serv Res, Graz, Austria
[5] Goethe Univ, Inst Gen Practice, Frankfurt, Germany
[6] MSH Med Sch Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
[7] Christian Albrechts Univ Kiel, Inst Psychol, Kiel, Germany
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2020年 / 10卷 / 11期
关键词
information management; health & safety; information technology; PATIENT; BROCHURES;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040572
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Health information is a prerequisite of informed decision-making. Criteria for development, content and presentation have recently been published in a corresponding guideline. Within a systematic search, 27 relevant checklists were identified, none of them, however, complying with the guideline or providing reasonably operationalised measurement items. Therefore, a draft of a checklist with 19 criteria was drafted. The current study aims at developing and validating this measure of quality. Methods and analysis The validation design consists of five single studies to be conducted at the University of Halle-Wittenberg/Germany and Graz/Austria. (1) Achieving content validity through expert reviews of the first draft, (2) achieving feasibility using 'think aloud' in piloting with untrained users, (3) pretesting the instrument applied to health information materials without use of secondary sources: determining inter-rater reliability and criterion validity, (4) determining construct validity using information on proceedings and methods in the development process provided by the developers and (5) determining divergent validity in comparison with the Ensuring Quality Information for Patients (EQUIP) (expanded) Scale. The substudies will use varying samples of experts, students and developers and will apply the instrument to materials of various domains. Sample sizes will be adjusted to the particular research designs and questions. Analyses will employ qualitative methods, such as content analyses and discourse within the expert panel, and correlation-based methods both for determining inter-rater reliability and validity. Ethics and dissemination The project is approved by the ethics committee of the Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg (approval number: 2019 115). Results will be published, and the instrument made accessible on public health platforms. It is meant to become a certification standard. MAPPinfo can be used as a screening instrument without training or secondary sources. Although developed in the German language, the instrument will be applicable also in other languages. Protocol version July 2020.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [22] Validation of neuropsychological tests for the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study Harmonized Cognitive Assessment Protocol
    Meng, Qinqin
    Wang, Huali
    Strauss, John
    Langa, Kenneth M.
    Chen, Xinxin
    Wang, Mingwei
    Qu, Qiumin
    Chen, Wei
    Kuang, Weihong
    Zhang, Nan
    Li, Tao
    Wang, Yafeng
    Zhao, Yaohui
    INTERNATIONAL PSYCHOGERIATRICS, 2019, 31 (12) : 1709 - 1719
  • [23] ASSESSMENT OF THE QUALITY AND VARIABILITY OF HEALTH INFORMATION ON CHRONIC PAIN WEBSITES USING THE DISCERN INSTRUMENT
    Kaicker, J.
    Debono, V. Borg
    Dang, W.
    Buckley, N.
    Thabane, L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2011, 173 : S205 - S205
  • [24] Assessment of the quality and variability of health information on chronic pain websites using the DISCERN instrument
    Jatin Kaicker
    Victoria Borg Debono
    Wilfred Dang
    Norman Buckley
    Lehana Thabane
    BMC Medicine, 8
  • [25] Assessment of the quality and variability of health information on chronic pain websites using the DISCERN instrument
    Kaicker, Jatin
    Debono, Victoria Borg
    Dang, Wilfred
    Buckley, Norman
    Thabane, Lehana
    BMC MEDICINE, 2010, 8
  • [26] Parsimonious and efficient assessment of health-related quality of life in osteoarthritis research: validation of the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) instrument
    Kathryn Whitfield
    Rachelle Buchbinder
    Leonie Segal
    Richard H Osborne
    Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 4
  • [27] Parsimonious and efficient assessment of health-related quality of life in osteoarthritis research: validation of the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) instrument
    Whitfield, Kathryn
    Buchbinder, Rachelle
    Segal, Leonie
    Osborne, Richard H.
    HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2006, 4 (1)
  • [28] Instrument for objective assessment of appropriateness of surgical bed occupancy: validation study
    Alijani, A
    Hanna, GB
    Ziyaie, D
    Burns, SL
    Campbell, KL
    McMurdo, MET
    Cuschieri, A
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 326 (7401): : 1243 - 1244
  • [29] Assessment of software measurement: an information quality study
    Berry, M
    Jeffery, R
    Aurum, A
    10TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON SOFTWARE METRICS, PROCEEDINGS, 2004, : 314 - 325
  • [30] Development and validation of a Chinese version chronic wound health-related quality of life instrument: A methodological study
    Hung, Chang-Chiao
    Chen, Chien-Ming
    Chang, Ya-Hui
    Lee, Shiao-Haung
    Chang, Chia-Hao
    Chen, Yea-Jyh
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2024, 33 (05) : 1820 - 1829