MAPPinfo, mapping quality of health information: study protocol for a validation study of an assessment instrument

被引:4
|
作者
Kasper, Jurgen [1 ,2 ]
Luehnen, Julia [3 ]
Hinneburg, Jana [3 ]
Siebenhofer, Andrea [4 ,5 ]
Posch, Nicole [4 ]
Berger-Hoeger, Birte [3 ]
Grafe, Alexander [6 ]
Keppler, Jan [7 ]
Steckelberg, A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tromso, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Hlth & Caring Sci, Tromso, Norway
[2] Oslo Metropolitan Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Oslo, Norway
[3] Martin Luther Univ Hate Wittenberg, Hlth & Nursing Sci, Halle, Germany
[4] Med Univ Graz, Inst Gen Practice & Evidence Based Hlth Serv Res, Graz, Austria
[5] Goethe Univ, Inst Gen Practice, Frankfurt, Germany
[6] MSH Med Sch Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
[7] Christian Albrechts Univ Kiel, Inst Psychol, Kiel, Germany
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2020年 / 10卷 / 11期
关键词
information management; health & safety; information technology; PATIENT; BROCHURES;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040572
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Health information is a prerequisite of informed decision-making. Criteria for development, content and presentation have recently been published in a corresponding guideline. Within a systematic search, 27 relevant checklists were identified, none of them, however, complying with the guideline or providing reasonably operationalised measurement items. Therefore, a draft of a checklist with 19 criteria was drafted. The current study aims at developing and validating this measure of quality. Methods and analysis The validation design consists of five single studies to be conducted at the University of Halle-Wittenberg/Germany and Graz/Austria. (1) Achieving content validity through expert reviews of the first draft, (2) achieving feasibility using 'think aloud' in piloting with untrained users, (3) pretesting the instrument applied to health information materials without use of secondary sources: determining inter-rater reliability and criterion validity, (4) determining construct validity using information on proceedings and methods in the development process provided by the developers and (5) determining divergent validity in comparison with the Ensuring Quality Information for Patients (EQUIP) (expanded) Scale. The substudies will use varying samples of experts, students and developers and will apply the instrument to materials of various domains. Sample sizes will be adjusted to the particular research designs and questions. Analyses will employ qualitative methods, such as content analyses and discourse within the expert panel, and correlation-based methods both for determining inter-rater reliability and validity. Ethics and dissemination The project is approved by the ethics committee of the Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg (approval number: 2019 115). Results will be published, and the instrument made accessible on public health platforms. It is meant to become a certification standard. MAPPinfo can be used as a screening instrument without training or secondary sources. Although developed in the German language, the instrument will be applicable also in other languages. Protocol version July 2020.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] MAPPinfo - mapping quality of health information: Validation study of an assessment instrument
    Kasper, Jurgen
    Luehnen, Julia
    Hinneburg, Jana
    Siebenhofer, Andrea
    Posch, Nicole
    Berger-Hoeger, Birte
    Grafe, Alexander
    Smastuen, Milada Cvancarova
    Steckelberg, Anke
    PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (10):
  • [2] STUDY PROTOCOL FOR THE WORLD-HEALTH-ORGANIZATION PROJECT TO DEVELOP A QUALITY-OF-LIFE ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENT (WHOQOL)
    HERRMAN, H
    METELKO, Z
    SZABO, S
    RAJKUMAR, S
    KUMAR, S
    VANHECK, G
    DEVRIES, J
    SUCRE, A
    KABANOV
    LOMACHENKOV
    BURKOVSKY
    SUKWATANA, S
    MEESAPYA, K
    SKEVINGTON, S
    PATRICK, D
    MARTIN, M
    MUTAMBIRWA, J
    SARTORIUS, N
    ORLEY, J
    KUYKEN, W
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 1993, 2 (02) : 153 - 159
  • [3] The World Health Organization Quality of Life assessment instrument (WHOQOL-100): Validation study with the Dutch version
    DeVries, J
    VanHeck, GL
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 1997, 13 (03) : 164 - 178
  • [4] Development and validation of the health-related quality of life instrument for Chinese infertile couples: a mixed-methods study protocol
    Zhao Shi
    Zhuxin Mao
    Hongwei Nie
    Ling Geng
    Gang Chen
    Shunping Li
    Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 20
  • [5] Development and validation of the health-related quality of life instrument for Chinese infertile couples: a mixed-methods study protocol
    Shi, Zhao
    Mao, Zhuxin
    Nie, Hongwei
    Geng, Ling
    Chen, Gang
    Li, Shunping
    HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2022, 20 (01)
  • [6] Information technology sophistication in health care:: an instrument validation study among Canadian hospitals
    Paré, G
    Sicotte, C
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2001, 63 (03) : 205 - 223
  • [7] Clinical information quality of digital health technologies: protocol for an international eDelphi study
    Fadahunsi, Kayode Philip
    Wark, Petra A.
    Mastellos, Nikolaos
    Gallagher, Joseph
    Majeed, Azeem
    Car, Josip
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (04):
  • [8] Information security culture - validation of an assessment instrument
    da Veiga, A.
    Martins, N.
    Eloff, J. H. P.
    SOUTHERN AFRICAN BUSINESS REVIEW, 2007, 11 (01) : 147 - 166
  • [9] A health-related quality-of-life instrument for symptomatic patients with endometriosis: A validation study
    Colwell, HH
    Mathias, SD
    Pasta, DJ
    Henning, JM
    Steege, JF
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1998, 179 (01) : 47 - 55
  • [10] Validation of the Italian Clinical Learning Environment Instrument (SVIAT): study protocol
    Palese, Alvisa
    Destrebecq, Anne
    Terzoni, Stefano
    Grassetti, Luca
    Altini, Pietro
    Bevilacqua, Anita
    Brugnolli, Anna
    Benaglio, Carla
    Dalponte, Adriana
    De Biasio, Laura
    Dimonte, Valeria
    Gambacorti, Benedetta
    Fasci, Adriana
    Grosso, Silvia
    Mansutti, Irene
    Mantovan, Franco
    Marognolli, Oliva
    Montalti, Sandra
    Nicotera, Raffaela
    Perli, Serena
    Randon, Giulia
    Stampfl, Brigitte
    Tollini, Morena
    Canzan, Federica
    Zannini, Lucia
    Saiani, Luisa
    ASSISTENZA INFERMIERISTICA E RICERCA, 2016, 35 (01) : 29 - 35