Low energy mammogram obtained in contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM) is comparable to routine full-field digital mammography (FFDM)

被引:110
|
作者
Francescone, Mark A. [1 ]
Jochelson, Maxine S. [2 ]
Dershaw, D. David [2 ]
Sung, Janice S. [2 ]
Hughes, Mary C. [2 ]
Zheng, Junting [2 ]
Moskowitz, Chaya [2 ]
Morris, Elizabeth A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Med Ctr, New York, NY 10019 USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, New York, NY 10065 USA
关键词
Mammography/methods; Contrast media; Breast neoplasms/diagnosis; Radiography; Dual-energy scanned projection/methods; AGREEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.05.015
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: Contrast enhanced digital mammography (CEDM) uses low energy and high energy exposures to produce a subtracted contrast image. It is currently performed with a standard full-field digital mammogram (FFDM). The purpose is to determine if the low energy image performed after intravenous iodine injection can replace the standard FFDM. Methods: And Materials: In an IRB approved HIPAA compatible study, low-energy CEDM images of 170 breasts in 88 women (ages 26-75; mean 50.3) undergoing evaluation for elevated risk or newly diagnosed breast cancer were compared to standard digital mammograms performed within 6 months. Technical parameters including posterior nipple line (PNL) distance, compression thickness, and compression force on the MLO projection were compared. Mammographic findings were compared qualitatively and quantitatively. Mixed linear regression using generalized estimating equation (GEE) method was performed. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) with 95% confidence interval (95%CI) were estimated to assess agreement. Results: No statistical difference was found in the technical parameters compression thickness, PNL distance, compression force (p-values: 0.767, 0.947, 0.089). No difference was found in the measured size of mammographic findings (p-values 0.982-0.988). Grouped calcifications had a mean size/extent of 2.1 cm (SD 0.6) in the low-energy contrast images, and a mean size/extent of 2.2 cm (SD 0.6) in the standard digital mammogram images. Masses had a mean size of 1.8 cm (SD 0.2) in both groups. Calcifications were equally visible on both CEDM and FFDM. Conclusion: Low energy CEDM images are equivalent to standard FFDM despite the presence of intravenous iodinated contrast. Low energy CEDM images may be used for interpretation in place of the FFDM, thereby reducing patient dose. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1350 / 1355
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of Radiologist Performance with Photon-Counting Full-Field Digital Mammography to Conventional Full-Field Digital Mammography
    Cole, Elodia B.
    Toledano, Alicia Y.
    Lundqvist, Mats
    Pisano, Etta D.
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2012, 19 (08) : 916 - 922
  • [32] Enhancement of microcalcifications in full-field digital mammography by energy subtraction
    Diekmann, F
    Diekmann, S
    Bick, U
    Hamm, B
    DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 577 - 580
  • [33] Comparison of slot scanning digital mammography system with full-field digital mammography system
    Lai, Chao-Jen
    Shaw, Chris C.
    Geiser, William
    Chen, Lingyun
    Arribas, Elsa
    Stephens, Tanya
    Davis, Paul L.
    Ayyar, Geetha P.
    Dogan, Basak E.
    Nguyen, Victoria A.
    Whitman, Gary J.
    Yang, Wei T.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 35 (06) : 2339 - 2346
  • [34] Contrast-detail evaluation of a full-field digital mammography system
    Darambara, DG
    Taibi, A
    Speller, RD
    Gambaccini, M
    1999 IEEE NUCLEAR SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM - CONFERENCE RECORD, VOLS 1-3, 1999, : 217 - 221
  • [35] Contrast-detail evaluation of a full-field digital mammography system
    Darambara, DG
    Taibi, A
    Speller, RD
    Gambaccini, M
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE, 2000, 47 (03) : 870 - 876
  • [36] Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography in routine clinical practice in 2013
    Badr, S.
    Laurent, N.
    Regis, C.
    Boulanger, L.
    Lemaille, S.
    Poncelet, E.
    DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL IMAGING, 2014, 95 (03) : 245 - 258
  • [37] Advantages of gridless full-field digital mammography
    Nykanen, KM
    Siltanen, S
    RADIOLOGY, 2002, 225 : 120 - 121
  • [38] Mammographic Artifacts on Full-Field Digital Mammography
    Choi, Jae Jeong
    Kim, Sung Hun
    Kang, Bong Joo
    Choi, Byung Gil
    Song, ByungJoo
    Jung, Haijo
    JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING, 2014, 27 (02) : 231 - 236
  • [39] Current status of full-field digital mammography
    Pisano, ED
    RADIOLOGY, 2000, 214 (01) : 26 - 28
  • [40] Mammographic Artifacts on Full-Field Digital Mammography
    Jae Jeong Choi
    Sung Hun Kim
    Bong Joo Kang
    Byung Gil Choi
    ByungJoo Song
    Haijo Jung
    Journal of Digital Imaging, 2014, 27 : 231 - 236