Low energy mammogram obtained in contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM) is comparable to routine full-field digital mammography (FFDM)

被引:110
|
作者
Francescone, Mark A. [1 ]
Jochelson, Maxine S. [2 ]
Dershaw, D. David [2 ]
Sung, Janice S. [2 ]
Hughes, Mary C. [2 ]
Zheng, Junting [2 ]
Moskowitz, Chaya [2 ]
Morris, Elizabeth A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Med Ctr, New York, NY 10019 USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, New York, NY 10065 USA
关键词
Mammography/methods; Contrast media; Breast neoplasms/diagnosis; Radiography; Dual-energy scanned projection/methods; AGREEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.05.015
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: Contrast enhanced digital mammography (CEDM) uses low energy and high energy exposures to produce a subtracted contrast image. It is currently performed with a standard full-field digital mammogram (FFDM). The purpose is to determine if the low energy image performed after intravenous iodine injection can replace the standard FFDM. Methods: And Materials: In an IRB approved HIPAA compatible study, low-energy CEDM images of 170 breasts in 88 women (ages 26-75; mean 50.3) undergoing evaluation for elevated risk or newly diagnosed breast cancer were compared to standard digital mammograms performed within 6 months. Technical parameters including posterior nipple line (PNL) distance, compression thickness, and compression force on the MLO projection were compared. Mammographic findings were compared qualitatively and quantitatively. Mixed linear regression using generalized estimating equation (GEE) method was performed. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) with 95% confidence interval (95%CI) were estimated to assess agreement. Results: No statistical difference was found in the technical parameters compression thickness, PNL distance, compression force (p-values: 0.767, 0.947, 0.089). No difference was found in the measured size of mammographic findings (p-values 0.982-0.988). Grouped calcifications had a mean size/extent of 2.1 cm (SD 0.6) in the low-energy contrast images, and a mean size/extent of 2.2 cm (SD 0.6) in the standard digital mammogram images. Masses had a mean size of 1.8 cm (SD 0.2) in both groups. Calcifications were equally visible on both CEDM and FFDM. Conclusion: Low energy CEDM images are equivalent to standard FFDM despite the presence of intravenous iodinated contrast. Low energy CEDM images may be used for interpretation in place of the FFDM, thereby reducing patient dose. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1350 / 1355
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Advanced applications of digital mammography: Tomosynthesis and contrast-enhanced digital mammography
    Lewin, John M.
    Niklason, Loren
    SEMINARS IN ROENTGENOLOGY, 2007, 42 (04) : 243 - 252
  • [22] Tomosynthesis and contrast-enhanced digital mammography: recent advances in digital mammography
    Felix Diekmann
    Ulrich Bick
    European Radiology, 2007, 17 : 3086 - 3092
  • [23] Tomosynthesis and contrast-enhanced digital mammography: recent advances in digital mammography
    Diekmann, Felix
    Bick, Ulrich
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2007, 17 (12) : 3086 - 3092
  • [24] Comparative Analysis of Diagnostic Performance of Automatic Breast Ultrasound, Full-Field Digital Mammography and Contrast-Enhanced Mammography in Relation to Breast Composition
    Pawlak, Marta Ewa
    Rudnicki, Wojciech
    Borkowska, Anna
    Skubisz, Karolina
    Rydzyk, Rafal
    Luczynska, Elzbieta
    BIOMEDICINES, 2023, 11 (12)
  • [25] Detection and characterization of microcalcification with film-screen and full-field digital mammography (FFDM)
    O'Riordan, E
    Bukhanov, K
    Wilson, C
    Sidlofsky, S
    Goldberg, F
    Muradali, D
    RADIOLOGY, 2000, 217 : 200 - 200
  • [26] Evaluation of contrast-enhanced digital mammography
    Diekmann, Felix
    Freyer, Martin
    Diekmann, Susanne
    Fallenberg, Eva M.
    Fischer, Thomas
    Bick, Ulrich
    Poellinger, Alexander
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2011, 78 (01) : 112 - 121
  • [27] Contrast-enhanced digital mammography and angiogenesis
    Rosado-Mendez, I.
    Palma, B. A.
    Villasenor, Y.
    Benitez-Bribiesca, L.
    Brandan, M. E.
    NUCLEAR PHYSICS METHODS AND ACCELERATORS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2007, 958 : 278 - +
  • [28] Contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM): Imaging modeling, computer simulations, and phantom study
    Chen, B
    Jing, ZX
    Smith, A
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2005: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, PTS 1 AND 2, 2005, 5745 : 877 - 888
  • [29] Comparative Low-Contrast Performance of Scan Equalization Digital Mammography (SEDM) v.s. Full-Field Digital Mammography (FFDM): A Simulation Study with Micro-Calcifications
    Liu, X.
    Lai, C.
    Shaw, C.
    Shen, Y.
    Zhong, Y.
    Yi, Y.
    Ge, S.
    You, Z.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2011, 38 (06) : 3378 - +
  • [30] Improved detection of low contrast objects with full-field digital mammography compared to film-screen mammography
    Niklason, LT
    OpsahlOng, B
    Landberg, C
    Castleberry, DE
    Venkatakrishnan, V
    Kopans, DB
    RADIOLOGY, 1997, 205 : 1249 - 1249