A comparison of four reconstruction methods for JET neutron and gamma tomography

被引：55
|
作者：
Craciunescu, T. [1 ]
Bonheure, G. [2 ]
Kiptily, V. [3 ]
Murari, A. [4 ]
Tiseanu, I. [1 ]
Zoita, V. [1 ]
Contributors, JET-EFDA [5 ]
机构：
[1] EURATOM MEdC Assoc, Natl Inst Laser Plasma & Radiat Phys, Bucharest, Romania
[2] Euratom Belgian State Assoc LPP ERM KMS, TEC, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium
[3] EURATOM UKAEA Assoc, Culham Sci Ctr, Abingdon, Oxon, England
[4] Assoc ENEA Euratom Fus, Consorzio RFX, Padua, Italy
[5] JET EFDA Culham Sci Ctr, Abingdon OX14 3DB, Oxon, England
来源：
NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION A-ACCELERATORS SPECTROMETERS DETECTORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT | 2009年 / 605卷 / 03期
基金：
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词：
Tomography; Tokamak neutron and gamma plasma; diagnostics; X-RAY TOMOGRAPHY; MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD; TRITIUM; REGULARIZATION; TRANSPORT; PROFILES; EMISSION; IONS;
D O I：
10.1016/j.nima.2009.03.224
中图分类号：
TH7 [仪器、仪表];
学科分类号：
0804 ; 080401 ; 081102 ;
摘要：
The JET neutron profile monitor coverage of the neutron/gamma emissive region enables tomographic reconstruction. However, due to the availability of only two projection angles and to the coarse sampling, tomography is a highly limited data set problem. A comparative study concerning the applicability to JET tomography of four methods-maximum likelihood, maximum entropy, Tikhonov regularization and a Monte Carlo back-projection algorithm-is reported. The methods have been tested on numerically simulated phantoms with shapes characteristic for this kind of tomography. The retrieval of sophisticated structures in the emissive distribution has been addressed in order to have a complete image of the quality and reliability of the methods. A both qualitative and quantitative evaluation is reported. (C) 2009 Craciunescu. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：374 / 383
页数：10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Digital Neutron-Gamma Discrimination Methods: Charge Comparison versus Zero-Crossing
    Szczcsniak, T.
    Grodzicka, M.
    Moszynski, M.
    Wolski, D.
    Swiderski, L.
    Szawlowski, M.
    Schotanus, P.
    2014 IEEE NUCLEAR SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM AND MEDICAL IMAGING CONFERENCE (NSS/MIC), 2014,
  • [42] MeV-range velocity-space tomography from gamma-ray and neutron emission spectrometry measurements at JET
    Salewski, M.
    Nocente, M.
    Jacobsen, A. S.
    Binda, F.
    Cazzaniga, C.
    Ericsson, G.
    Eriksson, J.
    Gorini, G.
    Hellesen, C.
    Hjalmarsson, A.
    Kiptily, V. G.
    Koskela, T.
    Korsholm, S. B.
    Kurki-Suonio, T.
    Leipold, F.
    Madsen, J.
    Moseev, D.
    Nielsen, S. K.
    Rasmussen, J.
    Schneider, M.
    Sharapov, S. E.
    Stejner, M.
    Tardocchi, M.
    Abduallev, S.
    Abhangi, M.
    Abreu, P.
    Afzal, M.
    Aggarwal, K. M.
    Ahlgren, T.
    Ahn, J. H.
    Aho-Mantila, L.
    Aiba, N.
    Airila, M.
    Albanese, R.
    Aldred, V.
    Alegre, D.
    Alessi, E.
    Aleynikov, P.
    Alfier, A.
    Alkseev, A.
    Allinson, M.
    Alper, B.
    Alves, E.
    Ambrosino, G.
    Ambrosino, R.
    Amicucci, L.
    Amosov, V.
    Sunden, E. Andersson
    Angelone, M.
    Anghel, M.
    NUCLEAR FUSION, 2017, 57 (05)
  • [43] Subtraction of single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) in radioembolization: a comparison of four methods
    Kerckhaert, Camiel E. M.
    de Jong, Hugo W. A. M.
    Meddens, Marjolein B. M.
    van Rooij, Rob
    Smits, Maarten L. J.
    Rakvongthai, Yothin
    Dietze, Martijn M. A.
    EJNMMI PHYSICS, 2024, 11 (01):
  • [44] Comparison of deconvolution techniques for 1D neutron emission profile reconstruction using ITER Radial Neutron Camera synthetic data and JET neutron camera measurements
    Mikszuta-Michalik, Katarzyna
    Marocco, Daniele
    Esposito, Basilio
    JET Contributors
    PLASMA PHYSICS AND CONTROLLED FUSION, 2025, 67 (04)
  • [45] A parametric model for fusion neutron emissivity tomography for the KN3 neutron camera at JET
    Ronchi, E.
    Conroy, S.
    Sunden, E. Andersson
    Ericsson, G.
    Johnson, M. Gatu
    Hellesen, C.
    Sjostrand, H.
    Weiszflog, M.
    NUCLEAR FUSION, 2010, 50 (03)
  • [46] Multispectral reconstruction methods for quantitative photoacoustic tomography
    Malone, Emma
    Cox, Ben
    Arridge, Simon
    PHOTONS PLUS ULTRASOUND: IMAGING AND SENSING 2016, 2016, 9708
  • [47] Fast Approximation of Algebraic Reconstruction Methods for Tomography
    Batenburg, Kees Joost
    Plantagie, Linda
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING, 2012, 21 (08) : 3648 - 3658
  • [48] Pragmatic reconstruction methods in atom probe tomography
    Vurpillot, F.
    Gruber, M.
    Da Costa, G.
    Martin, I.
    Renaud, L.
    Bostel, A.
    ULTRAMICROSCOPY, 2011, 111 (08) : 1286 - 1294
  • [49] On the convergence of algebraic reconstruction methods for computer tomography
    Boschen, F
    Kummert, A
    Herzog, H
    Galkowski, K
    Fourth International Workshop on Multidimensional Systems - NDS 2005, 2005, : 172 - 177
  • [50] Algebraic and analytic reconstruction methods for dynamic tomography
    Desbat, L.
    Rit, S.
    Clackdoyle, R.
    Mennessier, C.
    Promayon, E.
    Ntalampeki, S.
    2007 ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY, VOLS 1-16, 2007, : 726 - +
12345