A comparison of four reconstruction methods for JET neutron and gamma tomography

被引：55

作者：

Craciunescu, T. ^{[1
]}

Bonheure, G. ^{[2
]}

Kiptily, V. ^{[3
]}

Murari, A. ^{[4
]}

Tiseanu, I. ^{[1
]}

Zoita, V. ^{[1
]}

Contributors, JET-EFDA ^{[5
]}

机构：

[1] EURATOM MEdC Assoc, Natl Inst Laser Plasma & Radiat Phys, Bucharest, Romania

[2] Euratom Belgian State Assoc LPP ERM KMS, TEC, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium

[3] EURATOM UKAEA Assoc, Culham Sci Ctr, Abingdon, Oxon, England

[4] Assoc ENEA Euratom Fus, Consorzio RFX, Padua, Italy

[5] JET EFDA Culham Sci Ctr, Abingdon OX14 3DB, Oxon, England

来源：

NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION A-ACCELERATORS SPECTROMETERS DETECTORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT | 2009年 / 605卷 / 03期

基金：

英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;

关键词：

Tomography; Tokamak neutron and gamma plasma; diagnostics; X-RAY TOMOGRAPHY; MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD; TRITIUM; REGULARIZATION; TRANSPORT; PROFILES; EMISSION; IONS;

D O I：

10.1016/j.nima.2009.03.224

中图分类号：

TH7 [仪器、仪表];

学科分类号：

0804 ; 080401 ; 081102 ;

摘要：

The JET neutron profile monitor coverage of the neutron/gamma emissive region enables tomographic reconstruction. However, due to the availability of only two projection angles and to the coarse sampling, tomography is a highly limited data set problem. A comparative study concerning the applicability to JET tomography of four methods-maximum likelihood, maximum entropy, Tikhonov regularization and a Monte Carlo back-projection algorithm-is reported. The methods have been tested on numerically simulated phantoms with shapes characteristic for this kind of tomography. The retrieval of sophisticated structures in the emissive distribution has been addressed in order to have a complete image of the quality and reliability of the methods. A both qualitative and quantitative evaluation is reported. (C) 2009 Craciunescu. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：374 / 383

页数：10

共 50 条

[31] Iterative Reconstruction Methods in Computed Tomography
Stayman, J.
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (06) : 3992 - 3993
[32] Geometric reconstruction methods for electron tomography
Alpers, Andreas
Gardner, Richard J.
Koenig, Stefan
Pennington, Robert S.
Boothroyd, Chris B.
Houben, Lothar
Dunin-Borkowski, Rafal E.
Batenburg, Kees Joost
ULTRAMICROSCOPY, 2013, 128 : 42 - 54
[33] Gamma In Addition to Neutron Tomography (GIANT) at the NECTAR instrument
Richi Kumar
Lucas Sommer
Anton S. Tremsin
Adrian S. Losko
Scientific Reports, 13
[34] Gamma In Addition to Neutron Tomography (GIANT) at the NECTAR instrument
Kumar, Richi
Sommer, Lucas
Tremsin, Anton S.
Losko, Adrian S.
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01)
[35] Neutron induced gamma-ray emission tomography
Balogun, FA
Spyrou, NM
Adesanmi, CA
NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION B-BEAM INTERACTIONS WITH MATERIALS AND ATOMS, 1996, 114 (3-4): : 387 - 393
[36] A Preliminary Study of Iterative Reconstruction Algorithms for Neutron Tomography
Lee, S. W.
Pan, J.
Liu, C.
Zhou, T.
Sim, C. M.
Jiang, M.
NEUTRON RADIOGRAPHY, 2008, : 146 - +
[37] High quality reconstruction for neutron computerized tomography images
Soliman, Salwa R.
Zayed, Hala H.
Selim, Mazen M.
Kasban, H.
Mongy, T.
ALEXANDRIA ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2021, 60 (02) : 2041 - 2064
[38] Computed tomography reconstruction technology for neutron penumbral imaging
Yu B.
Huang T.
Chen B.
Su M.
Jiang W.
Liu S.
Guangxue Xuebao/Acta Optica Sinica, 2011, 31 (11): : 1111001 - 1
[39] Monitoring of Snowpack Dynamics With Cosmic-Ray Neutron Probes: A Comparison of Four Conversion Methods
Bogena, Heye R.
Herrmann, Frank
Jakobi, Jannis
Brogi, Cosimo
Ilias, Andreas
Huisman, Johan Alexander
Panagopoulos, Andreas
Pisinaras, Vassilios
FRONTIERS IN WATER, 2020, 2
[40] Comparison of four NDT methods for indication of reactor steel degradation by high fluences of neutron irradiation
Tomas, I.
Vertesy, G.
Barroso, S. Pirfo
Kobayashi, S.
NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2013, 265 : 201 - 209

← 1 2 3 4 5 →