A comparison of four reconstruction methods for JET neutron and gamma tomography

被引:55
|
作者
Craciunescu, T. [1 ]
Bonheure, G. [2 ]
Kiptily, V. [3 ]
Murari, A. [4 ]
Tiseanu, I. [1 ]
Zoita, V. [1 ]
Contributors, JET-EFDA [5 ]
机构
[1] EURATOM MEdC Assoc, Natl Inst Laser Plasma & Radiat Phys, Bucharest, Romania
[2] Euratom Belgian State Assoc LPP ERM KMS, TEC, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium
[3] EURATOM UKAEA Assoc, Culham Sci Ctr, Abingdon, Oxon, England
[4] Assoc ENEA Euratom Fus, Consorzio RFX, Padua, Italy
[5] JET EFDA Culham Sci Ctr, Abingdon OX14 3DB, Oxon, England
来源
NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION A-ACCELERATORS SPECTROMETERS DETECTORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT | 2009年 / 605卷 / 03期
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Tomography; Tokamak neutron and gamma plasma; diagnostics; X-RAY TOMOGRAPHY; MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD; TRITIUM; REGULARIZATION; TRANSPORT; PROFILES; EMISSION; IONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.nima.2009.03.224
中图分类号
TH7 [仪器、仪表];
学科分类号
0804 ; 080401 ; 081102 ;
摘要
The JET neutron profile monitor coverage of the neutron/gamma emissive region enables tomographic reconstruction. However, due to the availability of only two projection angles and to the coarse sampling, tomography is a highly limited data set problem. A comparative study concerning the applicability to JET tomography of four methods-maximum likelihood, maximum entropy, Tikhonov regularization and a Monte Carlo back-projection algorithm-is reported. The methods have been tested on numerically simulated phantoms with shapes characteristic for this kind of tomography. The retrieval of sophisticated structures in the emissive distribution has been addressed in order to have a complete image of the quality and reliability of the methods. A both qualitative and quantitative evaluation is reported. (C) 2009 Craciunescu. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:374 / 383
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] CT angiography for evaluation of living renal donors: Comparison of four reconstruction methods
    Kim, JK
    Kim, JH
    Bae, SJ
    Cho, KS
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2004, 183 (02) : 471 - 477
  • [22] Evaluation of outcome after immediate breast reconstruction: Prospective comparison of four methods
    Gui, GPH
    Kadayaprath, G
    Tan, SM
    Faliakou, EC
    Choy, C
    A'Hern, R
    Ward, A
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2005, 115 (07) : 1916 - 1926
  • [23] Comparison of four reconstruction methods after total sacrectomy: A finite element study
    Zhu, Rui
    Cheng, Li-ming
    Yu, Yan
    Zander, Thomas
    Chen, Bo
    Rohlmann, Antonius
    CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2012, 27 (08) : 771 - 776
  • [24] Reconstruction corrections in advanced neutron tomography algorithms
    Rosa, R
    Chirco, P
    Massari, R
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE, 2005, 52 (01) : 400 - 403
  • [25] An improved reconstruction method for polarimetric neutron tomography
    Cao, Chao
    Wang, Sheng
    Yin, Wei
    Huo, Heyong
    Wu, Yang
    Li, Hang
    Tang, Bin
    PHYSICA B-CONDENSED MATTER, 2021, 603
  • [26] Comparison of two- and three-dimensional reconstruction methods in optical tomography
    Schweiger, M
    Arridge, SR
    APPLIED OPTICS, 1998, 37 (31): : 7419 - 7428
  • [27] Iterative reconstruction algorithms in neutron tomography imaging
    Salama, Gerges M.
    Hamed, Hesham F. A.
    Abd El-Samie, Fathi E.
    Mahmoud, Imbaby I.
    Abd el Bar, Waleed
    Zaky, Magdy M.
    JOURNAL OF OPTICS-INDIA, 2024,
  • [28] Direct Reconstruction Methods in Optical Tomography
    Schotland, John C.
    MATHEMATICAL MODELING IN BIOMEDICAL IMAGING II: OPTICAL, ULTRASOUND, AND OPTO-ACOUSTIC TOMOGRAPHIES, 2012, 2035 : 1 - 29
  • [29] ANALOG RECONSTRUCTION METHODS FOR TRANSAXIAL TOMOGRAPHY
    BARRETT, HH
    SWINDELL, W
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE, 1977, 65 (01) : 89 - 107
  • [30] Fluorescence tomography: Reconstruction by iterative methods
    Miqueles, Eduardo X.
    De Pierro, Alvaro R.
    2008 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON BIOMEDICAL IMAGING: FROM NANO TO MACRO, VOLS 1-4, 2008, : 760 - 763