A comparison of 2D and 3D numerical simulations of tunnelling in soft soils

被引:20
|
作者
Ngoc Anh Do [1 ]
Dias, Daniel [2 ]
机构
[1] Hanoi Univ Min & Geol, Dept Underground & Min Construct, Fac Civil Engn, Hanoi, Vietnam
[2] Grenoble Alpes Univ, Lab 3SR, Grenoble, France
关键词
Tunnelling; Soft soil; Numerical calculations;
D O I
10.1007/s12665-017-6425-z
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Tunnel excavation is a three-dimensional problem, especially in the zone close to the tunnel face. However, despite recent advances in computing resources, a full 3D numerical analysis is usually complex and requires important computational resources (both in terms of storage and of time). Two-dimensional simulations are therefore often used. In this paper, the Hanoi metro system is used as a case study. A numerical investigation is performed to evaluate the applicability of 2D deconfinement methods. These methods consider pre-displacements of the soil surrounding the tunnel before installation of the tunnel structure to model the 3D phenomenon which occurs at the tunnel face. The obtained results allow estimating the 2D deconfinement method which gives the better agreement with the 3D model in terms of both soil movements and structural forces induced in the tunnel lining using an error function. These estimations were performed at different sections along the tunnel direction in order to highlight the effect of the tunnel advancement on the applicability of 2D deconfinement methods.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] 2D or 3D?
    Mills, R
    [J]. COMPUTER-AIDED ENGINEERING, 1996, 15 (08): : 4 - 4
  • [42] 3D Computed Tomography vs. 2D radiography: comparison of 3D direct anthropometry with 2D norm calculations and analysis of differences in soft tissue measurements
    Perrotti, G.
    Goker, F.
    Rossi, O.
    Nowakowska, J.
    Russillo, A.
    Beltramini, G.
    Tartaglia, G. M.
    Testori, T.
    Del Fabbro, M.
    Mortellaro, C.
    [J]. EUROPEAN REVIEW FOR MEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2023, 27 : 46 - 60
  • [43] Comparison between 2D and 3D codes in dynamical simulations of gas flow in barred galaxies
    Perez, I.
    [J]. ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2008, 478 (03): : 717 - 721
  • [44] Comparison of 2D and 3D images of fractures in a Vertisol
    Moreau, E
    Velde, B
    Terribile, F
    [J]. GEODERMA, 1999, 92 (1-2) : 55 - 72
  • [45] Comparison between 3D and 2D Cephalometric Analyses
    Bholsithi, W.
    Sinthanayothin, C.
    Chintakanon, K.
    Komolpis, R.
    Tharanon, W.
    [J]. 4TH KUALA LUMPUR INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING 2008, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2008, 21 (1-2): : 540 - +
  • [46] Comparison of random surfaces 2D and 3D parameters
    Pawlus, P.
    Reizer, R.
    [J]. Annals of DAAAM for 2006 & Proceedings of the 17th International DAAAM Symposium: INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING & AUTOMATION: FOCUS ON MECHATRONICS AND ROBOTICS, 2006, : 293 - 294
  • [47] Comparison of 3D and 2D menus for cell phones
    Kim, Kyungdoh
    Proctor, Robert W.
    Salvendy, Gavriel
    [J]. COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2011, 27 (05) : 2056 - 2066
  • [48] COMPARISON OF SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY OF 2D AND 3D ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY
    BELOHLAVEK, M
    FOLEY, DA
    GREENLEAF, JF
    SEWARD, JB
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 1993, 88 (04) : 350 - 350
  • [49] Comparison of 2D and 3D FEA of a BLDC motor
    Wang, S
    Kang, J
    Park, K
    Yoon, H
    Jang, G
    [J]. COMPEL-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR COMPUTATION AND MATHEMATICS IN ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC ENGINEERING, 2000, 19 (02) : 529 - 537
  • [50] Registration Using Nanotube Stationary Tomosynthesis: Comparison of 3D/3D to 3D/2D Methods
    Frederick, B.
    Lalush, D.
    Chang, S.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (06)