A comparison of 2D and 3D numerical simulations of tunnelling in soft soils

被引:20
|
作者
Ngoc Anh Do [1 ]
Dias, Daniel [2 ]
机构
[1] Hanoi Univ Min & Geol, Dept Underground & Min Construct, Fac Civil Engn, Hanoi, Vietnam
[2] Grenoble Alpes Univ, Lab 3SR, Grenoble, France
关键词
Tunnelling; Soft soil; Numerical calculations;
D O I
10.1007/s12665-017-6425-z
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Tunnel excavation is a three-dimensional problem, especially in the zone close to the tunnel face. However, despite recent advances in computing resources, a full 3D numerical analysis is usually complex and requires important computational resources (both in terms of storage and of time). Two-dimensional simulations are therefore often used. In this paper, the Hanoi metro system is used as a case study. A numerical investigation is performed to evaluate the applicability of 2D deconfinement methods. These methods consider pre-displacements of the soil surrounding the tunnel before installation of the tunnel structure to model the 3D phenomenon which occurs at the tunnel face. The obtained results allow estimating the 2D deconfinement method which gives the better agreement with the 3D model in terms of both soil movements and structural forces induced in the tunnel lining using an error function. These estimations were performed at different sections along the tunnel direction in order to highlight the effect of the tunnel advancement on the applicability of 2D deconfinement methods.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] 2D and 3D numerical simulations of a reinforced landslide: A case study in NE Turkey
    Ersoy, Hakan
    Kaya, Ayberk
    Angin, Zekai
    Dag, Serhat
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCE, 2020, 129 (01)
  • [22] Equivalence between 2D and 3D numerical simulations of the seismic response of improved sites
    Papadimitriou, A. G.
    Bouckovalas, G. D.
    Vytiniotis, A. C.
    Bakas, G. J.
    [J]. Numerical Methods in Geotechnical Engineering, 2006, : 809 - 815
  • [23] 2D and 3D numerical simulations of a reinforced landslide: A case study in NE Turkey
    Hakan Ersoy
    Ayberk Kaya
    Zekaİ Angın
    Serhat DaĞ
    [J]. Journal of Earth System Science, 2020, 129
  • [24] 3D numerical modelling of the impact of tunnelling in soft soil on buried pipelines
    Emeriault, Fabrice
    Meng, Ke
    [J]. GEOTECHNICAL ASPECTS OF UNDERGROUND CONSTRUCTION IN SOFT GROUND, 2014, : 179 - 183
  • [25] Comparison between 2D and 3D numerical modeling of superplastic forming processes
    Hambli, R
    Potiron, A
    [J]. COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2001, 190 (37-38) : 4871 - 4880
  • [26] Soft tubular microfluidics for 2D and 3D applications
    Xi, Wang
    Kong, Fang
    Yeo, Joo Chuan
    Yu, Longteng
    Sonam, Surabhi
    Dao, Ming
    Gong, Xiaobo
    Lim, Chwee Teck
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2017, 114 (40) : 10590 - 10595
  • [27] Single- and two-phase numerical models of Dissolved Air Flotation: Comparison of 2D and 3D simulations
    Bondelind, Mia
    Sasic, Srdjan
    Kostoglou, Margaritis
    Bergdahl, Lars
    Pettersson, Thomas J. R.
    [J]. COLLOIDS AND SURFACES A-PHYSICOCHEMICAL AND ENGINEERING ASPECTS, 2010, 365 (1-3) : 137 - 144
  • [28] Numerical VIV analysis of a single elastically-mounted cylinder: Comparison between 2D and 3D URANS simulations
    Martini, Simone
    Morgut, Mitja
    Pigazzini, Riccardo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FLUIDS AND STRUCTURES, 2021, 104
  • [29] Comparison of 2D and 3D gamma analyses
    Pulliam, Kiley B.
    Huang, Jessie Y.
    Howell, Rebecca M.
    Followill, David
    Bosca, Ryan
    O'Daniel, Jennifer
    Kry, Stephen F.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (02) : 021710
  • [30] Simulations of the ripening of 3D, 2D and 1D objects
    Bonafos, C
    Colombeau, B
    Carrada, M
    Altibelli, A
    Claverie, A
    [J]. MATERIALS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING B-SOLID STATE MATERIALS FOR ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 88 (2-3): : 112 - 117