Is online newspaper advertising cannibalizing print advertising?

被引:28
|
作者
Sridhar, Shrihari [1 ]
Sriram, S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Smeal Coll Business, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Ross Sch Business, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
来源
关键词
Advertising; Newspapers; Cannibalization; Offline vs. online advertising; Econometric models; SUBSTITUTABILITY; MEDIA; DEMAND; SALES;
D O I
10.1007/s11129-015-9160-3
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
During the past decade, the newspaper industry experienced significant erosion of revenues, predominantly in print advertising. The concomitant increase in the less rewarding online advertising has been unable to make up for this loss. As a result, for every $ 1 increase in online advertising between 2005 and 2011, newspapers lost $ 22 in print advertising. While it is conceivable that the overall change in the advertising landscape (such as the growth of targeted search advertising), contributed to the decline in print advertising, it is not clear whether the growth in online newspaper advertising aggravated or alleviated this global trend. We investigate this concern by studying how advertisers reallocate their media budgets over time between the online and print media within a newspaper. We perform our empirical analysis using unique panel data on account-level advertising expenditures in a Top 50 US newspaper from 2005 through 2011. After accounting for cross-sectional heterogeneity among advertisers and some factors that possibly drove both print and online newspaper advertising, we find a negative relationship between the ad spending in these two media options. Therefore, advertisers exhibit a higher propensity to decrease print spending when they increase their online spending compared to the scenario when online spending either remains unchanged or even decreases. Since we do not rely on exclusion restrictions, we cannot rule out residual factors that drove both print and online advertising and thus contaminated this relationship. However, such potentially confounding factors (e.g., change in total media budget) are likely to have induced a positive correlation between print and online advertising. Therefore, the negative relationship that we recover is suggestive of advertisers perceiving print and online newspaper advertising as substitutes. This, in turn, implies that the growth in online newspaper advertising exacerbated the overall decline in print advertising. Overall, we attribute 7-17 % of the decline in print newspaper advertising revenues between 2005 and 2011 to the growth of online newspaper advertising. We conclude that cannibalization should be a credible consideration in the marketing decisions of the newspaper. However, since a large portion of print advertising revenue decline also occured for advertisers who never purchased online advertising from the newspaper, cannibalization within the newspaper is not solely responsible for the downward trajectory of print advertising.
引用
收藏
页码:283 / 318
页数:36
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Some Observations on Online Advertising: A New Advertising System
    Liu, Dapeng
    Xu, Shaochun
    Chen, Lichao
    Wang, Chunning
    [J]. 2015 IEEE/ACIS 14TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER AND INFORMATION SCIENCE (ICIS), 2015, : 387 - 392
  • [42] Online advertising and privacy
    de Corniere, Alexandre
    de Nijs, Romain
    [J]. RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2016, 47 (01): : 48 - 72
  • [43] The effects of online advertising
    McCoy, Scott
    Everard, Andrea
    Polak, Peter
    Galletta, Dennis F.
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 2007, 50 (03) : 84 - 88
  • [44] Online Advertising Fraud
    Kshetri, Nir
    Voas, Jeffrey
    [J]. COMPUTER, 2019, 52 (01) : 58 - 61
  • [45] BEYOND ONLINE ADVERTISING
    Lako, Cristian
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE EUROPEAN INTEGRATION: BETWEEN TRADITION AND MODERNITY, VOL 2, 2007, : 357 - 363
  • [46] Learning in Online Advertising
    Choi, W. Jason
    Sayedi, Amin
    [J]. MARKETING SCIENCE, 2019, 38 (04) : 584 - 608
  • [47] Representation of Orientalism in Sunsilk Print Advertising
    Nurcahya, Hilma Rizky
    Hafiar, Hanny
    Nugraha, Aat Ruchiat
    [J]. JURNAL THE MESSENGER, 2018, 10 (02) : 150 - 161
  • [48] A Peircean inspired typology of print advertising
    Andersen, Christian
    Sorensen, Bent
    [J]. SEMIOTICA, 2010, 182 (1-4) : 15 - 35
  • [49] Consumer responses to tropes in print advertising
    Toncar, M
    Munch, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVERTISING, 2001, 30 (01) : 55 - 65
  • [50] ADVERTISING COMMUNICATION - PRINT VS TV
    GRASS, RC
    WALLACE, WH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVERTISING RESEARCH, 1974, 14 (05) : 19 - 23