Cost-analysis of robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for women with endometrial cancer and atypical complex hyperplasia

被引:33
|
作者
Herling, Suzanne F. [1 ]
Palle, Connie [2 ]
Moller, Ann M. [1 ]
Thomsen, Thordis [3 ]
Sorensen, Jan [4 ]
机构
[1] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Res Unit, Herlev, Denmark
[2] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Dept Gynecol, Herlev, Denmark
[3] Rigshosp, Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Abdominal Ctr, Copenhagen, Denmark
[4] Univ Southern Denmark, Dept Publ Hlth, Ctr Hlth Econ Res COHERE, Odense, Denmark
关键词
Robotics; hysterectomy; costs and cost analysis; postoperative complications; endometrial neoplasms; economics; medical; HEALTH ECONOMIC-EVALUATION; SURGERY; LAPAROTOMY; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1111/aogs.12820
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
IntroductionThe aim of this study was to analyse the hospital cost of treatment with robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy and total abdominal hysterectomy for women with endometrial cancer or atypical complex hyperplasia and to identify differences in resource use and cost. Material and methodsThis cost analysis was based on two cohorts: women treated with robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy (n=202) or with total abdominal hysterectomy (n=158) at Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark. We conducted an activity-based cost analysis including consumables and healthcare professionals' salaries. As cost-drivers we included severe complications, duration of surgery, anesthesia and stay at the post-anesthetic care unit, as well as number of hospital bed-days. Ordinary least-squares regression was used to explore the cost variation. The primary outcome was cost difference in Danish kroner between total abdominal hysterectomy and robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy. ResultsThe average cost of consumables was 12642 Danish kroner more expensive per patient for robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy than for total abdominal hysterectomy (2014 price level: 1Euro=7.50 Danish kroner). When including all cost-drivers, the analysis showed that the robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy procedure was 9386 Danish kroner (17%) cheaper than the total abdominal hysterectomy (p=0.003). When the robot investment was included, the cost difference reduced to 4053 Danish kroner (robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy was 7% cheaper than total abdominal hysterectomy) (p=0.20). Increasing age and Type 2 diabetes appeared to influence the overall costs. ConclusionFor women with endometrial cancer or atypical complex hyperplasia, robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy was cheaper than total abdominal hysterectomy, mostly due to fewer complications and shorter length of hospital stay.
引用
收藏
页码:299 / 308
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer: Analysis of surgical performance
    Holloway, Robert W.
    Ahmad, Sarfraz
    DeNardis, Sara A.
    Peterson, Lorna B.
    Sultana, Nazia
    Bigsby, Glenn E.
    Pikaart, Dirk P.
    Finkler, Neil J.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2009, 115 (03) : 447 - 452
  • [22] Cost-effectiveness of robotic hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy in early endometrial cancer
    Lundin, Evelyn Serreyn
    Carlsson, Per
    Wodlin, Ninnie Borendal
    Nilsson, Lena
    Kjolhede, Preben
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2020, 30 (11) : 1719 - 1725
  • [23] TOTAL LAPAROSCOPIC HYSTERECTOMY VERSUS LAPAROSCOPIC-ASSISTED VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF ENDOMETRIAL CANCER
    Urbute, A.
    Bartuseviciene, E.
    Gedgaudaite, M.
    Bartusevicius, A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2017, 27 : 1040 - 1040
  • [24] Robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy seems safe in women with early-stage endometrial cancer
    Herling, Suzanne Forsyth
    Havemann, Maria Cecilie
    Palle, Connie
    Moller, Ann Merete
    Thomsen, Thordis
    DANISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 62 (08):
  • [25] Classification of Postoperative Complications in Robotic-assisted Compared With Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer
    Barrie, Allison
    Freeman, Alexandra H.
    Lyon, Liisa
    Garcia, Christine
    Conell, Carol
    Abbott, Laura H.
    Littell, Ramey D.
    Powell, C. Bethan
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 23 (07) : 1181 - 1188
  • [26] Robotic versus laparoscopic hysterectomy in morbidly obese women for endometrial cancer
    Vanessa El-Achi
    Jennifer Weishaupt
    Jonathan Carter
    Sam Saidi
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2021, 15 : 483 - 487
  • [27] Robotic versus laparoscopic hysterectomy in morbidly obese women for endometrial cancer
    El-Achi, Vanessa
    Weishaupt, Jennifer
    Carter, Jonathan
    Saidi, Sam
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2021, 15 (03) : 483 - 487
  • [28] Robotic versus Laparoscopic Hysterectomy in Morbidly Obese Women for Endometrial Cancer
    El-Achi, V.
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2021, 61 : 56 - 57
  • [29] Postoperative Pain Scores and Narcotic Use in Robotic-assisted Versus Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer Staging
    Turner, Taylor B.
    Habib, Ashraf S.
    Broadwater, Gloria
    Valea, Fidel A.
    Fleming, Nicole D.
    Ehrisman, Jessie A.
    Di Santo, Nicola
    Havrilesky, Laura J.
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 22 (06) : 1004 - 1010
  • [30] Robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy for the treatment of uterine cancer
    Giles, D. L.
    Magrina, J. F.
    Magtibay, P. M.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2007, 107 (02) : 369 - 370