Classification of Postoperative Complications in Robotic-assisted Compared With Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer

被引:20
|
作者
Barrie, Allison [1 ]
Freeman, Alexandra H. [1 ]
Lyon, Liisa [2 ]
Garcia, Christine [3 ]
Conell, Carol [2 ]
Abbott, Laura H. [1 ]
Littell, Ramey D. [4 ]
Powell, C. Bethan [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Kaiser Permanente San Francisco Obstet & Gynecol, San Francisco, CA USA
[2] Kaiser Permanente Northern Calif, Div Res, Oakland, CA USA
[3] Univ Virginia, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Gynecol Oncol, Charlottesville, VA USA
[4] Kaiser Permanente Northern Calif Gynecol Canc Pro, San Francisco, CA USA
关键词
Endometrial cancer; Minimally invasive hysterectomy; Robotic surgery; Surgical complications; OUTCOMES; LAPAROTOMY; COST;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmig.2016.08.832
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Study Objective: To compare intraoperative and postoperative surgical complications and outcomes between robotic assisted and laparoscopic surgical management of endometrial cancer using a standardized classification system. Design: A retrospective cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). Setting: An integrated health care system in Northern California. Patients: One thousand four hundred thirty-three women with a diagnosis of complex atypical hyperplasia and endometrial cancer managed by minimally invasive hysterectomy and surgical staging from January 2009 to January 2014. Interventions: Seven hundred forty-five robotic-assisted and 688 laparoscopic hysterectomies were evaluated. Measurements and Main Results: The primary outcome was intraoperative and postoperative complications within 30 days. All complications were categorized using the Clavien-Dindo classification system. Secondary outcomes included total operative time, estimated blood loss, transfusion rates, length of stay, conversion to laparotomy, and number of pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes retrieved. The modality of hysterectomy was not associated with either overall intraoperative complications or major postoperative complications (p>.1). However, there were significantly fewer minor postoperative complications with robotic surgery (16.6% vs 25.6%, p<.01). Statistically significant differences were also noted in the following outcomes: decreased median operative time, length of stay, estimated blood loss, conversion to laparotomy, and median number of lymph nodes retrieved in the robotic group when compared with the laparoscopic group. Conclusion: There was no difference in the rate of major complication between robotic and laparoscopic surgery using the Clavien-Dindo system of categorizing surgical complications; however, there were clinically significant differences favoring the robotic approach, including a lower rate of minor complications and conversion rate to laparotomy. (C) 2016 AAGL. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1181 / 1188
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy for women with endometrial cancer
    Herling, Suzanne Forsyth
    Moller, Ann M.
    Palle, Connie
    Grynnerup, Anja
    Thomsen, Thordis
    DANISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 64 (03):
  • [2] Robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer
    Johansson, Cherynne Yuin Mun
    Chan, Felix Kwok Hee
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY-X, 2020, 8
  • [3] Robotic-Assisted Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer Compared With Traditional Laparoscopic and Laparotomy Approaches A Systematic Review
    Gaia, Giorgia
    Holloway, Robert W.
    Santoro, Luigi
    Ahmad, Sarfraz
    Di Silverio, Elena
    Spinillo, Arsenio
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 116 (06): : 1422 - 1431
  • [4] Postoperative Pain Scores and Narcotic Use in Robotic-assisted Versus Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer Staging
    Turner, Taylor B.
    Habib, Ashraf S.
    Broadwater, Gloria
    Valea, Fidel A.
    Fleming, Nicole D.
    Ehrisman, Jessie A.
    Di Santo, Nicola
    Havrilesky, Laura J.
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 22 (06) : 1004 - 1010
  • [5] Robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer: Analysis of surgical performance
    Holloway, Robert W.
    Ahmad, Sarfraz
    DeNardis, Sara A.
    Peterson, Lorna B.
    Sultana, Nazia
    Bigsby, Glenn E.
    Pikaart, Dirk P.
    Finkler, Neil J.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2009, 115 (03) : 447 - 452
  • [6] Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Hysterectomy versus Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer at a Regional Institution: A Retrospective Study
    Hiratsuka, Daiki
    Tsuchiya, Akira
    Isono, Wataru
    Honda, Michiko
    Tsuchiya, Hiroko
    Matsuyama, Reiko
    Fujimoto, Akihisa
    Nishii, Osamu
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 50 (03):
  • [7] Robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and vaginal hysterectomy in morbidly obese patients with endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial cancer
    Giannini, Andrea
    D'Oria, Ottavia
    Vizza, Enrico
    Congiu, Mario A.
    Cuccu, Ilaria
    D'Auge, Tullio Golia
    Saponara, Stefania
    Capalbo, Giuseppe
    Di Donato, Violante
    Raspagliesi, Francesco
    Bogani, Giorgio
    MINIMALLY INVASIVE THERAPY & ALLIED TECHNOLOGIES, 2024, 33 (06) : 358 - 364
  • [8] Learning curve in concurrent application of laparoscopic and robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer
    Torng, Pao-Ling
    Pan, Song-Po
    Hwang, Jing-Shiang
    Shih, Ho-Jun
    Chen, Chi-Ling
    TAIWANESE JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 56 (06): : 781 - 787
  • [9] Prehabilitation to enhance postoperative recovery for an octogenarian following robotic-assisted hysterectomy with endometrial cancer
    Carli, Franco
    Brown, Russell
    Kennepohl, Stephan
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 2012, 59 (08): : 779 - 784
  • [10] Robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy for the treatment of uterine cancer
    Giles, D. L.
    Magrina, J. F.
    Magtibay, P. M.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2007, 107 (02) : 369 - 370