Classification of Postoperative Complications in Robotic-assisted Compared With Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer

被引:20
|
作者
Barrie, Allison [1 ]
Freeman, Alexandra H. [1 ]
Lyon, Liisa [2 ]
Garcia, Christine [3 ]
Conell, Carol [2 ]
Abbott, Laura H. [1 ]
Littell, Ramey D. [4 ]
Powell, C. Bethan [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Kaiser Permanente San Francisco Obstet & Gynecol, San Francisco, CA USA
[2] Kaiser Permanente Northern Calif, Div Res, Oakland, CA USA
[3] Univ Virginia, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Gynecol Oncol, Charlottesville, VA USA
[4] Kaiser Permanente Northern Calif Gynecol Canc Pro, San Francisco, CA USA
关键词
Endometrial cancer; Minimally invasive hysterectomy; Robotic surgery; Surgical complications; OUTCOMES; LAPAROTOMY; COST;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmig.2016.08.832
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Study Objective: To compare intraoperative and postoperative surgical complications and outcomes between robotic assisted and laparoscopic surgical management of endometrial cancer using a standardized classification system. Design: A retrospective cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). Setting: An integrated health care system in Northern California. Patients: One thousand four hundred thirty-three women with a diagnosis of complex atypical hyperplasia and endometrial cancer managed by minimally invasive hysterectomy and surgical staging from January 2009 to January 2014. Interventions: Seven hundred forty-five robotic-assisted and 688 laparoscopic hysterectomies were evaluated. Measurements and Main Results: The primary outcome was intraoperative and postoperative complications within 30 days. All complications were categorized using the Clavien-Dindo classification system. Secondary outcomes included total operative time, estimated blood loss, transfusion rates, length of stay, conversion to laparotomy, and number of pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes retrieved. The modality of hysterectomy was not associated with either overall intraoperative complications or major postoperative complications (p>.1). However, there were significantly fewer minor postoperative complications with robotic surgery (16.6% vs 25.6%, p<.01). Statistically significant differences were also noted in the following outcomes: decreased median operative time, length of stay, estimated blood loss, conversion to laparotomy, and median number of lymph nodes retrieved in the robotic group when compared with the laparoscopic group. Conclusion: There was no difference in the rate of major complication between robotic and laparoscopic surgery using the Clavien-Dindo system of categorizing surgical complications; however, there were clinically significant differences favoring the robotic approach, including a lower rate of minor complications and conversion rate to laparotomy. (C) 2016 AAGL. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1181 / 1188
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Robotic-Assisted Bariatric Surgery Is Associated with Increased Postoperative Complications Compared to Laparoscopic: a Nationwide Readmissions Database Study
    Klock, Julie A.
    Bremer, Kristin
    Niu, Fang
    Walters, Ryan W.
    Nandipati, Kalyana C.
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2023, 33 (07) : 2186 - 2193
  • [32] Robotic-Assisted Bariatric Surgery Is Associated with Increased Postoperative Complications Compared to Laparoscopic: a Nationwide Readmissions Database Study
    Julie A. Klock
    Kristin Bremer
    Fang Niu
    Ryan W. Walters
    Kalyana C. Nandipati
    Obesity Surgery, 2023, 33 : 2186 - 2193
  • [33] POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS AND SURGEON EXPERIENCE FOLLOWING ROBOTIC-ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Graves, Nora
    Sennett, Julia B.
    Miller, Kevin
    Harmon, Justin D.
    Jaffe, Jamison S.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2012, 26 : A132 - A132
  • [34] Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Optimizing Use of This Technology
    Paraiso, Marie Fidela R.
    Brown, Jubilee
    Michener, Chad
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 122 (02): : 435 - 436
  • [35] Prolonged intubation after robotic-assisted hysterectomy for endometrial cancer: Case reports
    Ciccone, Marcia A.
    Hom, Marianne S.
    Morocco, Elise B.
    Muderspach, Laila, I
    Matsuo, Koji
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY REPORTS, 2018, 25 : 106 - 108
  • [36] Strategies to optimize the performance of Robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy
    Lambrou, N.
    Diaz, R. E.
    Hinoul, P.
    Parris, D.
    Shoemaker, K.
    Yoo, A.
    Schwiers, M.
    FACTS VIEWS AND VISION IN OBGYN, 2014, 6 (03): : 133 - 142
  • [37] Surgical outcomes of conventional laparoscopic and robotic-assisted hysterectomy
    Gitas, Georgios
    Alkatout, Ibrahim
    Proppe, Louisa
    Werner, Nele
    Rody, Achim
    Hanker, Lars
    Pados, George
    Freytag, Damaris
    Sommer, Soteris
    Baum, Sascha
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2021, 17 (03):
  • [38] Cost-analysis of robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for women with endometrial cancer and atypical complex hyperplasia
    Herling, Suzanne F.
    Palle, Connie
    Moller, Ann M.
    Thomsen, Thordis
    Sorensen, Jan
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2016, 95 (03) : 299 - 308
  • [39] Robotic Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer in Obese Patients With Comorbidities Evaluating Postoperative Complications
    Backes, Floor J.
    Rosen, Maggie
    Liang, Margaret
    McCann, Georgia A.
    Clements, Aine
    Cohn, David E.
    O'Malley, David M.
    Salani, Ritu
    Fowler, Jeffrey M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2015, 25 (07) : 1271 - 1276
  • [40] Management of the complications of robotic-assisted laparoscopic cystectomy
    Challacombe, B.
    Elhage, O.
    Murphy, D.
    Rimington, P.
    Khan, S.
    Dasgupta, P.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 103 : 5 - 5