Cost-analysis of robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for women with endometrial cancer and atypical complex hyperplasia

被引:33
|
作者
Herling, Suzanne F. [1 ]
Palle, Connie [2 ]
Moller, Ann M. [1 ]
Thomsen, Thordis [3 ]
Sorensen, Jan [4 ]
机构
[1] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Res Unit, Herlev, Denmark
[2] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Dept Gynecol, Herlev, Denmark
[3] Rigshosp, Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Abdominal Ctr, Copenhagen, Denmark
[4] Univ Southern Denmark, Dept Publ Hlth, Ctr Hlth Econ Res COHERE, Odense, Denmark
关键词
Robotics; hysterectomy; costs and cost analysis; postoperative complications; endometrial neoplasms; economics; medical; HEALTH ECONOMIC-EVALUATION; SURGERY; LAPAROTOMY; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1111/aogs.12820
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
IntroductionThe aim of this study was to analyse the hospital cost of treatment with robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy and total abdominal hysterectomy for women with endometrial cancer or atypical complex hyperplasia and to identify differences in resource use and cost. Material and methodsThis cost analysis was based on two cohorts: women treated with robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy (n=202) or with total abdominal hysterectomy (n=158) at Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark. We conducted an activity-based cost analysis including consumables and healthcare professionals' salaries. As cost-drivers we included severe complications, duration of surgery, anesthesia and stay at the post-anesthetic care unit, as well as number of hospital bed-days. Ordinary least-squares regression was used to explore the cost variation. The primary outcome was cost difference in Danish kroner between total abdominal hysterectomy and robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy. ResultsThe average cost of consumables was 12642 Danish kroner more expensive per patient for robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy than for total abdominal hysterectomy (2014 price level: 1Euro=7.50 Danish kroner). When including all cost-drivers, the analysis showed that the robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy procedure was 9386 Danish kroner (17%) cheaper than the total abdominal hysterectomy (p=0.003). When the robot investment was included, the cost difference reduced to 4053 Danish kroner (robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy was 7% cheaper than total abdominal hysterectomy) (p=0.20). Increasing age and Type 2 diabetes appeared to influence the overall costs. ConclusionFor women with endometrial cancer or atypical complex hyperplasia, robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy was cheaper than total abdominal hysterectomy, mostly due to fewer complications and shorter length of hospital stay.
引用
收藏
页码:299 / 308
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy versus Laparoscopic-Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy in Endometrial Cancer: Surgical and Survival Outcomes
    Fader, A. Nickles
    Michener, C. M.
    Frasure, H. E.
    Giannios, N.
    Belinson, J. L.
    Zanotti, K. M.
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 16 (03) : 333 - 339
  • [32] Laparoscopic versus abdominal hysterectomy in the treatment of endometrial cancer
    Fram, Kamil M.
    Sumrein, Issa M.
    SAUDI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 34 (01) : 11 - 18
  • [33] Learning curve in concurrent application of laparoscopic and robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer
    Torng, Pao-Ling
    Pan, Song-Po
    Hwang, Jing-Shiang
    Shih, Ho-Jun
    Chen, Chi-Ling
    TAIWANESE JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 56 (06): : 781 - 787
  • [34] The cost-effectiveness of total laparoscopic hysterectomy compared to total abdominal hysterectomy for the treatment of early stage endometrial cancer
    Graves, Nicholas
    Janda, Monika
    Merollini, Katharina
    Gebski, Val
    Obermair, Andreas
    BMJ OPEN, 2013, 3 (04):
  • [35] The cost-effectiveness of total laparoscopic hysterectomy compared to total abdominal hysterectomy for the treatment of early stage endometrial cancer
    Chandock, A. S.
    Singh, K.
    Balega, J.
    Fisher, M.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2014, 121 : 184 - 184
  • [36] A comparison of robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy and staging with other techniques currently used for the treatment of endometrial cancer
    Lambrou, N.
    Diaz, R.
    Estape, R.
    Estape, E.
    Vega, O.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2010, 116 (03) : S23 - S24
  • [37] Risk of endometrial cancer in patients with a preoperative diagnosis of atypical endometrial hyperplasia treated with total laparoscopic hysterectomy
    Oda, Katsutoshi
    Koga, Kaori
    Hirata, Tetsuya
    Maruyama, Masanori
    Ikemura, Masako
    Matsumoto, Yoko
    Nagasaka, Kazunori
    Adachi, Katsuyuki
    Mori-Uchino, Mayuyo
    Sone, Kenbun
    Arimoto, Takahide
    Wada-Hiraike, Osamu
    Kawana, Kei
    Fukayama, Masashi
    Fujii, Tomoyuki
    Osuga, Yutaka
    GYNECOLOGY AND MINIMALLY INVASIVE THERAPY-GMIT, 2016, 5 (02): : 69 - 73
  • [38] A cost analysis of endometrial ablation, abdominal hysterectomy, vaginal hysterectomy, and laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy in the treatment of primary menorrhagia
    Ransom, SB
    McNeeley, SG
    White, C
    Diamond, MP
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF GYNECOLOGIC LAPAROSCOPISTS, 1996, 4 (01): : 29 - 32
  • [39] A Multiinstitutional Experience With Robotic-Assisted Hysterectomy With Staging for Endometrial Cancer
    Lowe, M. Patrick
    Johnson, Peter R.
    Kamelle, Scott A.
    Kumar, Saurabh
    Chamberlain, Donald H.
    Tillmanns, Todd D.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 114 (02): : 236 - 243
  • [40] The Experience of Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Women Treated for Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer A Qualitative Study
    Herling, Suzanne Forsyth
    Palle, Connie
    Moeller, Ann M.
    Thomsen, Thordis
    CANCER NURSING, 2016, 39 (02) : 125 - 133