Activation sequence modification during cardiac resynchronization by manipulation of left ventricular epicardial pacing stimulus strength

被引:0
|
作者
Tedrow, Usha B.
Stevenson, William G.
Wood, Mark A.
Shepard, Richard K.
Hall, Kim
Pellegrini, Christine P.
Ellenbogen, Kenneth A.
机构
[1] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Cardiovasc, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Med Coll Virginia, Div Cardiovasc, Richmond, VA 23298 USA
来源
关键词
pacing; congestive heart failure;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Success of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) depends on altering electrical ventricular activation (VA) to achieve mechanical benefit. That increases in stimulus strength (SS) can affect VA has been demonstrated previously in cardiomyopathy patients undergoing ablation. Objective: To determine whether increasing SS can alter VA during CRT. Methods: In 71 patients with CRT devices, left ventricle (LV) pacing was performed at escalating SS. Timing from pacing stimulus to right ventricular (RV) electrogram, ECG morphology, and maximal QRS duration on 12 lead ECG were recorded. Results: Demographics: Baseline QRS duration 153 +/- 25 ms, ischemic cardiomyopathy 48%, ejection fraction 24% +/- 7%. With increased SS, conduction time from LV to right ventricle (RV) decreased from 125 +/- 56 ms to 111 +/- 59 ms (P = 0.006). QRS duration decreased from 212 +/- 46 ms to 194 +/- 42 ms (P = 0.0002). A marked change in QRS morphology occurred in 11/71 patients (15%). The RV ring was the anode in 6, while the RV coil was the anode in 5. Sites with change in QRS morphology showed decrease in conduction time from LV to RV from 110 +/- 60 ms to 64 +/- 68 ms (P = 0.04). Twelve patients (16%) had diaphragmatic stimulation with increased SS. Conclusions: Increasing LV SS reduces QRS duration and conduction time from LV to RV. Recognition of significant QRS morphology change is likely clinically important during LV threshold programming to avoid unintended VA change.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 69
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Variable regions of maximal electrical delay during intrinsic left ventricular activation versus right ventricular pacing in candidates for cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Rad, M. Mafi
    Vernooy, K.
    Prinzen, F. W.
    Crijns, H. J.
    Blaauw, Y.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2013, 34 : 588 - 588
  • [42] Feasibility of left ventricular endocardial lead pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Algazzar, Alaa Solaiman
    Taha, Mohamed Osama
    Katta, Azza Ali
    El Abbady, Asmaa
    Lotfy, Heba Abdelmoteleb
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2018, 6 (02): : 53 - 55
  • [43] Identification of the optimal left ventricular pacing site in biventricular cardiac resynchronization
    Helm, RH
    Daya, SK
    Chen, J
    Tunin, R
    Zviman, MM
    Nazarian, S
    Halperin, H
    Berger, R
    Kass, DA
    Lardo, AC
    CIRCULATION, 2004, 110 (17) : 429 - 429
  • [44] Should the Left Ventricular Pacing Lead Be Positioned at the Site of Latest Mechanical Activation in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy?
    Van Bommel, Rutger J.
    Schalij, Martin J.
    Bax, Jeroen J.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2009, 20 (05) : 536 - 538
  • [45] Left Bundle Branch Pacing vs Left Ventricular Septal Pacing vs Biventricular Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
    Diaz, Juan C.
    Tedrow, Usha B.
    Duque, Mauricio
    Aristizabal, Julian
    Braunstein, Eric D.
    Marin, Jorge
    Nino, Cesar
    Bastidas, Oriana
    Cabanillas, Nestor Lopez
    Koplan, Bruce A.
    Hoyos, Carolina
    Matos, Carlos D.
    Hincapie, Daniela
    Velasco, Alejandro
    Steiger, Nathaniel A.
    Kapur, Sunil
    Tadros, Thomas M.
    Zei, Paul C.
    Sauer, William H.
    Romero, Jorge E.
    JACC-CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2024, 10 (02) : 295 - 305
  • [46] Impact of left ventricular pacing threshold on ventricular arrhythmia occurrence in cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Ferri-Certic, Jerko
    Zavrl-Dzananovic, Dinko
    Lezaic, Luka
    Zizek, David
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 74 (3-4) : 353 - 359
  • [47] Stimulus Intensity in Left Ventricular Leads and Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
    Bavikati, Venkata V.
    Langberg, Jonathan J.
    Williams, B. Robinson, III
    Kella, Danesh
    Lloyd, Michael S.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2012, 1 (05):
  • [48] Biventricular Pacing With Ventricular Fusion by Intrinsic Activation in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
    Guo, Tao
    Li, Ruijie
    Zhang, Limei
    Luo, Zhiling
    Zhao, Ling
    Yang, Jun
    Pu, Lijin
    Hua, Baotong
    INTERNATIONAL HEART JOURNAL, 2015, 56 (03) : 293 - 297
  • [49] Cardiac memory in cardiac resynchronization therapy: A vectorcardiographic comparison of biventricular and left ventricular pacing
    Perrotta, Laura
    Ricciardi, Giuseppe
    Pieragnoli, Paolo
    Nesti, Martina
    Pontecorboli, Giulia
    Fantini, Fabio
    Padeletti, Luigi
    JOURNAL OF ELECTROCARDIOLOGY, 2015, 48 (04) : 571 - 577
  • [50] Left Ventricular Epicardial Leads Implantation with Concomitant Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy during Mitral Valve Replacement
    Liu, G. P.
    Ren, C. L.
    Wang, M. Y.
    Liu, B.
    Guo, Y.
    Zheng, N.
    Chen, T. T.
    Yang, R. D.
    Wang, R.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2024, 72 : S54 - S54