Impact of left ventricular pacing threshold on ventricular arrhythmia occurrence in cardiac resynchronization therapy

被引:2
|
作者
Ferri-Certic, Jerko [1 ]
Zavrl-Dzananovic, Dinko [2 ]
Lezaic, Luka [3 ]
Zizek, David [2 ]
机构
[1] Gen Hosp Dubrovnik, Dept Cardiol, Dubrovnik, Croatia
[2] Univ Med Ctr Ljubljana, Dept Cardiol, Zaloska 7, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia
[3] Univ Med Ctr Ljubljana, Dept Nucl Med, Ljubljana, Slovenia
关键词
Cardiac resynchronization therapy; Left ventricular pacing threshold; Ventricular arrhythmias; MYOCARDIAL VIABILITY; LEAD LOCATION; HEART; PREDICTORS; SCAR; DEFIBRILLATOR; INCREASE; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.jjcc.2019.03.015
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an established heart failure (HF) treatment option, however its effect on ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) is controversial. Regional scar burden and high left ventricular (LV) pacing threshold (PT) are associated with poor outcome in CRT patients. The aim of our study was to analyze the impact of intraoperative LVPT on VA occurrence. Methods: Eighty consecutive patients with advanced HF scheduled for a CRT defibrillator device [aged 63.3 +/- 10.9 years; New York Heart Association II-III 86.2%; 52 males (65%); 34 ischemic etiology (42.5%); 71 sinus rhythm (88.7%); QRS duration 168 +/- 25.7 ms] were evaluated using single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging. Regional myocardial viability was calculated as the mean tracer activity in the corresponding segments at the LV lead pacing site. Fluoroscopic position and intraoperative LVPT were determined at implant after the final LV lead position was determined. Results: LVPT was inversely associated with regional myocardial viability (rho -0.785, p < 0.001). After a median follow-up of 36 months (24-57) months VAs were registered in 27 patients (33.7%). Patients with VAs had higher median intraoperative LVPT compared to those without VAs [2.2 V (1.9-2.8) vs. 0.8 V (0.61.2), p < 0.001]. In a multivariate logistic regression model intraoperative LVPT was identified as a strong independent predictor of VAs. Conclusion: Increased intraoperative LVPT during CRT could be associated with lower regional myocardial viability at LV lead location. CRT patients with higher LVPT could have an increased risk of VA occurrence. (C) 2019 Japanese College of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:353 / 359
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Impact of ventricular arrhythmia management on suboptimal biventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Jan-Hendrik van den Bruck
    Melissa Middeldorp
    Arian Sultan
    Cornelia Scheurlen
    Katharina Seuthe
    Jonas Wörmann
    Karlo Filipovic
    Kadhim Kadhim
    Prashanthan Sanders
    Daniel Steven
    Jakob Lüker
    [J]. Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 2023, 66 : 353 - 361
  • [2] Impact of ventricular arrhythmia management on suboptimal biventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy
    van den Bruck, Jan-Hendrik
    Middeldorp, Melissa
    Sultan, Arian
    Scheurlen, Cornelia
    Seuthe, Katharina
    Woermann, Jonas
    Filipovic, Karlo
    Kadhim, Kadhim
    Sanders, Prashanthan
    Steven, Daniel
    Lueker, Jakob
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2023, 66 (02) : 353 - 361
  • [3] Multisite left ventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Gamble, James H. P.
    Betts, Tim R.
    [J]. FUTURE CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 10 (04) : 469 - 477
  • [4] Left Ventricular Enlargement, Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Efficacy, and Impact of MultiPoint Pacing
    Varma, Niraj
    Baker, James, II
    Tomassoni, Gery
    Love, Charles J.
    Martin, David
    Sheppard, Robert
    Niazi, Imran
    Cranke, Gary
    Lee, Kwangdeok
    Corbisiero, Raffaele
    [J]. CIRCULATION-ARRHYTHMIA AND ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2020, 13 (11): : E008680
  • [5] Right ventricular outflow tract pacing as an alternative to left ventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Alhous, H.
    Hannah, A.
    Small, G.
    Hillis, G.
    Broadhurst, P.
    [J]. SCOTTISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 56 (01) : 52 - 52
  • [6] Optimizing left ventricular pacing configurations for cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Lee, N
    Disch, D
    Tocco, P
    Botteron, GW
    Craddock, H
    Huelsing, DJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE, 2005, 11 (06) : S197 - S197
  • [7] Is Left Ventricular Endocardial Pacing the Future for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy?
    Morgan, John M.
    Wiles, Benedict M.
    [J]. REVISTA ESPANOLA DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2017, 70 (01): : 14 - 15
  • [8] Alternative Techniques for Left Ventricular Pacing in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
    Mihalcz, Attila
    Kassai, Imre
    Geller, Laszlo
    Szili-Torok, Tamas
    [J]. PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2014, 37 (02): : 255 - 261
  • [9] Impact of different left ventricular pacing sites on clinical outcome of cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Xiao, Yichao
    Zhou, Shenghua
    Li, Xuping
    Liu, Zhenjiang
    Yang, Hui
    Liu, Qiming
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 70 (16) : C130 - C130
  • [10] Impact of Higher Synchronized Left Ventricular Pacing Rate for Prognosis on Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
    Miyazaki, Yuichiro
    Ishibashi, Kohei
    Ueda, Nobuhiko
    Wakamiya, Akinori
    Shimamoto, Keiko
    Nakajima, Kenzaburo
    Kamakura, Tsukasa
    Wada, Mitsuru
    Inoue, Yuko
    Miyamoto, Koji
    Nagase, Satoshi
    Aiba, Takeshi
    Kusano, Kengo
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2022, 146