Impact of ventricular arrhythmia management on suboptimal biventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy

被引:2
|
作者
van den Bruck, Jan-Hendrik [1 ,2 ]
Middeldorp, Melissa [3 ,4 ]
Sultan, Arian [1 ,2 ]
Scheurlen, Cornelia [1 ,2 ]
Seuthe, Katharina [1 ,2 ]
Woermann, Jonas [1 ,2 ]
Filipovic, Karlo [1 ,2 ]
Kadhim, Kadhim [3 ,4 ]
Sanders, Prashanthan [3 ,4 ]
Steven, Daniel [1 ,2 ]
Lueker, Jakob [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cologne, Fac Med, Dept Electrophysiol, Kerpener Str 62, D-50937 Cologne, Germany
[2] Univ Hosp Cologne, Kerpener Str 62, D-50937 Cologne, Germany
[3] Univ Adelaide, Ctr Heart Rhythm Disorders, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[4] Royal Adelaide Hosp, Adelaide, SA, Australia
关键词
Catheter ablation of ventricular ectopy; Optimization of Cardiac resynchronization therapy; Catheter ablation for Optimization of biventricular pacing; RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION; HEART-FAILURE; ASSOCIATION; DEFIBRILLATOR; EFFICACY; OUTCOMES; BEATS;
D O I
10.1007/s10840-022-01259-0
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Reduced biventricular pacing (BiVP) is a common phenomenon in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with impact on CRT-response and patients' prognosis. Data on treatment strategies for patients with ventricular arrhythmia and BiVP reduction is sparse. We sought to assess the effects of ventricular arrhythmia treatment on BiVP. Methods In this retrospective analysis, the data of CRT patients with a reduced BiVP <= 97% due to ventricular arrhythmia were analyzed. Catheter ablation or intensified medical therapy was performed to optimize BiVP. Results We included 64 consecutive patients (73 +/- 10 years, 89% male, LVEF 30 +/- 7%). Of those, 22/64 patients (34%) underwent ablation of premature ventricular contractions (PVC) and 15/64 patients (23%) underwent ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation while 27/64 patients (42%) received intensified medical treatment. Baseline BiVP was 88.1%+/- 10.9%. An overall increase in BiVP percentage points of 8.8% (range - 5 to +47.6%) at 6-month follow-up was achieved. No changes in left ventricular function were observed but improvement in BiVP led to an improvement in NYHA class in 24/64 patients (38%). PVC ablation led to a significantly better improvement in BiVP [9.9% (range 4 to 22%) vs. 3.2% (range -5 to +10.7%); p= < 0.001] and NYHA class (12/22 patients vs. 4/27 patients; p = 0.003) than intensified medical therapy. All patients with VT and reduced BiVP underwent VT ablation with an increase of BiVP of 16.3 +/- 13.4%. Conclusion In this evaluation of ventricular arrhythmia treatment aiming for CRT optimization, both medical therapy and catheter ablation were shown to be effective. Compared to medical therapy, a higher increase in BiVP was observed after PVC ablation, and more patients improved in NYHA class.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:353 / 361
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Impact of ventricular arrhythmia management on suboptimal biventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Jan-Hendrik van den Bruck
    Melissa Middeldorp
    Arian Sultan
    Cornelia Scheurlen
    Katharina Seuthe
    Jonas Wörmann
    Karlo Filipovic
    Kadhim Kadhim
    Prashanthan Sanders
    Daniel Steven
    Jakob Lüker
    Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 2023, 66 : 353 - 361
  • [2] Impact of left ventricular pacing threshold on ventricular arrhythmia occurrence in cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Ferri-Certic, Jerko
    Zavrl-Dzananovic, Dinko
    Lezaic, Luka
    Zizek, David
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 74 (3-4) : 353 - 359
  • [3] Biventricular Pacing With Ventricular Fusion by Intrinsic Activation in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
    Guo, Tao
    Li, Ruijie
    Zhang, Limei
    Luo, Zhiling
    Zhao, Ling
    Yang, Jun
    Pu, Lijin
    Hua, Baotong
    INTERNATIONAL HEART JOURNAL, 2015, 56 (03) : 293 - 297
  • [4] Cardiac memory in cardiac resynchronization therapy: A vectorcardiographic comparison of biventricular and left ventricular pacing
    Perrotta, Laura
    Ricciardi, Giuseppe
    Pieragnoli, Paolo
    Nesti, Martina
    Pontecorboli, Giulia
    Fantini, Fabio
    Padeletti, Luigi
    JOURNAL OF ELECTROCARDIOLOGY, 2015, 48 (04) : 571 - 577
  • [5] Cardiac resynchronization therapy: Is atrial resynchronization important with biventricular pacing?
    Di Pede, F
    Gasparini, G
    Celestre, M
    Zuin, G
    De Piccoli, B
    Raviele, A
    CARDIAC ARRHYTHMIAS 2003, 2004, : 851 - 855
  • [6] Evaluation of synchronized left ventricular pacing rate over biventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Miyazaki, Yuichiro
    Ishibashi, Kohei
    Ueda, Nobuhiko
    Oka, Satoshi
    Wakamiya, Akinori
    Shimamoto, Keiko
    Nakajima, Kenzaburo
    Kamakura, Tsukasa
    Wada, Mitsuru
    Inoue, Yuko
    Miyamoto, Koji
    Nagase, Satoshi
    Aiba, Takeshi
    Kusano, Kengo
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2024, 84 (03) : 165 - 169
  • [7] Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Maximizing the Response to Biventricular Pacing
    Ng, Chee Yuan
    Heist, E. Kevin
    CARDIOLOGY IN REVIEW, 2017, 25 (01) : 6 - 11
  • [8] Invasive optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy: Role of sequential biventricular and left ventricular pacing
    Kurzidim, K
    Reinke, H
    Sperzel, J
    Schneider, HJ
    Danilovic, D
    Siemon, G
    Neumann, T
    Hamm, CW
    Pitschner, HF
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2005, 28 (08): : 754 - 761
  • [9] Left Bundle Branch Pacing vs Left Ventricular Septal Pacing vs Biventricular Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
    Diaz, Juan C.
    Tedrow, Usha B.
    Duque, Mauricio
    Aristizabal, Julian
    Braunstein, Eric D.
    Marin, Jorge
    Nino, Cesar
    Bastidas, Oriana
    Cabanillas, Nestor Lopez
    Koplan, Bruce A.
    Hoyos, Carolina
    Matos, Carlos D.
    Hincapie, Daniela
    Velasco, Alejandro
    Steiger, Nathaniel A.
    Kapur, Sunil
    Tadros, Thomas M.
    Zei, Paul C.
    Sauer, William H.
    Romero, Jorge E.
    JACC-CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2024, 10 (02) : 295 - 305
  • [10] Biventricular pacing decreases ventricular arrhythmia
    Dixon, SR
    O'Neill, WW
    Safian, RD
    Fry, JA
    Boura, JA
    Bowers, TA
    CIRCULATION, 2000, 102 (18) : 692 - 693