Activation sequence modification during cardiac resynchronization by manipulation of left ventricular epicardial pacing stimulus strength

被引:0
|
作者
Tedrow, Usha B.
Stevenson, William G.
Wood, Mark A.
Shepard, Richard K.
Hall, Kim
Pellegrini, Christine P.
Ellenbogen, Kenneth A.
机构
[1] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Cardiovasc, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Med Coll Virginia, Div Cardiovasc, Richmond, VA 23298 USA
来源
关键词
pacing; congestive heart failure;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Success of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) depends on altering electrical ventricular activation (VA) to achieve mechanical benefit. That increases in stimulus strength (SS) can affect VA has been demonstrated previously in cardiomyopathy patients undergoing ablation. Objective: To determine whether increasing SS can alter VA during CRT. Methods: In 71 patients with CRT devices, left ventricle (LV) pacing was performed at escalating SS. Timing from pacing stimulus to right ventricular (RV) electrogram, ECG morphology, and maximal QRS duration on 12 lead ECG were recorded. Results: Demographics: Baseline QRS duration 153 +/- 25 ms, ischemic cardiomyopathy 48%, ejection fraction 24% +/- 7%. With increased SS, conduction time from LV to right ventricle (RV) decreased from 125 +/- 56 ms to 111 +/- 59 ms (P = 0.006). QRS duration decreased from 212 +/- 46 ms to 194 +/- 42 ms (P = 0.0002). A marked change in QRS morphology occurred in 11/71 patients (15%). The RV ring was the anode in 6, while the RV coil was the anode in 5. Sites with change in QRS morphology showed decrease in conduction time from LV to RV from 110 +/- 60 ms to 64 +/- 68 ms (P = 0.04). Twelve patients (16%) had diaphragmatic stimulation with increased SS. Conclusions: Increasing LV SS reduces QRS duration and conduction time from LV to RV. Recognition of significant QRS morphology change is likely clinically important during LV threshold programming to avoid unintended VA change.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 69
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Right ventricular outflow tract pacing as an alternative to left ventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Alhous, H.
    Hannah, A.
    Small, G.
    Hillis, G.
    Broadhurst, P.
    SCOTTISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 56 (01) : 52 - 52
  • [32] Left ventricular performance during triggered left ventricular pacing in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy and left bundle branch block
    Witt, Christoffer Tobias
    Kronborg, Mads Brix
    Nohr, Ellen Aagaard
    Nielsen, Jens Cosedis
    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2016, 46 (03) : 345 - 351
  • [33] Left ventricular performance during triggered left ventricular pacing in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy and left bundle branch block
    Christoffer Tobias Witt
    Mads Brix Kronborg
    Ellen Aagaard Nohr
    Jens Cosedis Nielsen
    Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 2016, 46 : 345 - 351
  • [34] Thoracoscopic Implantation of Epicardial Left Ventricular Lead for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
    Kim, Hye Ree
    Lim, Kyunghee
    Park, Seung-Jung
    Park, Jong-Sung
    Kim, Ju Youn
    Chung, Suryeun
    Jung, Dong-Seop
    Park, Kyoung-Min
    On, Young Keun
    Kim, June Soo
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR DEVELOPMENT AND DISEASE, 2022, 9 (05)
  • [35] Surgical implantation of left ventricular epicardial leads for cardiac resynchronization - Reply
    Mair, H
    Daebritz, S
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2005, 28 (01) : 185 - 185
  • [36] Ventricular activation patterns during intrinsic conduction and right ventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy patients
    O'Donnell, David
    Manyam, Harish
    Pappone, Carlo
    Park, Seung-Jung
    Leclercq, Christophe
    Lunati, Maurizio
    Lercher, Peter
    Rordorf, Roberto
    Landolina, Maurizio
    Badie, Nima
    McSpadden, Luke C.
    Ryu, Kyungmoo
    Mangual, Jan O.
    Singh, Jagmeet P.
    Varma, Niraj
    Niazi, Imran K.
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2021, 44 (10): : 1663 - 1670
  • [37] Left bundle branch pacing vs ventricular septal pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Chen, Jingjing
    Ezzeddine, Fatima M.
    Liu, Xiaoke
    Vaidya, Vaibhav
    McLeod, Christopher J.
    Valverde, Arturo M.
    Munoz, Freddy Del-Carpio
    Deshmukh, Abhishek J.
    Madhavan, Malini
    Killu, Ammar M.
    Mulpuru, Siva K.
    Friedman, Paul A.
    Cha, Yong-Mei
    HEART RHYTHM O2, 2024, 5 (03): : 150 - 157
  • [38] Varying the left ventricular pacing vector affects myocardial performance during cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Morin, Daniel P.
    Mishra, Rakesh
    Shannon, Tracey
    Mittal, Suneet
    Markowitz, Steven M.
    Iwai, Sei
    Shah, Bindi K.
    Lerman, Bruce B.
    Stein, Kenneth M.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2007, 49 (09) : 19A - 20A
  • [39] Practical approach to implanting left ventricular pacing leads for cardiac resynchronization
    León, AR
    Delurgio, DB
    Mera, F
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2005, 16 (01) : 100 - 105
  • [40] Alternative left ventricular pacing approaches for optimal cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Galand, Vincent
    Singh, Jagmeet P.
    Leclercq, Christophe
    HEART RHYTHM, 2019, 16 (08) : 1281 - 1289