Collaborative Work Dynamics in Projects with Co-Production

被引:31
|
作者
Rahmani, Morvarid [1 ]
Roels, Guillaume [2 ]
Karmarkar, Uday S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Georgia Tech Scheller Coll Business, 800 West Peachtree St NW, Atlanta, GA 30308 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Anderson Sch Management, 110 Westwood Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
关键词
collaboration; project management; co-production; moral hazard; dynamic stochastic game; SEQUENTIAL ITERATION; MORAL HAZARD; INFORMATION; CONTRACTS; DESIGN; MODEL; INCENTIVES;
D O I
10.1111/poms.12670
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Many knowledge-intensive projects such as new product and software design, research, and high technology development have flexible scope and involve co-production between a client and a vendor. In such projects, it is often challenging to estimate how much progress can be achieved within a certain time window or how much time may be needed to achieve a certain degree of progress, especially because the client and vendor often adjust their efforts as a function of the project's progress, the time until the deadline, and the incentives in place. Effective contracts should therefore be flexible in scope and foster collaboration. In this study, we characterize the collaborative work dynamics of a client and a vendor who are engaged in a multi-state, multi-period stochastic project with a finite deadline. We show that when the client can verify the vendor's effort, it is optimal that they both exert high effort in one of two situations: when either not enough progress has been made and the deadline is close (deadline effect), or conversely, when so much progress has been made that the project state is close to a completion state set by the client (milestone effect). Hence, in this case, progress will typically be faster when the project is about to be stopped, due to either reaching the deadline or reaching the client's desired completion state. However, when the client cannot verify the vendor's effort, the vendor is prone to free-riding. Considering a time-based contract that pays the vendor a per-period fee and a fixed completion bonus, we show that the equilibrium completion state is decreasing in the per-period fee and increasing in the bonus, justifying the use of both incentive mechanisms in practice. Moreover, we show that, under such contracts, some form of milestone effect arises in equilibrium, but the deadline effect does not. Hence, in those cases, early progress will typically lead to early project conclusion at a high state; whereas, slow progress will typically make the project drag until the deadline while still at a low state.
引用
收藏
页码:686 / 703
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Collaborative Innovation in Public Administration: Theoretical Background and Research Trends of Co-Production and Co-Creation
    Jukic, Tina
    Pevcin, Primoz
    Bencina, Joze
    Decman, Mitja
    Vrbek, Sanja
    [J]. ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES, 2019, 9 (04)
  • [32] Collaborative Decision Making at the Client Interface: An Exploratory Case Study of Service Co-production
    Grace, Audrey
    Finnegan, Patrick
    Butler, Tom
    [J]. FUSING DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS INTO THE FABRIC OF THE CONTEXT, 2012, 238 : 229 - +
  • [33] From rules to collaborative practice: When regulatory mechanisms drive collective co-production
    Lino, Andre Feliciano
    Busanelli de Aquino, Andre Carlos
    de Azevedo, Ricardo Rocha
    Brumatti, Livia Martinez
    [J]. PUBLIC MONEY & MANAGEMENT, 2019, 39 (04) : 280 - 289
  • [34] Collaborative practices of knowledge work in IT projects
    Hetemi, Ermal
    Pushkina, Olga
    Zerjav, Vedran
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2022, 40 (08) : 906 - 920
  • [35] Local economics and co-production
    Boyle D.
    [J]. Development, 2010, 53 (3) : 319 - 324
  • [36] Service-user narratives in social work education; Co-production or co-option?
    Sapouna, Lydia
    [J]. SOCIAL WORK EDUCATION, 2021, 40 (04) : 505 - 521
  • [37] Co-production: a kind revolution
    Sophie Staniszewska
    Gary Hickey
    Pippa Coutts
    Ben Thurman
    Tina Coldham
    [J]. Research Involvement and Engagement, 8 (1)
  • [38] The regulatory aesthetics of co-production
    Evans, Penny
    Piccini, Angela
    [J]. IMPACT OF CO-PRODUCTION: FROM COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT TO SOCIAL JUSTICE, 2017, : 99 - 118
  • [39] Immersive experience in Co-production
    Dennis, Geoff
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTEGRATED CARE, 2021, 21
  • [40] Ethics and the co-production of knowledge
    Page, Katie
    [J]. PUBLIC HEALTH RESEARCH & PRACTICE, 2022, 32 (02):