From rules to collaborative practice: When regulatory mechanisms drive collective co-production

被引:6
|
作者
Lino, Andre Feliciano [1 ]
Busanelli de Aquino, Andre Carlos [1 ]
de Azevedo, Ricardo Rocha [2 ]
Brumatti, Livia Martinez [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Uberlandia, Uberlandia, MG, Brazil
关键词
Collective co-production; governance; institutional logics; municipal councils; participation; PUBLIC-SERVICES; PARTICIPATION; POLITICS; HEALTH; SPACES;
D O I
10.1080/09540962.2019.1592909
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
The paper develops an analysis of latent spaces of co-production enacted by the government. Based on a survey and interviews, the authors identified the elements of co-production logics which emerged from the interactions of members of Brazilian municipal health councils. Collective co-production emerges when members adhere to a set of norms and values which are favourable to co-operation. The paper explains how councils' regulatory mechanisms can drive the understanding of their members in relation to co-production and its benefits. IMPACT Policy-makers and practitioners need to understand that enacting legal regulations to engage citizens in public services can be a double-edged sword. More than relying on citizens' individual motivations, regulatory mechanisms must constantly promote citizens' ability to fulfil their roles in a co-productive relationship. Additionally, these mechanisms should enable citizens to mobilize their relevant skills to actively engage with the public sector. When regulatory mechanisms fail to create and maintain these elements, unexpected and undesirable outcomes can emerge. This paper explains how these outcomes can be avoided.
引用
收藏
页码:280 / 289
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [2] The regulatory aesthetics of co-production
    Evans, Penny
    Piccini, Angela
    [J]. IMPACT OF CO-PRODUCTION: FROM COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT TO SOCIAL JUSTICE, 2017, : 99 - 118
  • [3] Collaborative research and the co-production of knowledge for practice: an illustrative case study
    Janet Heaton
    Jo Day
    Nicky Britten
    [J]. Implementation Science, 11
  • [4] Collaborative research and the co-production of knowledge for practice: an illustrative case study
    Heaton, Janet
    Day, Jo
    Britten, Nicky
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2016, 11
  • [5] Collective Co-Production in Russian Schools
    Suslova, S.
    [J]. VOPROSY OBRAZOVANIYA-EDUCATIONAL STUDIES MOSCOW, 2016, (04): : 144 - 158
  • [6] Collective Action and the Sustainability of Co-Production
    Pestoff, Victor
    [J]. PUBLIC MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2014, 16 (03) : 383 - 401
  • [7] Collaborative Work Dynamics in Projects with Co-Production
    Rahmani, Morvarid
    Roels, Guillaume
    Karmarkar, Uday S.
    [J]. PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2017, 26 (04) : 686 - 703
  • [8] Co-production in healthcare: rhetoric and practice
    Vennik, Femke D.
    van de Bovenkamp, Hester M.
    Putters, Kim
    Grit, Kor J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES, 2016, 82 (01) : 150 - 168
  • [9] The limits of co-production: linking regulatory capacity to co-production of authoritative knowledge for environmental policy
    Large, Daniel
    [J]. SCIENCE AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2024,
  • [10] Individual, Group, and Collective Co-production: The Role of Public Value Conceptions in Shaping Co-production Practices
    McMullin, Caitlin
    [J]. ADMINISTRATION & SOCIETY, 2023, 55 (02) : 239 - 263