Collaborative research and the co-production of knowledge for practice: an illustrative case study

被引:122
|
作者
Heaton, Janet [1 ]
Day, Jo [1 ]
Britten, Nicky [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Exeter, Inst Hlth Res, Sch Med, St Lukes Campus, Exeter EX1 2SL, Devon, England
来源
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE | 2016年 / 11卷
关键词
Collaborative health research; Co-production; Knowledge translation; APPLIED HEALTH RESEARCH; LEADERSHIP; PROGRAM; CARE; TRANSLATION; STRATEGIES; ENGLAND; CLAHRCS;
D O I
10.1186/s13012-016-0383-9
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: In 2008, the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) began funding a major 5-year pilot research programme of translational research in England, establishing nine 'Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care' (CLAHRCs). A number of evaluations were carried out to examine whether or not the various collaborations worked as intended and why. In this paper, we examine what the theory of co-production adds to understanding of processes of knowledge creation and translation we observed in one of the CLAHRCs. Methods: A case study of a successful knowledge translation project was identified from our wider realist evaluation of the mechanisms of closer collaboration at play in the CLAHRC. In the project, a computer simulation model of an emergency pathway for acute ischaemic stroke was built to explore if and how the time between the onset and treatment of the condition could be minimised by redesigning the pathway. The aim of the case study was to improve our understanding of the nature and workings of the mechanisms of closer collaboration that were associated with the more successful projects by examining the relevance of the theory of co-production. Qualitative methods of analysis were used to explore the fit between the mechanisms of closer collaboration we observed in the realist evaluation and the principles of co-production we identified from the literature. Results: We found a close fit between the nine mechanisms of closer collaboration at work in the project and the principles of co-production (active agents; equality of partners; reciprocity and mutuality; transformative; and facilitated). The successful style of collaborative working exemplified by the project was consistent with a strong form of co-production. Conclusions: In our view, the theory of co-production provides useful insights into what it is about the qualities of collaborative working that inspire the requisite mechanisms for generating knowledge that is translated into practice. The theory provides a potentially useful basis for future knowledge translation programmes and projects in applied health research in a range of contexts.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Collaborative research and the co-production of knowledge for practice: an illustrative case study
    Janet Heaton
    Jo Day
    Nicky Britten
    [J]. Implementation Science, 11
  • [2] Collaborative research involving small companies: Experiences from co-production of knowledge for research and practice through use of an action case approach
    Lundell, Bjorn
    Gamalielsson, Jonas
    [J]. 2017 IEEE/ACM 4TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING RESEARCH AND INDUSTRIAL PRACTICE (SER&IP 2017), 2017, : 24 - 30
  • [3] Institutional Determinants of Co-Production: Norway as an Illustrative Case
    Traetteberg, Hakon Solbu
    Enjolras, Bernard
    [J]. NONPROFIT AND VOLUNTARY SECTOR QUARTERLY, 2024, 53 (02) : 536 - 559
  • [4] Knowledge Co-production at the Research–Practice Interface: Embedded Case Studies from Urban Forestry
    Lindsay K. Campbell
    Erika S. Svendsen
    Lara A. Roman
    [J]. Environmental Management, 2016, 57 : 1262 - 1280
  • [5] Knowledge Co-production at the Research-Practice Interface: Embedded Case Studies from Urban Forestry
    Campbell, Lindsay K.
    Svendsen, Erika S.
    Roman, Lara A.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2016, 57 (06) : 1262 - 1280
  • [6] Principles for knowledge co-production in sustainability research
    Albert V. Norström
    Christopher Cvitanovic
    Marie F. Löf
    Simon West
    Carina Wyborn
    Patricia Balvanera
    Angela T. Bednarek
    Elena M. Bennett
    Reinette Biggs
    Ariane de Bremond
    Bruce M. Campbell
    Josep G. Canadell
    Stephen R. Carpenter
    Carl Folke
    Elizabeth A. Fulton
    Owen Gaffney
    Stefan Gelcich
    Jean-Baptiste Jouffray
    Melissa Leach
    Martin Le Tissier
    Berta Martín-López
    Elena Louder
    Marie-France Loutre
    Alison M. Meadow
    Harini Nagendra
    Davnah Payne
    Garry D. Peterson
    Belinda Reyers
    Robert Scholes
    Chinwe Ifejika Speranza
    Marja Spierenburg
    Mark Stafford-Smith
    Maria Tengö
    Sandra van der Hel
    Ingrid van Putten
    Henrik Österblom
    [J]. Nature Sustainability, 2020, 3 : 182 - 190
  • [7] Principles for knowledge co-production in sustainability research
    Norstrom, Albert, V
    Cvitanovic, Christopher
    Lof, Marie F.
    West, Simon
    Wyborn, Carina
    Balvanera, Patricia
    Bednarek, Angela T.
    Bennett, Elena M.
    Biggs, Reinette
    de Bremond, Ariane
    Campbell, Bruce M.
    Canadell, Josep G.
    Carpenter, Stephen R.
    Folke, Carl
    Fulton, Elizabeth A.
    Gaffney, Owen
    Gelcich, Stefan
    Jouffray, Jean-Baptiste
    Leach, Melissa
    Le Tissier, Martin
    Martin-Lopez, Berta
    Louder, Elena
    Loutre, Marie-France
    Meadow, Alison M.
    Nagendra, Harini
    Payne, Davnah
    Peterson, Garry D.
    Reyers, Belinda
    Scholes, Robert
    Speranza, Chinwe Ifejika
    Spierenburg, Marja
    Stafford-Smith, Mark
    Tengo, Maria
    van der Hel, Sandra
    van Putten, Ingrid
    Osterblom, Henrik
    [J]. NATURE SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 3 (03) : 182 - 190
  • [8] Sharing knowledge: Performing co-production in collaborative artistic work
    Richardson, Lizzie
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING A-ECONOMY AND SPACE, 2016, 48 (11): : 2256 - 2271
  • [9] Learning from knowledge co-production research and practice in the twenty-first century: global lessons and what they mean for collaborative research in Nunatsiavut
    Melanie Zurba
    Michael A. Petriello
    Carly Madge
    Paul McCarney
    Breanna Bishop
    Samantha McBeth
    Mary Denniston
    Hekia Bodwitch
    Megan Bailey
    [J]. Sustainability Science, 2022, 17 : 449 - 467
  • [10] Learning from knowledge co-production research and practice in the twenty-first century: global lessons and what they mean for collaborative research in Nunatsiavut
    Zurba, Melanie
    Petriello, Michael A.
    Madge, Carly
    McCarney, Paul
    Bishop, Breanna
    McBeth, Samantha
    Denniston, Mary
    Bodwitch, Hekia
    Bailey, Megan
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE, 2022, 17 (02) : 449 - 467