Improved estimates of forest vegetation structure and biomass with a LiDAR-optimized sampling design

被引:90
|
作者
Hawbaker, Todd J. [1 ]
Keuler, Nicholas S. [2 ]
Lesak, Adrian A. [1 ]
Gobakken, Terje [3 ]
Contrucci, Kirk [4 ]
Radeloff, Volker C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Forest & Wildlife Ecol, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Stat, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[3] Norwegian Univ Life Sci, Dept Ecol & Nat Resource Management, NO-1432 As, Norway
[4] Ayers Associates Inc, Madison, WI 53704 USA
关键词
LEAF-AREA INDEX; SMALL-FOOTPRINT; DECIDUOUS FOREST; DENSITY LIDAR; TREE HEIGHT; LASER; LANDSAT; VOLUME; INVENTORY; IMAGERY;
D O I
10.1029/2008JG000870
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
LiDAR data are increasingly available from both airborne and spaceborne missions to map elevation and vegetation structure. Additionally, global coverage may soon become available with NASA's planned DESDynI sensor. However, substantial challenges remain to using the growing body of LiDAR data. First, the large volumes of data generated by LiDAR sensors require efficient processing methods. Second, efficient sampling methods are needed to collect the field data used to relate LiDAR data with vegetation structure. In this paper, we used low-density LiDAR data, summarized within pixels of a regular grid, to estimate forest structure and biomass across a 53,600 ha study area in northeastern Wisconsin. Additionally, we compared the predictive ability of models constructed from a random sample to a sample stratified using mean and standard deviation of LiDAR heights. Our models explained between 65 to 88% of the variability in DBH, basal area, tree height, and biomass. Prediction errors from models constructed using a random sample were up to 68% larger than those from the models built with a stratified sample. The stratified sample included a greater range of variability than the random sample. Thus, applying the random sample model to the entire population violated a tenet of regression analysis; namely, that models should not be used to extrapolate beyond the range of data from which they were constructed. Our results highlight that LiDAR data integrated with field data sampling designs can provide broad-scale assessments of vegetation structure and biomass, i.e., information crucial for carbon and biodiversity science.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Deciduous Forest Structure Estimated with LIDAR-Optimized Spectral Remote Sensing
    Defibaugh y Chavez, Jason
    Tullis, Jason A.
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2013, 5 (01) : 155 - 182
  • [2] The uncertainty of biomass estimates from LiDAR and SAR across a boreal forest structure gradient
    Montesano, P. M.
    Nelson, R. F.
    Dubayah, R. O.
    Sun, G.
    Cook, B. D.
    Ranson, K. J. R.
    Raesset, E. N.
    Kharuk, V.
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 154 : 398 - 407
  • [3] Connecting spaceborne lidar with NFI networks: A method for improved estimation of forest structure and biomass
    May, Paul B.
    Dubayah, Ralph O.
    Bruening, Jamis M.
    Gaines III, George C.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATION AND GEOINFORMATION, 2024, 129
  • [4] FUSION OF LIDAR AND RADAR FOR VEGETATION STRUCTURE AND BIOMASS RETRIEVAL
    Ni-Meister, Wenge
    [J]. 2016 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM (IGARSS), 2016, : 5346 - 5349
  • [5] Effects of LiDAR point density and landscape context on estimates of urban forest biomass
    Singh, Kunwar K.
    Chen, Gang
    McCarter, James B.
    Meentemeyer, Ross K.
    [J]. ISPRS JOURNAL OF PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND REMOTE SENSING, 2015, 101 : 310 - 322
  • [6] Lidar Aboveground Vegetation Biomass Estimates in Shrublands: Prediction, Uncertainties and Application to Coarser Scales
    Li, Aihua
    Dhakal, Shital
    Glenn, Nancy F.
    Spaete, Lucas P.
    Shinneman, Douglas J.
    Pilliod, David S.
    Arkle, Robert S.
    McIlroy, Susan K.
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2017, 9 (09)
  • [7] LiDAR data transects: a sampling strategy to estimate aboveground biomass in forest areas
    Delia Ortiz-Reyes, Alma
    Rene Valdez-Lazalde, Jose
    Angeles-Perez, Gregorio
    De los Santos-Posadas, Hector M.
    Schneider, Laura
    Arturo Aguirre-Salado, Carlos
    Peduzzi, Alicia
    [J]. MADERA Y BOSQUES, 2019, 25 (03):
  • [8] Satellite lidar vs. small footprint airborne lidar: Comparing the accuracy of aboveground biomass estimates and forest structure metrics at footprint level
    Popescu, Sorin C.
    Zhao, Kaiguang
    Neuenschwander, Amy
    Lin, Chinsu
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2011, 115 (11) : 2786 - 2797
  • [9] Achieving accuracy requirements for forest biomass mapping: A spaceborne data fusion method for estimating forest biomass and LiDAR sampling error
    Montesano, P. M.
    Cook, B. D.
    Sun, G.
    Simard, M.
    Nelson, R. F.
    Ranson, K. J.
    Zhang, Z.
    Luthcke, S.
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 130 : 153 - 170
  • [10] A study of forest biomass estimates from lidar in the northern temperate forests of New England
    Ahmed, Razi
    Siqueira, Paul
    Hensley, Scott
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 130 : 121 - 135