Lidar Aboveground Vegetation Biomass Estimates in Shrublands: Prediction, Uncertainties and Application to Coarser Scales

被引:55
|
作者
Li, Aihua [1 ]
Dhakal, Shital [1 ]
Glenn, Nancy F. [1 ]
Spaete, Lucas P. [1 ]
Shinneman, Douglas J. [2 ]
Pilliod, David S. [2 ]
Arkle, Robert S. [2 ]
McIlroy, Susan K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Boise State Univ, Dept Geosci, 1910 Univ Dr, Boise, ID 83725 USA
[2] US Geol Survey, Forest & Rangeland Ecosyst Sci Ctr, 970 Lusk St Boise, Boise, ID 83706 USA
关键词
above ground carbon; machine learning; Lidar; above ground biomass; drylands; semi-arid; rangelands; SAGEBRUSH STEPPE; AIRBORNE LIDAR; RANDOM FORESTS; LEAF-AREA; TERRESTRIAL; CLASSIFICATION; HEIGHT; SINGLE; FIRE; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.3390/rs9090903
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Our study objectives were to model the aboveground biomass in a xeric shrub-steppe landscape with airborne light detection and ranging (Lidar) and explore the uncertainty associated with the models we created. We incorporated vegetation vertical structure information obtained from Lidar with ground-measured biomass data, allowing us to scale shrub biomass from small field sites (1 m subplots and 1 ha plots) to a larger landscape. A series of airborne Lidar-derived vegetation metrics were trained and linked with the field-measured biomass in Random Forests (RF) regression models. A Stepwise Multiple Regression (SMR) model was also explored as a comparison. Our results demonstrated that the important predictors from Lidar-derived metrics had a strong correlation with field-measured biomass in the RF regression models with a pseudo R-2 of 0.76 and RMSE of 125 g/m(2) for shrub biomass and a pseudo R-2 of 0.74 and RMSE of 141 g/m(2) for total biomass, and a weak correlation with field-measured herbaceous biomass. The SMR results were similar but slightly better than RF, explaining 77-79% of the variance, with RMSE ranging from 120 to 129 g/m(2) for shrub and total biomass, respectively. We further explored the computational efficiency and relative accuracies of using point cloud and raster Lidar metrics at different resolutions (1 m to 1 ha). Metrics derived from the Lidar point cloud processing led to improved biomass estimates at nearly all resolutions in comparison to raster-derived Lidar metrics. Only at 1 m were the results from the point cloud and raster products nearly equivalent. The best Lidar prediction models of biomass at the plot-level (1 ha) were achieved when Lidar metrics were derived from an average of fine resolution (1 m) metrics to minimize boundary effects and to smooth variability. Overall, both RF and SMR methods explained more than 74% of the variance in biomass, with the most important Lidar variables being associated with vegetation structure and statistical measures of this structure (e.g., standard deviation of height was a strong predictor of biomass). Using our model results, we developed spatially-explicit Lidar estimates of total and shrub biomass across our study site in the Great Basin, U.S.A., for monitoring and planning in this imperiled ecosystem.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Challenges to aboveground biomass prediction from waveform lidar
    Bruening, Jamis M.
    Fischer, Rico
    Bohn, Friedrich J.
    Armston, John
    Armstrong, Amanda H.
    Knapp, Nikolai
    Tang, Hao
    Huth, Andreas
    Dubayah, Ralph
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2021, 16 (12):
  • [2] STATEWIDE MAPPING AND ESTIMATION OF VEGETATION ABOVEGROUND BIOMASS USING AIRBORNE LIDAR
    Chen, Qi
    McRoberts, Ronald
    [J]. 2016 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM (IGARSS), 2016, : 4442 - 4444
  • [3] Towards Prediction and Mapping of Grassland Aboveground Biomass Using Handheld LiDAR
    de Nobel, Jeroen S.
    Rijsdijk, Kenneth F.
    Cornelissen, Perry
    Seijmonsbergen, Arie C.
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2023, 15 (07)
  • [4] Aboveground biomass estimates of sagebrush using terrestrial and airborne LiDAR data in a dryland ecosystem
    Li, Aihua
    Glenn, Nancy F.
    Olsoy, Peter J.
    Mitchell, Jessica J.
    Shrestha, Rupesh
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2015, 213 : 138 - 147
  • [5] Airborne LIDAR-Derived Aboveground Biomass Estimates Using a Hierarchical Bayesian Approach
    Wang, Mengxi
    Liu, Qingwang
    Fu, Liyong
    Wang, Guangxing
    Zhang, Xiongqing
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2019, 11 (09)
  • [6] Quantification of uncertainty in aboveground biomass estimates derived from small-footprint airborne LiDAR
    Xu, Qing
    Man, Albert
    Fredrickson, Mark
    Hou, Zhengyang
    Pitkanen, Juho
    Wing, Brian
    Ramirez, Carlos
    Li, Bo
    Greenberg, Jonathan A.
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 216 : 514 - 528
  • [7] Combining lidar estimates of aboveground biomass and Landsat estimates of stand age for spatially extensive validation of modeled forest productivity
    Lefsky, MA
    Turner, DP
    Guzy, M
    Cohen, WB
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2005, 95 (04) : 549 - 558
  • [8] Integration of airborne lidar and vegetation types derived from aerial photography for mapping aboveground live biomass
    Chen, Qi
    Laurin, Gaia Vaglio
    Battles, John J.
    Saah, David
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 121 : 108 - 117
  • [9] Examination of uncertainty in per unit area estimates of aboveground biomass using terrestrial LiDAR and ground data
    Shettles, Michael
    Hilker, Thomas
    Temesgen, Hailemariam
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH, 2016, 46 (05) : 706 - 715
  • [10] ASSESSMENT OF THE MAPPING OF ABOVEGROUND BIOMASS AND ITS UNCERTAINTIES USING FIELD MEASUREMENTS, AIRBORNE LIDAR AND SATELLITE DATA IN MEXICO
    Urbazaev, Mikhail
    Thiel, Christian
    Cremer, Felix
    Schmullius, Christiane
    [J]. IGARSS 2018 - 2018 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM, 2018, : 8793 - 8796