Improved estimates of forest vegetation structure and biomass with a LiDAR-optimized sampling design

被引:90
|
作者
Hawbaker, Todd J. [1 ]
Keuler, Nicholas S. [2 ]
Lesak, Adrian A. [1 ]
Gobakken, Terje [3 ]
Contrucci, Kirk [4 ]
Radeloff, Volker C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Forest & Wildlife Ecol, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Stat, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[3] Norwegian Univ Life Sci, Dept Ecol & Nat Resource Management, NO-1432 As, Norway
[4] Ayers Associates Inc, Madison, WI 53704 USA
关键词
LEAF-AREA INDEX; SMALL-FOOTPRINT; DECIDUOUS FOREST; DENSITY LIDAR; TREE HEIGHT; LASER; LANDSAT; VOLUME; INVENTORY; IMAGERY;
D O I
10.1029/2008JG000870
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
LiDAR data are increasingly available from both airborne and spaceborne missions to map elevation and vegetation structure. Additionally, global coverage may soon become available with NASA's planned DESDynI sensor. However, substantial challenges remain to using the growing body of LiDAR data. First, the large volumes of data generated by LiDAR sensors require efficient processing methods. Second, efficient sampling methods are needed to collect the field data used to relate LiDAR data with vegetation structure. In this paper, we used low-density LiDAR data, summarized within pixels of a regular grid, to estimate forest structure and biomass across a 53,600 ha study area in northeastern Wisconsin. Additionally, we compared the predictive ability of models constructed from a random sample to a sample stratified using mean and standard deviation of LiDAR heights. Our models explained between 65 to 88% of the variability in DBH, basal area, tree height, and biomass. Prediction errors from models constructed using a random sample were up to 68% larger than those from the models built with a stratified sample. The stratified sample included a greater range of variability than the random sample. Thus, applying the random sample model to the entire population violated a tenet of regression analysis; namely, that models should not be used to extrapolate beyond the range of data from which they were constructed. Our results highlight that LiDAR data integrated with field data sampling designs can provide broad-scale assessments of vegetation structure and biomass, i.e., information crucial for carbon and biodiversity science.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comprehensive comparison of airborne and spaceborne SAR and LiDAR estimates of forest structure in the tallest mangrove forest on earth
    Stovall, Atticus E. L.
    Fatoyinbo, Temilola
    Thomas, Nthan M.
    Armston, John
    Ebanega, Medard Obiang
    Simard, Marc
    Trettin, Carl
    Zogo, Robert Vancelas Obiang
    Aken, Igor Akendengue
    Debina, Michael
    Kemoe, Alphna Mekui Me
    Assoumou, Emmanuel Ondo
    Kim, Jun Su
    Lagomasino, David
    Lee, Seung-Kuk
    Obame, Jean Calvin Ndong
    Voubou, Geldin Derrick
    Essono, Chamberlain Zame
    [J]. SCIENCE OF REMOTE SENSING, 2021, 4
  • [22] Influence of Sampling Design Parameters on Biomass Predictions Derived from Airborne LiDAR Data
    Bouvier, Marc
    Durrieu, Sylvie
    Fournier, Richard A.
    Saint-Geours, Nathalie
    Guyon, Dominique
    Grau, Eloi
    de Boissieu, Florian
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2019, 45 (05) : 650 - 672
  • [23] Assessment of Errors Caused by Forest Vegetation Structure in Airborne LiDAR-Derived DTMs
    Simpson, Jake E.
    Smith, Thomas E. L.
    Wooster, Martin J.
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2017, 9 (11):
  • [24] Improved forest biomass estimates using ALOS AVNIR-2 texture indices
    Sarker, Latifur Rahman
    Nichol, Janet E.
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2011, 115 (04) : 968 - 977
  • [25] LIDAR-assisted forest inventory: effect of return density and sampling design on accuracy
    Galeote-Leyva, Bernardo
    Rene Valdez-Lazalde, Jose
    Angeles-Perez, Gregorio
    Manuel de los Santos-Posadas, Hector
    Manuel Romero-Padilla, Juan
    [J]. MADERA Y BOSQUES, 2022, 28 (02)
  • [26] Measuring forest structure and biomass in New England forest stands using Echidna ground-based lidar
    Yao, Tian
    Yang, Xiaoyuan
    Zhao, Feng
    Wang, Zhuosen
    Zhang, Qingling
    Jupp, David
    Lovell, Jenny
    Culvenor, Darius
    Newnham, Glenn
    Ni-Meister, Wenge
    Schaaf, Crystal
    Woodcock, Curtis
    Wang, Jindi
    Li, Xiaowen
    Strahler, Alan
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2011, 115 (11) : 2965 - 2974
  • [27] Allometric equation choice impacts lidar-based forest biomass estimates: A case study from the Sierra National Forest, CA
    Zhao, Feng
    Guo, Qinghua
    Kelly, Maggi
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2012, 165 : 64 - 72
  • [28] Impact of leaf phenology on estimates of aboveground biomass density in a deciduous broadleaf forest from simulated GEDI lidar
    Cushman, K. C.
    Armston, John
    Dubayah, Ralph
    Duncanson, Laura
    Hancock, Steven
    Janik, David
    Kral, Kamil
    Krucek, Martin
    Minor, David M.
    Tang, Hao
    Kellner, James R.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2023, 18 (06)
  • [29] Ocular estimates of understory vegetation structure in a closed Picea glauca/Betula papyrifera forest
    van Hees, W
    Mead, BR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VEGETATION SCIENCE, 2000, 11 (02) : 195 - 200
  • [30] BACKSCATTERING OF INDIVIDUAL LIDAR PULSES FROM FOREST CANOPIES EXPLAINED BY PHOTOGRAMMETRICALLY DERIVED VEGETATION STRUCTURE
    Korpela, I.
    Hovi, A.
    Korhonen, L.
    [J]. ISPRS HANNOVER WORKSHOP 2013, 2013, 40-1 (W-1): : 171 - 176