Improved estimates of forest vegetation structure and biomass with a LiDAR-optimized sampling design

被引:90
|
作者
Hawbaker, Todd J. [1 ]
Keuler, Nicholas S. [2 ]
Lesak, Adrian A. [1 ]
Gobakken, Terje [3 ]
Contrucci, Kirk [4 ]
Radeloff, Volker C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Forest & Wildlife Ecol, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Stat, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[3] Norwegian Univ Life Sci, Dept Ecol & Nat Resource Management, NO-1432 As, Norway
[4] Ayers Associates Inc, Madison, WI 53704 USA
关键词
LEAF-AREA INDEX; SMALL-FOOTPRINT; DECIDUOUS FOREST; DENSITY LIDAR; TREE HEIGHT; LASER; LANDSAT; VOLUME; INVENTORY; IMAGERY;
D O I
10.1029/2008JG000870
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
LiDAR data are increasingly available from both airborne and spaceborne missions to map elevation and vegetation structure. Additionally, global coverage may soon become available with NASA's planned DESDynI sensor. However, substantial challenges remain to using the growing body of LiDAR data. First, the large volumes of data generated by LiDAR sensors require efficient processing methods. Second, efficient sampling methods are needed to collect the field data used to relate LiDAR data with vegetation structure. In this paper, we used low-density LiDAR data, summarized within pixels of a regular grid, to estimate forest structure and biomass across a 53,600 ha study area in northeastern Wisconsin. Additionally, we compared the predictive ability of models constructed from a random sample to a sample stratified using mean and standard deviation of LiDAR heights. Our models explained between 65 to 88% of the variability in DBH, basal area, tree height, and biomass. Prediction errors from models constructed using a random sample were up to 68% larger than those from the models built with a stratified sample. The stratified sample included a greater range of variability than the random sample. Thus, applying the random sample model to the entire population violated a tenet of regression analysis; namely, that models should not be used to extrapolate beyond the range of data from which they were constructed. Our results highlight that LiDAR data integrated with field data sampling designs can provide broad-scale assessments of vegetation structure and biomass, i.e., information crucial for carbon and biodiversity science.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Enhancing airborne LiDAR data for improved forest structure representation in shortwave transmission models
    Webster, Clare
    Mazzotti, Giulia
    Essery, Richard
    Jonas, Tobias
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 249
  • [42] Structure metrics to generalize biomass estimation from lidar across forest types from different continents
    Knapp, Nikolai
    Fischer, Rico
    Cazcarra-Bes, Victor
    Huth, Andreas
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 237
  • [43] Potential of ALOS2 and NDVI to Estimate Forest Above-Ground Biomass, and Comparison with Lidar-Derived Estimates
    Laurin, Gaia Vaglio
    Pirotti, Francesco
    Callegari, Mattia
    Chen, Qi
    Cuozzo, Giovanni
    Lingua, Emanuele
    Notarnicola, Claudia
    Papale, Dario
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2017, 9 (01):
  • [44] Novel forest structure metrics from airborne LiDAR data for improved snow interception estimation
    Moeser, D.
    Morsdorf, F.
    Jonas, T.
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2015, 208 : 40 - 49
  • [45] Occupancy of red-naped sapsuckers in a coniferous forest: using LiDAR to understand effects of vegetation structure and disturbance
    Holbrook, Joseph D.
    Vierling, Kerri T.
    Vierling, Lee A.
    Hudak, Andrew T.
    Adam, Patrick
    [J]. ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2015, 5 (22): : 5383 - 5393
  • [46] Using lidar and effective LAI data to evaluate IKONOS and Landsat 7 ETM+ vegetation cover estimates in a ponderosa pine forest
    Chen, XX
    Vierling, L
    Rowell, E
    DeFelice, T
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2004, 91 (01) : 14 - 26
  • [47] Quantitative analysis of woodpecker habitat using high-resolution airborne LiDAR estimates of forest structure and composition
    Garabedian, James E.
    McGaughey, Robert J.
    Reutebuch, Stephen E.
    Parresol, Bernard R.
    Kilgo, John C.
    Moorman, Christopher E.
    Peterson, M. Nils
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 145 : 68 - 80
  • [48] Adjudicating Perspectives on Forest Structure: How Do Airborne, Terrestrial, and Mobile Lidar-Derived Estimates Compare?
    Donager, Jonathon J.
    Meador, Andrew J. Sanchez
    Blackburn, Ryan C.
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2021, 13 (12)
  • [49] Spatial variations in throughfall in a Moso bamboo forest: sampling design for the estimates of stand-scale throughfall
    Shinohara, Yoshinori
    Onozawa, Yuka
    Chiwa, Masaaki
    Kume, Tomonori
    Komatsu, Hikaru
    Otsuki, Kyoichi
    [J]. HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2010, 24 (03) : 253 - 259
  • [50] THE POTENTIAL OF FOREST BIOMASS INVERSION BASED ON CANOPY-INDEPENDENT STRUCTURE METRICS TESTED BY AIRBORNE LIDAR DATA
    Wang, Qiang
    Ni-Meister, Wenge
    Ni, Wenjian
    Pang, Yong
    [J]. 2019 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM (IGARSS 2019), 2019, : 7354 - 7357