Simulating the impact of Grain-for-Green Programme on ecosystem services trade-offs in Northwestern Yunnan, China

被引:148
|
作者
Peng, Jian [1 ,2 ]
Hu, Xiaoxu [1 ]
Wang, Xiaoyu [2 ]
Meersmans, Jeroen [3 ]
Liu, Yanxu [4 ]
Qiu, Sijing [1 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Coll Urban & Environm Sci, Minist Educ, Lab Earth Surface Proc, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
[2] Peking Univ, Shenzhen Grad Sch, Sch Urban Planning & Design, Key Lab Environm & Urban Sci, Shenzhen 518055, Peoples R China
[3] Cranfield Univ, Sch Water Energy & Environm, Cranfield Soil & Agrifood Inst, Cranfield MK43 0AL, Beds, England
[4] Beijing Normal Univ, Fac Geog Sci, State Key Lab Earth Surface Proc & Resource Ecol, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Grain-for-Green Programme; Ecosystem services trade-offs; Scenario analysis; Northwestern Yunnan; LAND-USE SCENARIOS; SOIL-EROSION; URBAN EXPANSION; RIVER-BASIN; CARBON; SUSTAINABILITY; DYNAMICS; BIODIVERSITY; SHAANXI; REGION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100998
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
One of the main manifestations of the Grain-for-Green Programme ( GFGP) is land use change, which will affect the trade-off of ecosystem services. Since the implementation of the GFGP in Dali Autonomous Prefecture in 2000, land use/cover has undergone dramatic changes. This study used the CLUE-S model to simulate land use change in 2030, and explored the spatial pattern and relationship of different ecosystem services under the four scenarios of GFGP. The results show that, GFGP can help to improve indirect services of ecosystems, such as carbon storage and soil conservation. However, direct services of the ecosystem will decline, such as food production and water yield. Compared with 2010, the overall supply level of the four ecosystem services is the most balanced in the moderate GFGP scenario. In this scenario, total food production decreased by 179,000 tons and water yield decreased by 57 million cubic meters. Carbon storage and soil conservation continued to grow, increasing by 21.86 million tons and 17.87 million tons, respectively. The changes of ecosystem services in the strong GFGP scenario are extreme. The increases in carbon storage and soil conservation are at the expense of a significant reduction in food production and water yield. It can be concluded that GFGP may lead to intensifying ecosystem services trade-offs. Through comparing the changes of ecosystem services under different GFGP scenarios, it is found that the implementation intensity of GFGP should be deeply concerned in policy making.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Trade-offs between forest ecosystem services
    Wang, Shuai
    Fu, Bojie
    [J]. FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2013, 26 : 145 - 146
  • [22] The impact of secondary forest restoration on multiple ecosystem services and their trade-offs
    Zeng, Yelin
    Gou, Mengmeng
    Ouyang, Shuai
    Chen, Liang
    Fang, Xi
    Zhao, Lijuan
    Li, Jiaxiang
    Peng, Changhui
    Xiang, Wenhua
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2019, 104 : 248 - 258
  • [23] The tradeoff and synergy between ecosystem services in the Grain-for-Green areas in Northern Shaanxi, China
    Jia, Xiaoqing
    Fu, Bojie
    Feng, Xiaoming
    Hou, Guohua
    Liu, Yu
    Wang, Xiaofeng
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2014, 43 : 103 - 113
  • [24] Trade-offs among ecosystem services in a typical Karst watershed, SW China
    Tian, Yichao
    Wang, Shijie
    Bai, Xiaoyong
    Luo, Guangjie
    Xu, Yan
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 566 : 1297 - 1308
  • [25] Spatial Trade-Offs and Synergies between Ecosystem Services in Guangdong Province, China
    Xu, Qian
    Yang, Ying
    Yang, Ren
    Zha, Li-Si
    Lin, Zi-Qing
    Shang, Shu-Hao
    [J]. LAND, 2024, 13 (01)
  • [26] Impacts of Grain-for-Green and Grain-for-Blue Policies on Valued Ecosystem Services in Shandong Province, China
    Song, Wei
    Deng, Xiangzheng
    Liu, Bing
    Li, Zhaohua
    Jin, Gui
    [J]. ADVANCES IN METEOROLOGY, 2015, 2015
  • [27] A sustainability framework for assessing trade-offs in ecosystem services
    Cavender-Bares, Jeannine
    Polasky, Stephen
    King, Elizabeth
    Balvanera, Patricia
    [J]. ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2015, 20 (01):
  • [28] Trade-offs across space, time, and ecosystem services
    Rodriguez, Jon Paul
    Beard, T. Douglas, Jr.
    Bennett, Elena M.
    Cumming, Graeme S.
    Cork, Steven J.
    Agard, John
    Dobson, Andrew P.
    Peterson, Garry D.
    [J]. ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2006, 11 (01):
  • [29] Simulating the Impact of Future Climate Change and Ecological Restoration on Trade-Offs and Synergies of Ecosystem Services in Two Ecological Shelters and Three Belts in China
    Wang, Liang-Jie
    Ma, Shuai
    Qiao, Yong-Peng
    Zhang, Jin-Chi
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (21) : 1 - 26
  • [30] Ecosystem Services and Poverty Alleviation Trade-offs and Governance
    Bonacci, Ognjen
    [J]. HRVATSKE VODE, 2019, 27 (107) : 77 - 78