Potential supply and actual use of cultural ecosystem services in mountain protected areas and their surroundings

被引:26
|
作者
Crouzat, Emilie [1 ,2 ,3 ]
De Frutos, Angel [1 ,2 ,19 ]
Grescho, Volker [1 ,2 ]
Carver, Steve [5 ]
Bueermann, Andrea [1 ,2 ]
Carvalho-Santos, Claudia [1 ,4 ,15 ,16 ]
Kraemer, Roland [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Mayor, Sarah [1 ,2 ,7 ]
Poepperl, Franziska [17 ]
Rossi, Christian [9 ,10 ,11 ]
Schroeter, Matthias [8 ,20 ]
Stritih, Ana [12 ,13 ,15 ,16 ]
Vaz, Ana Sofia [14 ,18 ]
Watzema, Jan [1 ,2 ]
Bonn, Aletta [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] UFZ Helmholtz Ctr Environm Res, Dept Ecosyst Serv, Permoserstr 15, D-04318 Leipzig, Germany
[2] German Ctr Integrat Biodivers Res iDiv, Puschstr 4, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany
[3] Univ Grenoble Alpes, LESSEM, INRAE, 2 Rue Papeterie,BP 76, F-38402 St Martin Dheres, France
[4] Friedrich Schiller Univ, Inst Biodivers, Dornburger Str 159, D-07743 Jena, Germany
[5] Univ Leeds, Sch Geog, Woodhouse Lane, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
[6] Humboldt Univ, Geog Dept, Linden 6, D-10099 Berlin, Germany
[7] UFZ Helmholtz Ctr Environm Res, Dept Computat Landscape Ecol, Permoserstr 15, D-04318 Leipzig, Germany
[8] Univ Zurich, Dept Evolutionary Biol & Environm Studies, Winterthurerstr 190, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland
[9] Univ Zurich, Dept Geog, Remote Sensing Labs, Winterthurerstr 190, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland
[10] Swiss Fed Inst Forest Snow & Landscape Res WSL, Res Unit Community Ecol, Zurcherstr 111, CH-8903 Birmensdorf, Switzerland
[11] Swiss Natl Pk, CH-7530 Planta Wildenberg, Zernez, Switzerland
[12] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Inst Landscape & Spatial Dev, Planning Landscape & Urban Syst PLUS, Stefano Franscini Pl 5, CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland
[13] WSL Inst Snow & Avalanche Res SLF, Fluelastr 11, CH-7260 Davos, Switzerland
[14] Univ Porto, Res Ctr Biodivers & Genet Resources InBIO CIBIO, Res Network Biodivers & Evolutionary Biol, Rua Padre Armando Quintas,Campus Vairao, P-4485661 Vila Do Conde, Portugal
[15] Univ Minho, Ctr Mol & Environm Biol CBMA, Campus Gualtar, P-4710057 Braga, Portugal
[16] Univ Minho, Inst Biosustainabil IB S, Campus Gualtar, P-4710057 Braga, Portugal
[17] Tech Univ Munich, Sch Life Sci, Ecosyst Dynam & Forest Management Grp, Hans Carl Von Carlowitz Pl 2, D-85354 Freising Weihenstephan, Germany
[18] Univ Granada, Andalusian Interuniv Inst Earth Syst Res IISTA CE, iEcolab, Avda Mediterraneo, Granada 18006, Spain
[19] Univ Jaume 1, Campus Riu Sec, Castellon de La Plana 12071, Spain
[20] Leuphana Univ Luneburg, Fac Sustainabil, Social Ecol Syst Inst, Univ Allee 1, D-21335 Luneburg, Germany
关键词
Germany; Cultural ecosystem service; Potential supply; Actual use; Participatory mapping; Protected area; Expert knowledge elicitation; NATIONAL-PARKS; SOCIAL MEDIA; OUTDOOR RECREATION; VALUES; INDICATORS; FRAMEWORK; CAPACITY; FLOW; CHALLENGES; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101395
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The potential supply of ecosystem services is often assessed using land cover data. Assessment of actual use of ecosystem services by beneficiaries remains less covered and is often assumed to be congruent with potential supply. However, we believe that to contribute to the sustainable management of multifunctional landscapes, more insights are needed on the links between landscape characteristics and the various facets of ecosystem services. In this paper, we assess cultural ecosystem services (CES) such as recreation, inspiration or scenic beauty in three European mountain protected areas and their surroundings. We study the alignment between the potential supply and actual use of CES. CES potential supply was modelled using six biophysical indicators derived from earth observation and open geospatial data. For CES actual use, we employed participatory mapping with protected area visitors and local experts. We modelled CES actual use as a function of landscape biophysical indicators, weighted by (i) stated and (ii) revealed visitor preferences, and accessibility in each protected area using generalized additive mixed-effects models. Accessibility alone could explain around 50% of the variability of CES actual use, and with the additional inclusion of the 'natural and cultural features' variable, the actual use models reached an explanatory power of around 80% for all three case-studies. Importantly, biophysical information using land cover data alone cannot fully describe CES actual use, and there was little congruency between modelled potential supply and actual use. Additional socio-cultural features are required to explain the patterns of locations where protected area visitors enjoy CES. Our results can inform visitor management by addressing CES actual use and thereby provide evidence for landscape management and con-servation planning and management, including offering a rewarding experience of nature for visitors.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Representation of Ecosystem Services by Terrestrial Protected Areas: Chile as a Case Study
    Duran, America P.
    Casalegno, Stefano
    Marquet, Pablo A.
    Gaston, Kevin J.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (12):
  • [42] Ecosystem services in European protected areas: Ambiguity in the views of scientists and managers?
    Hummel, Christiaan
    Provenzale, Antonello
    van der Meer, Jaap
    Wijnhoven, Sander
    Nolte, Arno
    Poursanidis, Dimitris
    Janss, Guyonne
    Jurek, Matthias
    Andresen, Magnus
    Poulin, Brigitte
    Kobler, Johannes
    Beierkuhnlein, Carl
    Honrado, Joao
    Razinkovas, Arturas
    Stritih, Ana
    Bargmann, Tessa
    Ziemba, Alex
    Bonet-Garcia, Francisco
    Adamescu, Mihai Cristian
    Janssen, Gerard
    Hummel, Herman
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (11):
  • [43] Assessment of the Ecosystem Services Capacity in Natural Protected Areas for Biodiversity Conservation
    Ronchi, Silvia
    Salata, Stefano
    [J]. WORLD MULTIDISCIPLINARY CIVIL ENGINEERING-ARCHITECTURE-URBAN PLANNING SYMPOSIUM - WMCAUS, 2017, 245
  • [44] Assessment of the effectiveness of China's protected areas in enhancing ecosystem services
    Yu, Chaoyue
    Zhang, Zhonghao
    Jeppesen, Erik
    Gao, Yang
    Liu, Yuexin
    Liu, Yongjie
    Lu, Qingling
    Wang, Chenxu
    Sun, Ximan
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2024, 65
  • [45] The implications of global priorities for biodiversity and ecosystem services associated with protected areas
    Pyke, Christopher R.
    [J]. ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2007, 12 (01):
  • [46] Modeling risks in marine protected areas: Mapping of habitats, biodiversity, and cultural ecosystem services in the southernmost atlantic coral reef
    Niz, Willians C.
    Laurino, Ivan R. A.
    de Freitas, Debora M.
    Rolim, Fernanda A.
    Motta, Fabio S.
    Pereira-Filho, Guilherme H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2023, 345
  • [47] Functional approach in estimation of cultural ecosystem services of recreational areas
    Sautkin, I. S.
    Rogova, T. V.
    [J]. 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ENVIRONMENT AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF TERRITORIES: ECOLOGICAL CHALLENGES OF THE 21ST CENTURY, 2018, 107
  • [48] Identifying the Spatial Imbalance in the Supply and Demand of Cultural Ecosystem Services
    Shi, Qinqin
    Chen, Hai
    Liu, Di
    Geng, Tianwei
    Zhang, Hang
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (11)
  • [49] Identification of ecosystem services supply and demand areas and simulation of ecosystem service flows in Shanghai
    Shi, Yishao
    Shi, Donghui
    Zhou, Liangliang
    Fang, Ruibo
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2020, 115
  • [50] Recreational potential as an indicator of accessibility control in protected mountain forest areas
    Tomasz Dudek
    [J]. Journal of Mountain Science, 2017, 14 : 1419 - 1427