Representation of Ecosystem Services by Terrestrial Protected Areas: Chile as a Case Study

被引:39
|
作者
Duran, America P. [1 ]
Casalegno, Stefano [1 ]
Marquet, Pablo A. [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Gaston, Kevin J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Exeter, Environm & Sustainabil Inst, Penryn, Cornwall, England
[2] Pontificia Univ Catolica Chile, Fac Ciencias Biol, Dept Ecol, Santiago, Chile
[3] IEB, Santiago, Chile
[4] Santa Fe Inst, Santa Fe, NM 87501 USA
[5] Pontificia Univ Catolica Chile, Fac Ciencias Biol, Lab Int Cambio Global LINCGlobal, Santiago, Chile
来源
PLOS ONE | 2013年 / 8卷 / 12期
关键词
CLIMATE-CHANGE; CONSERVATION; BIODIVERSITY; FRAMEWORK; SYSTEM; NDVI;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0082643
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Protected areas are increasingly considered to play a key role in the global maintenance of ecosystem processes and the ecosystem services they provide. It is thus vital to assess the extent to which existing protected area systems represent those services. Here, for the first time, we document the effectiveness of the current Chilean protected area system and its planned extensions in representing both ecosystem services (plant productivity, carbon storage and agricultural production) and biodiversity. Additionally, we evaluate the effectiveness of protected areas based on their respective management objectives. Our results show that existing protected areas in Chile do not contain an unusually high proportion of carbon storage (14.9%), agricultural production (0.2%) or biodiversity (11.8%), and also represent a low level of plant productivity (Normalized Difference Vegetation Index of 0.38). Proposed additional priority sites enhance the representation of ecosystem services and biodiversity, but not sufficiently to attain levels of representation higher than would be expected for their area of coverage. Moreover, when the species groups were assessed separately, amphibians was the only one well represented. Suggested priority sites for biodiversity conservation, without formal protection yet, was the only protected area category that over-represents carbon storage, agricultural production and biodiversity. The low representation of ecosystem services and species' distribution ranges by the current protected area system is because these protected areas are heavily biased toward southern Chile, and contain large extents of ice and bare rock. The designation and management of proposed priority sites needs to be addressed in order to increase the representation of ecosystem services within the Chilean protected area system.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Terrestrial protected areas: Understanding the spatial variation of potential and realized ecosystem services
    Aziz, Tariq
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2023, 326
  • [2] Ecosystem services and justice of protected areas: the case of Circeo National Park, Italy
    Benetti, Stefania
    Langemeyer, Johannes
    [J]. ECOSYSTEMS AND PEOPLE, 2021, 17 (01) : 411 - 431
  • [3] Terrestrial vegetation and ecosystem coverage within Indian protected areas
    Rawat, GS
    [J]. NATIONAL ACADEMY SCIENCE LETTERS-INDIA, 2005, 28 (7-8): : 241 - 250
  • [4] Strengthening protected areas for biodiversity and ecosystem services in China
    Xu, Weihua
    Xiao, Yi
    Zhang, Jingjing
    Yang, Wu
    Zhang, Lu
    Hull, Vanessa
    Wang, Zhi
    Zheng, Hua
    Liu, Jianguo
    Polasky, Stephen
    Jiang, Ling
    Xiao, Yang
    Shi, Xuewei
    Rao, Enming
    Lu, Fei
    Wang, Xiaoke
    Daily, Gretchen C.
    Ouyang, Zhiyun
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2017, 114 (07) : 1601 - 1606
  • [5] Ecosystem Services, Sustainable Rural Development and Protected Areas
    de Castro-Pardo, Monica
    Azevedo, Joao C.
    Fernandez, Pascual
    [J]. LAND, 2021, 10 (10)
  • [6] Sociocultural valuation of ecosystem services in protected areas: A study applied to Southeast Spain
    Lopez-Felices, Belen
    Schoenemann, Marina
    Roman-Sanchez, Isabel M.
    Aznar-Sanchez, Jose A.
    [J]. OECONOMIA COPERNICANA, 2023, 14 (04) : 1257 - 1302
  • [7] Integrating payment for ecosystem services in protected areas governance: The case of the Po Delta Park
    Gaglio, M.
    Lanzoni, M.
    Goggi, F.
    Fano, E. A.
    Castaldelli, G.
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2023, 60
  • [8] The Economic Valuation of Ecosystem Services: Economic Value-Based Management in a Case Study of Protected Areas in Iran
    Zandebasiri, Mehdi
    Azadi, Hossein
    Shirmardi, Hamzehali
    Goujani, Hassan Jahanbazi
    Iranmanesh, Yaghoub
    Shamsoddini, Shahbaz
    Fakhimi, Elham
    Mokhtarpour, Touraj
    Gholipour, Zeinab
    Viira, Ants-Hannes
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2023, 17 (04)
  • [9] ECONOMIC ESTIMATION OF CARBON STORAGE AND SEQUESTRATION AS ECOSYSTEM SERVICES OF PROTECTED AREAS: A CASE STUDY OF LOBEKE NATIONAL PARK
    Zapfack, L.
    Noiha, N. V.
    Tabue, M. R. B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TROPICAL FOREST SCIENCE, 2016, 28 (04) : 406 - 415
  • [10] The Economic Valuation of Ecosystem Services: Economic Value-Based Management in a Case Study of Protected Areas in Iran
    Mehdi Zandebasiri
    Hossein Azadi
    Hamzehali Shirmardi
    Hassan Jahanbazi Goujani
    Yaghoub Iranmanesh
    Shahbaz Shamsoddini
    Elham Fakhimi
    Touraj Mokhtarpour
    Zeinab Gholipour
    Ants-Hannes Viira
    [J]. International Journal of Environmental Research, 2023, 17