Potential supply and actual use of cultural ecosystem services in mountain protected areas and their surroundings

被引:26
|
作者
Crouzat, Emilie [1 ,2 ,3 ]
De Frutos, Angel [1 ,2 ,19 ]
Grescho, Volker [1 ,2 ]
Carver, Steve [5 ]
Bueermann, Andrea [1 ,2 ]
Carvalho-Santos, Claudia [1 ,4 ,15 ,16 ]
Kraemer, Roland [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Mayor, Sarah [1 ,2 ,7 ]
Poepperl, Franziska [17 ]
Rossi, Christian [9 ,10 ,11 ]
Schroeter, Matthias [8 ,20 ]
Stritih, Ana [12 ,13 ,15 ,16 ]
Vaz, Ana Sofia [14 ,18 ]
Watzema, Jan [1 ,2 ]
Bonn, Aletta [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] UFZ Helmholtz Ctr Environm Res, Dept Ecosyst Serv, Permoserstr 15, D-04318 Leipzig, Germany
[2] German Ctr Integrat Biodivers Res iDiv, Puschstr 4, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany
[3] Univ Grenoble Alpes, LESSEM, INRAE, 2 Rue Papeterie,BP 76, F-38402 St Martin Dheres, France
[4] Friedrich Schiller Univ, Inst Biodivers, Dornburger Str 159, D-07743 Jena, Germany
[5] Univ Leeds, Sch Geog, Woodhouse Lane, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
[6] Humboldt Univ, Geog Dept, Linden 6, D-10099 Berlin, Germany
[7] UFZ Helmholtz Ctr Environm Res, Dept Computat Landscape Ecol, Permoserstr 15, D-04318 Leipzig, Germany
[8] Univ Zurich, Dept Evolutionary Biol & Environm Studies, Winterthurerstr 190, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland
[9] Univ Zurich, Dept Geog, Remote Sensing Labs, Winterthurerstr 190, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland
[10] Swiss Fed Inst Forest Snow & Landscape Res WSL, Res Unit Community Ecol, Zurcherstr 111, CH-8903 Birmensdorf, Switzerland
[11] Swiss Natl Pk, CH-7530 Planta Wildenberg, Zernez, Switzerland
[12] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Inst Landscape & Spatial Dev, Planning Landscape & Urban Syst PLUS, Stefano Franscini Pl 5, CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland
[13] WSL Inst Snow & Avalanche Res SLF, Fluelastr 11, CH-7260 Davos, Switzerland
[14] Univ Porto, Res Ctr Biodivers & Genet Resources InBIO CIBIO, Res Network Biodivers & Evolutionary Biol, Rua Padre Armando Quintas,Campus Vairao, P-4485661 Vila Do Conde, Portugal
[15] Univ Minho, Ctr Mol & Environm Biol CBMA, Campus Gualtar, P-4710057 Braga, Portugal
[16] Univ Minho, Inst Biosustainabil IB S, Campus Gualtar, P-4710057 Braga, Portugal
[17] Tech Univ Munich, Sch Life Sci, Ecosyst Dynam & Forest Management Grp, Hans Carl Von Carlowitz Pl 2, D-85354 Freising Weihenstephan, Germany
[18] Univ Granada, Andalusian Interuniv Inst Earth Syst Res IISTA CE, iEcolab, Avda Mediterraneo, Granada 18006, Spain
[19] Univ Jaume 1, Campus Riu Sec, Castellon de La Plana 12071, Spain
[20] Leuphana Univ Luneburg, Fac Sustainabil, Social Ecol Syst Inst, Univ Allee 1, D-21335 Luneburg, Germany
关键词
Germany; Cultural ecosystem service; Potential supply; Actual use; Participatory mapping; Protected area; Expert knowledge elicitation; NATIONAL-PARKS; SOCIAL MEDIA; OUTDOOR RECREATION; VALUES; INDICATORS; FRAMEWORK; CAPACITY; FLOW; CHALLENGES; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101395
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The potential supply of ecosystem services is often assessed using land cover data. Assessment of actual use of ecosystem services by beneficiaries remains less covered and is often assumed to be congruent with potential supply. However, we believe that to contribute to the sustainable management of multifunctional landscapes, more insights are needed on the links between landscape characteristics and the various facets of ecosystem services. In this paper, we assess cultural ecosystem services (CES) such as recreation, inspiration or scenic beauty in three European mountain protected areas and their surroundings. We study the alignment between the potential supply and actual use of CES. CES potential supply was modelled using six biophysical indicators derived from earth observation and open geospatial data. For CES actual use, we employed participatory mapping with protected area visitors and local experts. We modelled CES actual use as a function of landscape biophysical indicators, weighted by (i) stated and (ii) revealed visitor preferences, and accessibility in each protected area using generalized additive mixed-effects models. Accessibility alone could explain around 50% of the variability of CES actual use, and with the additional inclusion of the 'natural and cultural features' variable, the actual use models reached an explanatory power of around 80% for all three case-studies. Importantly, biophysical information using land cover data alone cannot fully describe CES actual use, and there was little congruency between modelled potential supply and actual use. Additional socio-cultural features are required to explain the patterns of locations where protected area visitors enjoy CES. Our results can inform visitor management by addressing CES actual use and thereby provide evidence for landscape management and con-servation planning and management, including offering a rewarding experience of nature for visitors.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Understanding land use change impacts on ecosystem services within urban protected areas
    Petroni, Maria Luiza
    Siqueira-Gay, Juliana
    Casteli Figueiredo Gallardo, Amarilis Lucia
    [J]. LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2022, 223
  • [22] Effects of land tenure and protected areas on ecosystem services and land use preferences in Norway
    Hausner, Vera Helene
    Brown, Greg
    Laegreid, Eiliv
    [J]. LAND USE POLICY, 2015, 49 : 446 - 461
  • [23] Cultural ecosystem services in mountain regions: Conceptualising conflicts among users and limitations of use
    Schirpke, Uta
    Scolozzi, Rocco
    Dean, Graeme
    Haller, Andreas
    Jaeger, Hieronymus
    Kister, Jutta
    Kovacs, Barbara
    Sarmiento, Fausto O.
    Sattler, Birgit
    Schleyer, Christian
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2020, 46
  • [24] Mapping potential surpluses, deficits, and mismatches of ecosystem services supply and demand for urban areas
    Vargas, Leonardo
    Ruiz, Diana
    Gomez-Navarro, Carolina
    Ramirez, Wilson
    Lucia Hernandez, Olga
    [J]. URBAN ECOSYSTEMS, 2023, 26 (03) : 701 - 711
  • [25] Mapping potential surpluses, deficits, and mismatches of ecosystem services supply and demand for urban areas
    Leonardo Vargas
    Diana Ruiz
    Carolina Gómez-Navarro
    Wilson Ramirez
    Olga Lucia Hernandez
    [J]. Urban Ecosystems, 2023, 26 : 701 - 711
  • [26] Mapping ecosystem services in protected areas. A systematic review
    Kalinauskas, Marius
    Shuhani, Yuliana
    Pinto, Luis Valenta
    Inacio, Miguel
    Pereira, Paulo
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 912
  • [27] Strengthening protected areas for giant panda habitat and ecosystem services
    Zhang, Jingjing
    Xu, Weihua
    Kong, Lingqiao
    Hull, Vanessa
    Xiao, Yi
    Xiao, Yang
    Ouyang, Zhiyun
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2018, 227 : 1 - 8
  • [28] Hidden roles of protected areas in the conservation of biodiversity and ecosystem services
    Vina, Andres
    Liu, Jianguo
    [J]. ECOSPHERE, 2017, 8 (06):
  • [29] MARCHI: A serious game for participatory governance of ecosystem services in multiple-use protected areas
    Laterra, Pedro
    Weyland, Federico
    Auer, Alejandra
    Barral, Paula
    Gonzalez, Aira
    Mastrangelo, Matias
    Rositano, Florencia
    Sirimarco, Ximena
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2023, 63
  • [30] Mapping and analysing cultural ecosystem services in conflict areas
    Santarem, Frederico
    Saarinen, Jarkko
    Brito, Jose Carlos
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2020, 110