Mapping ecosystem services in protected areas. A systematic review

被引:2
|
作者
Kalinauskas, Marius [1 ]
Shuhani, Yuliana [1 ]
Pinto, Luis Valenta [1 ,2 ]
Inacio, Miguel [1 ]
Pereira, Paulo [1 ]
机构
[1] Mykolas Romeris Univ, Environm Management LAB, Vilnius, Lithuania
[2] Polytech Inst Coimbra, Res Ctr Nat Resources Environm & Soc CERNAS, Coimbra Agrarian Tech Sch, Coimbra, Portugal
关键词
Systematic literature review; Prisma; Mapping; Protected areas; Ecosystem services; NATIONAL-PARKS; SOCIAL VALUES; TRADE-OFFS; MANAGEMENT CATEGORIES; SOIL CARBON; LAND-USE; CONSERVATION; BIODIVERSITY; FOREST; OPPORTUNITIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.169248
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Protected areas (PAs) supply ecosystem services (ES) essential for human wellbeing. Mapping is a critical exercise that allows an understanding of the spatial distribution of the different ES in PAs. This work aims to conduct a systematic literature review on mapping ES in PAs. In order to carry out this systematic review, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses method was applied. The results showed an increase in the number of works between 2012 and 2023, and they were especially conducted in Europe and Asia and less in North America, South America, and Oceania. Most studies were developed in terrestrial areas, and the International Union for Conservation of Nature classified them into types II and IV. Most of the works followed the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment classification and were mainly focused on the supply dimension. Regulating and maintenance and cultural ES were the most mapped dimensions in PAs. The most frequent provisioning ES mapped in PAs were Animals reared for nutritional purposes and Cultivated terrestrial plants grown for nutritional purposes. In regulating and maintenance, Maintaining nursery populations and habitats and Regulation of the chemical composition of the atmosphere and oceans were the most analysed. For cultural ES, Characteristics of living systems that enable activities promoting health, recuperation, or enjoyment through active or immersive interactions and Characteristics of living systems that enable aesthetic experiences were the most mapped ES in PAs. Most works followed a quantitative approach, although the number of qualitative studies is high. Finally, most of the works needed to be validated, which may hamper the credibility of mapping ES in PAs. Overall, this systematic review contributed to a global picture of studies distribution, the areas where they are needed, and the most popular dimensions and sections as the methodologies were applied.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Mapping ecosystem services in urban and peri-urban areas. A systematic review
    Pereira, Paulo
    Inacio, Miguel
    Pinto, Luis
    Kalinauskas, Marius
    Bogdzevic, Katarzyna
    Zhao, Wenwu
    [J]. GEOGRAPHY AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 5 (03) : 491 - 509
  • [2] Mapping lake ecosystem services: A systematic review
    Inacio, Miguel
    Barcelo, Damia
    Zhao, Wenwu
    Pereira, Paulo
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 847
  • [3] Mapping air filtering in urban areas. A Land Use Regression model for Ecosystem Services assessment in planning
    Salata, Stefano
    Ronchi, Silvia
    Arcidiacono, Andrea
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2017, 28 : 341 - 350
  • [4] Bridging theory and practice in ecosystem services mapping: a systematic review
    Bitoun R.E.
    Trégarot E.
    Devillers R.
    [J]. Environment Systems and Decisions, 2022, 42 (1) : 103 - 116
  • [5] Mapping and Evaluating Marine Protected Areas and Ecosystem Services: A Transdisciplinary Delphi Forecasting Process Framework
    Belgrano, Andrea
    Novaglio, Camilla
    Svedang, Henrik
    Villasante, Sebastian
    Melian, Carlos J.
    Blenckner, Thorsten
    Bergstrom, Ulf
    Bryhn, Andreas
    Bergstrom, Lena
    Bartolino, Valerio
    Skold, Mattias
    Tomczak, Maciej
    Wikstrom, Sofia A.
    Hansen, Andreas Skriver
    Linke, Sebastian
    Emmerson, Richard
    Morf, Andrea
    Tonnesson, Kajsa
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2021, 9
  • [6] Strengthening protected areas for biodiversity and ecosystem services in China
    Xu, Weihua
    Xiao, Yi
    Zhang, Jingjing
    Yang, Wu
    Zhang, Lu
    Hull, Vanessa
    Wang, Zhi
    Zheng, Hua
    Liu, Jianguo
    Polasky, Stephen
    Jiang, Ling
    Xiao, Yang
    Shi, Xuewei
    Rao, Enming
    Lu, Fei
    Wang, Xiaoke
    Daily, Gretchen C.
    Ouyang, Zhiyun
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2017, 114 (07) : 1601 - 1606
  • [7] Multiple criteria Bayesian analysis of adaptive ecosystem management and planning for protected areas.
    Prato, T
    Qiu, ZY
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2001, 26 (02): : 560 - 560
  • [8] Ecosystem Services, Sustainable Rural Development and Protected Areas
    de Castro-Pardo, Monica
    Azevedo, Joao C.
    Fernandez, Pascual
    [J]. LAND, 2021, 10 (10)
  • [9] The Contribution of Ecosystem Services in Developing Effective and Sustainable Management Practices in Marine Protected Areas. The Case Study of "Isola dell'Asinara"
    Floris, Maddalena
    Gazale, Vittorio
    Isola, Federica
    Leccis, Francesca
    Pinna, Salvatore
    Pira, Cheti
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (03)
  • [10] EU regulates mining in protected areas.
    不详
    [J]. STAHL UND EISEN, 2010, 130 (11): : 34 - 34