Grading Aortic Stenosis With Mean Gradient and Aortic Valve Area: A Comparison Between Preoperative Transthoracic and Precardiopulmonary Bypass Transesophageal Echocardiography

被引:12
|
作者
Whitener, George [1 ]
Sivak, Joseph [2 ]
Akushevich, Igor [3 ]
Samad, Zainab [2 ]
Swaminathan, Madhav [1 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Dept Anesthesiol, Durham, NC USA
[2] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Cardiol, Durham, NC USA
[3] Duke Univ, Social Sci Res Inst, Durham, NC USA
关键词
aortic stenosis; aortic valve area; discordance; mean gradient; precardiopulmonary bypass (intraoperative) transesophageal echocardiography; PARADOXICAL LOW-FLOW; EJECTION FRACTION; SEVERITY; GUIDELINES; DYNAMICS;
D O I
10.1053/j.jvca.2016.05.012
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Objective: The authors hypothesized that average precardiopulmonary bypass (pre-CPB) transesophageal echocardiographic (TEE) mean gradient (PG(m)) and aortic valve area (AVA) values would be significantly different from preoperative transthoracic (WE) values in the same patients and that these changes would affect pre-CPB TEE grading of aortic stenosis (AS). Design: Retrospective, observational design. Setting: Single university hospital. Participants: The study comprised 92 patients who underwent aortic valve replacement with or without coronary artery bypass grafting between 2000 and 2012 at Duke University Hospital and who had PGm and AVA values recorded in both pre-CPB TEE and preoperative TTE reporting databases. Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: PG(m) with pre-CPB TEE was lower by 6.6 mmHg (95% confidence interval, -4.0 to -9.3 mmHg; p < 0.001), whereas AVA was higher by 0.10 cm(2) (95% confidence interval, 0.04 to 0.15 cm(2); p < 0.001), compared with preoperative TTE values. When using PG(m), pre-CPB TEE generated an AS severity 1 grade lower 39.1% of the time and revealed no difference 55.4% of the time compared to preoperative TTE. When using AVA by continuity, pre-CPB TEE generated an AS severity 1 grade lower 14.1% of the time and revealed no difference 81.5% of the time compared to preoperative TTE. When using either PGm or AVA, preoperative TTE exhibited moderate or severe AS for all study patients, whereas, pre-CPB TEE demonstrated mild AS in 5.4% (n = 92) of patients. Conclusions: The authors confirmed their hypothesis that pre-CPB TEE generates different PG(m) and AVA values compared with preoperative TTE. These differences often underestimate AS severity. Hemodynamic standardizations or adjustments of pre-CPB TEE PG(m) and AVA values may be necessary in anesthetized patients before assigning an AS grade using these parameters. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1254 / 1259
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] DETERMINATION OF AORTIC-VALVE ORIFICE AREA IN AORTIC-VALVE STENOSIS BY TWO-DIMENSIONAL TRANSESOPHAGEAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY
    HOFMANN, T
    KASPER, W
    MEINERTZ, T
    SPILLNER, G
    SCHLOSSER, V
    JUST, H
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1987, 59 (04): : 330 - 335
  • [22] The evaluation of aortic atherosclerosis and distensibility in aortic valve stenosis -: The role of transesophageal echocardiography
    Nemes, A
    Forster, T
    Csanády, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2005, 130 (05): : 1483 - 1484
  • [23] Usefulness of intraoperative epiaortic echocardiography to resolve discrepancy between transthoracic and transesophageal measurements of aortic valve gradient - a case report
    Edrich, T
    Shernan, SK
    Smith, B
    Eltzschig, HK
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 2003, 50 (03): : 293 - 296
  • [24] DETERMINATION OF AORTIC-VALVE ORIFICE AREA IN AORTIC-STENOSIS WITH 2D TRANSESOPHAGEAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY
    HOFMANN, T
    KASPER, W
    GEIBEL, A
    KOESTER, W
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 1986, 74 (04) : 391 - 391
  • [25] Aortic valve area on 64-slice computed tomography strongly correlates with transesophageal echocardiography in aortic stenosis
    LaBounty, Troy
    Sundaram, Baskaran
    Agarwal, Prachi
    Armstrong, William
    Kazerooni, Ella A.
    Yamada, Elma
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2007, 116 (16) : 611 - 611
  • [26] REPLY: Comparison of Echocardiography and CT for the Assessment of Aortic Stenosis Valve Area
    Clavel, Marie-Annick
    Malouf, Joseph
    Messika-Zeitoun, David
    Araoz, Phillip A.
    Michelena, Hector I.
    Enriquez-Sarano, Maurice
    [J]. JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2015, 8 (09) : 1116 - 1116
  • [27] Comparison of transesophageal and transthoracic echocardiography under moderate sedation for guiding transcatheter aortic valve replacement
    Sherifi I.
    Omar A.M.S.
    Varghese M.
    Weiner M.
    Anyanwu A.
    Kovacic J.C.
    Sharma S.
    Kini A.
    Sengupta P.P.
    [J]. Echo Research & Practice, 2018, 5 (2): : 79 - 87
  • [28] Aortic valve morphology definition with transthoracic combined with transesophageal echocardiography in a population with high prevalence of bicuspid aortic valve
    Alegret, J
    Palazón, O
    Duran, I
    Vernis, J
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2005, 21 (2-3): : 213 - 217
  • [29] Aortic valve morphology definition with transthoracic combined with transesophageal echocardiography in a population with high prevalence of bicuspid aortic valve
    Josep M. Alegret
    Oscar Palazón
    Ignasi Duran
    Josep M. Vernis
    [J]. The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, 2005, 21 : 213 - 217
  • [30] Aortic Valve Area Calculation in Aortic Stenosis by CT and Doppler Echocardiography
    Clavel, Marie-Annick
    Malouf, Joseph
    Messika-Zeitoun, David
    Araoz, Phillip A.
    Michelena, Hector I.
    Enriquez-Sarano, Maurice
    [J]. JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2015, 8 (03) : 248 - 257