Grading Aortic Stenosis With Mean Gradient and Aortic Valve Area: A Comparison Between Preoperative Transthoracic and Precardiopulmonary Bypass Transesophageal Echocardiography

被引:12
|
作者
Whitener, George [1 ]
Sivak, Joseph [2 ]
Akushevich, Igor [3 ]
Samad, Zainab [2 ]
Swaminathan, Madhav [1 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Dept Anesthesiol, Durham, NC USA
[2] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Cardiol, Durham, NC USA
[3] Duke Univ, Social Sci Res Inst, Durham, NC USA
关键词
aortic stenosis; aortic valve area; discordance; mean gradient; precardiopulmonary bypass (intraoperative) transesophageal echocardiography; PARADOXICAL LOW-FLOW; EJECTION FRACTION; SEVERITY; GUIDELINES; DYNAMICS;
D O I
10.1053/j.jvca.2016.05.012
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Objective: The authors hypothesized that average precardiopulmonary bypass (pre-CPB) transesophageal echocardiographic (TEE) mean gradient (PG(m)) and aortic valve area (AVA) values would be significantly different from preoperative transthoracic (WE) values in the same patients and that these changes would affect pre-CPB TEE grading of aortic stenosis (AS). Design: Retrospective, observational design. Setting: Single university hospital. Participants: The study comprised 92 patients who underwent aortic valve replacement with or without coronary artery bypass grafting between 2000 and 2012 at Duke University Hospital and who had PGm and AVA values recorded in both pre-CPB TEE and preoperative TTE reporting databases. Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: PG(m) with pre-CPB TEE was lower by 6.6 mmHg (95% confidence interval, -4.0 to -9.3 mmHg; p < 0.001), whereas AVA was higher by 0.10 cm(2) (95% confidence interval, 0.04 to 0.15 cm(2); p < 0.001), compared with preoperative TTE values. When using PG(m), pre-CPB TEE generated an AS severity 1 grade lower 39.1% of the time and revealed no difference 55.4% of the time compared to preoperative TTE. When using AVA by continuity, pre-CPB TEE generated an AS severity 1 grade lower 14.1% of the time and revealed no difference 81.5% of the time compared to preoperative TTE. When using either PGm or AVA, preoperative TTE exhibited moderate or severe AS for all study patients, whereas, pre-CPB TEE demonstrated mild AS in 5.4% (n = 92) of patients. Conclusions: The authors confirmed their hypothesis that pre-CPB TEE generates different PG(m) and AVA values compared with preoperative TTE. These differences often underestimate AS severity. Hemodynamic standardizations or adjustments of pre-CPB TEE PG(m) and AVA values may be necessary in anesthetized patients before assigning an AS grade using these parameters. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1254 / 1259
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Overestimation of aortic valve gradient measured by Doppler echocardiography in patients with aortic stenosis
    Sakthi, C
    Yee, H
    Kotlewski, A
    [J]. CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2005, 65 (02) : 176 - 179
  • [42] Standard Transthoracic Echocardiography Examination in Patients with Degenerative Stenosis of the Aortic Valve
    Hagendorff, A.
    Stoebe, S.
    Tarr, A.
    Pfeiffer, D.
    [J]. ULTRASCHALL IN DER MEDIZIN, 2012, 33 (06): : 520 - 543
  • [43] Poor Agreement Between Preoperative Transthoracic Echocardiography and Intraoperative Transesophageal Echocardiography for Grading Diastolic Dysfunction
    Mcilroy, David R.
    Wettig, Pagen
    Burton, Jedidah
    Neylan, Aimee
    French, Benjamin
    Lin, Enjarn
    Hastings, Stuart
    Waldron, Benedict J. F.
    Buckland, Mark R.
    Myles, Paul S.
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2024, 138 (01): : 123 - 133
  • [44] Planimetry of the aortic valve by transthoracic echocardiography is a feasible and reproducible method for assessing the severity of aortic stenosis
    Brasch, AV
    Luo, HA
    Khan, SS
    DeRobertis, MA
    Siegel, RJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2000, 35 (02) : 535A - 535A
  • [45] Comparison of transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography for transcatheter aortic valve replacement sizing in high-risk patients
    Fox, Henrik
    Hemmann, Katrin
    Lehmann, Ralf
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, 2020, 18 (01) : 47 - 56
  • [46] Comparison of transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography for transcatheter aortic valve replacement sizing in high-risk patients
    Henrik Fox
    Katrin Hemmann
    Ralf Lehmann
    [J]. Journal of Echocardiography, 2020, 18 : 47 - 56
  • [47] Comparison between cardiovascular magnetic resonance and transthoracic doppler echocardiography for the estimation of effective orifice area in aortic stenosis
    Julio Garcia
    Lyes Kadem
    Eric Larose
    Marie-Annick Clavel
    Philippe Pibarot
    [J]. Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 13
  • [48] Comparison of multiplane and biplane transesophageal echocardiography in the assessment of aortic stenosis
    Kim, KS
    Maxted, W
    Nanda, NC
    Coggins, K
    Roychoudhry, D
    Espinal, M
    Fan, PH
    Camino, A
    Sanyal, R
    Finch, A
    Kirklin, J
    Pacifico, A
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1997, 79 (04): : 436 - 441
  • [49] Assessment of aortic valve area in aortic stenosis using cardiac magnetic resonance tomography: Comparison with echocardiography
    Malyar, Nasser M.
    Schlosser, Thomas
    Barkhausen, Joerg
    Gutersohn, Achim
    Buck, Thomas
    Bartel, Thomas
    Erbel, Raimund
    [J]. CARDIOLOGY, 2008, 109 (02) : 126 - 134
  • [50] Another Use for Transesophageal Echocardiography During Aortic Valve Bypass Surgery
    Wilson, Justin W.
    Bick, Julian
    Thompson, Annemarie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2013, 27 (03) : E22 - E23