Social-ecological enabling conditions for payments for ecosystem services

被引:32
|
作者
Huber-Stearns, Heidi R. [1 ]
Bennett, Drew E. [2 ]
Posner, Stephen [3 ]
Richards, Ryan C. [4 ,5 ]
Fair, Jenn Hoyle [6 ]
Cousins, Stella J. M. [7 ]
Romulo, Chelsie L. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oregon, Inst Sustainable Environm, Eugene, OR 97403 USA
[2] Colorado State Univ, Warner Coll Nat Resources, Dept Fish Wildlife & Conservat Biol, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[3] Univ Vermont, Gund Inst Ecol Econ, Rubenstein Sch Environm & Nat Resources, Burlington, VT 05405 USA
[4] George Mason Univ, Dept Environm Sci & Policy, Fairfax, VA 22030 USA
[5] Smithsonian Conservat Biol Inst, Ctr Conservat & Sustainabil, Front Royal, VA USA
[6] Yale Sch Forestry & Environm Studies, New Haven, CT USA
[7] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Environm Sci Policy & Management, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
来源
ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY | 2017年 / 22卷 / 01期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
content analysis; enabling conditions; environmental governance; environmental synthesis; payments for ecosystem services; social-ecological systems; ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES; WATERSHED SERVICES; PUBLIC-POLICY; DESIGNING PAYMENTS; DECISION-MAKING; GOVERNANCE; BIODIVERSITY; FRAMEWORK; LESSONS; SUSTAINABILITY;
D O I
10.5751/ES-08979-220118
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The concept of "enabling conditions" centers on conditions that facilitate approaches to addressing social and ecological challenges. Although multiple fields have independently addressed the concept of enabling conditions, the literature lacks a shared understanding or integration of concepts. We propose a more synthesized understanding of enabling conditions beyond disciplinary boundaries by focusing on the enabling conditions that influence the implementation of a range of environmental policies termed payments for ecosystem services (PES). Through an analysis of key literature from different disciplinary perspectives, we examined how researchers and practitioners refer to and identify enabling conditions within the context of PES. Through our synthesis, we identified 24 distinct enabling conditions organized within 4 broad themes: biophysical, economic, governance, and social-cultural conditions. We found that the literature coalesces around certain enabling conditions, such as strong ecosystem science and existing institutions, regardless of disciplinary background or journal audience. We also observed key differences in how authors perceive the direction of influence for property type, program objectives, and number of actors. Additionally, we noted an emphasis on the importance of the contextual nature of many enabling conditions that may cause certain conditions to have a disproportionate impact on successful implementation in some circumstances. Unraveling the relative importance of specific enabling conditions in diverse contexts remains a research frontier. Ultimately, no single disciplinary perspective is likely to provide all necessary insights for PES creation, and given the intertwined nature of enabling conditions, practitioners need to consider insights from multiple dimensions. Our work suggests opportunities to better connect diverse conversations through integration of concepts, a common vocabulary, and a synthetic framework.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Integrating multiple perspectives on payments for ecosystem services through a social-ecological systems framework
    Bennett, Drew E.
    Gosnell, Hannah
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2015, 116 : 172 - 181
  • [2] Getting the measure of ecosystem services: a social-ecological approach
    Reyers, Belinda
    Biggs, Reinette
    Cumming, Graeme S.
    Elmqvist, Thomas
    Hejnowicz, Adam P.
    Polasky, Stephen
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 11 (05) : 268 - 273
  • [3] Conceptualizing ecosystem services using social-ecological networks
    Felipe-Lucia, Maria R.
    Guerrero, Angela M.
    Alexander, Steven M.
    Ashander, Jaime
    Baggio, Jacopo A.
    Barnes, Michele L.
    Bodin, Orjan
    Bonn, Aletta
    Fortin, Marie-Josee
    Friedman, Rachel S.
    Gephart, Jessica A.
    Helmstedt, Kate J.
    Keyes, Aislyn A.
    Kroetz, Kailin
    Massol, Francois
    Pocock, Michael J. O.
    Sayles, Jesse
    Thompson, Ross M.
    Wood, Spencer A.
    Dee, Laura E.
    [J]. TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2022, 37 (03) : 211 - 222
  • [4] Multi-level social-ecological networks in a payments for ecosystem services programme in central Veracruz, Mexico
    Langle-Flores, Alfonso
    Aguilar Rodriguez, Adriana
    Romero-Uribe, Humberto
    Ros-Cuellar, Julia
    Von Thaden, Juan Jose
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, 2021, 48 (01) : 41 - 47
  • [5] Measuring social-ecological dynamics behind the generation of ecosystem services
    Andersson, E.
    Barthel, S.
    Ahrne, K.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2007, 17 (05) : 1267 - 1278
  • [6] Principles for Building Resilience: Sustaining Ecosystem Services in Social-Ecological Systems
    Mullenite, Joshua
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIETY-ADVANCES IN RESEARCH, 2016, 7 (01): : 134 - 136
  • [7] Analysis and management of multiple ecosystem services within a social-ecological context
    Rova, Silvia
    Pranovi, Fabio
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2017, 72 : 436 - 443
  • [8] Biocultural restoration improves delivery of ecosystem services in social-ecological landscapes
    Sena, Pedro H. A.
    Goncalves-Souza, Thiago
    Goncalves, Paulo H. S.
    Ferreira, Paulo S. M.
    Gusmao, Reginaldo A. F.
    Melo, Felipe P. L.
    [J]. RESTORATION ECOLOGY, 2022, 30 (05)
  • [9] A social-ecological approach to managing multiple agro-ecosystem services
    Lescourret, Francoise
    Magda, Daniele
    Richard, Guy
    Adam-Blondon, Anne-Francoise
    Bardy, Marion
    Baudry, Jacques
    Doussan, Isabelle
    Dumont, Bertrand
    Lefevre, Francois
    Litrico, Isabelle
    Martin-Clouaire, Roger
    Montuelle, Bernard
    Pellerin, Sylvain
    Plantegenest, Manuel
    Tancoigne, Elise
    Thomas, Alban
    Guyomard, Herve
    Soussana, Jean-Francois
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2015, 14 : 68 - 75