Biocultural restoration improves delivery of ecosystem services in social-ecological landscapes

被引:10
|
作者
Sena, Pedro H. A. [1 ,2 ]
Goncalves-Souza, Thiago [2 ]
Goncalves, Paulo H. S. [3 ]
Ferreira, Paulo S. M. [4 ]
Gusmao, Reginaldo A. F. [2 ]
Melo, Felipe P. L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Pernambuco, Ctr Biociencias, Lab Ecol Aplicada, Av Prof Moraes Rego SN, BR-50670901 Recife, PE, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Rural Pernambuco, Dept Biol, Lab Sintese Ecol & Conservacao Biodiversidade, BR-52171900 Recife, PE, Brazil
[3] Univ Fed Pernambuco, Dept Bot, Lab Ecol & Evolucao Sistemas Socioecol, Av Prof Moraes Rego SN, BR-50670901 Recife, PE, Brazil
[4] Univ Fed Ceara, Programa Posgrad Ecol & Recursos Nat, BR-60020181 Fortaleza, Ceara, Brazil
关键词
benefits from biodiversity; ecology; ethnobotany; forest and landscape restoration; indigenous and local knowledge; participatory forest restoration; TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE; FUNCTIONAL DIVERSITY; PLANT DOMESTICATION; FOREST; BIODIVERSITY; PHYLOGENIES; FUELWOOD; FUTURE;
D O I
10.1111/rec.13599
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Increasing local people and indigenous communities' participation on restoration programs is widely recommended as a way to increase restoration long-term benefits and local people's commitment with restored lands. Here, we demonstrate how traditional knowledge can provide crucial information on usefulness of plant species that increases direct value of forest and landscape restoration programs. Our study analyzed secondary data from 73 studies that assessed indigenous and local knowledge regarding plant's utility across the densely populated dry forest of the Brazilian Caatinga. Our results suggest that highly valued plants represent a relatively small number of useful species (52 out of 632 useful species) that account for more than half of the plant services (i.e. functional space represented by the uses people give to plants). Interestingly, these plants belonged to closely related lineages, suggesting that people must select plants based on phylogenetically conserved traits that provide utility. We propose that accounting for indigenous and local knowledge in early phases of restoration process such as species selection can both maximize classical restoration targets (e.g. species diversity) and increase delivery of ecosystem services to forest-dependent people. Such an interdisciplinary integration moves us a step closer to ambitious targets set for global ecosystem restoration based on fair and inclusive participation of indigenous people and local communities.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Monitoring social-ecological networks for biodiversity and ecosystem services in human-dominated landscapes
    Firkowski, Carina Rauen
    Schwantes, Amanda M.
    Fortin, Marie-Josee
    Gonzalez, Andrew
    [J]. FACETS, 2021, 6 : 1670 - 1692
  • [2] Cultural ecosystem services provided by rivers across diverse social-ecological landscapes: A social media analysis
    Hale, Rebecca L.
    Cook, Elizabeth M.
    Beltran, Bray J.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2019, 107
  • [3] Mapping and characterizing ecosystem services of social-ecological production landscapes: case study of Noto, Japan
    Hashimoto, Shizuka
    Nakamura, Shogo
    Saito, Osamu
    Kohsaka, Ryo
    Kamiyama, Chiho
    Tomiyoshi, Mitsuyuki
    Kishioka, Tomoya
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE, 2015, 10 (02) : 257 - 273
  • [4] Getting the measure of ecosystem services: a social-ecological approach
    Reyers, Belinda
    Biggs, Reinette
    Cumming, Graeme S.
    Elmqvist, Thomas
    Hejnowicz, Adam P.
    Polasky, Stephen
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 11 (05) : 268 - 273
  • [5] Social-ecological enabling conditions for payments for ecosystem services
    Huber-Stearns, Heidi R.
    Bennett, Drew E.
    Posner, Stephen
    Richards, Ryan C.
    Fair, Jenn Hoyle
    Cousins, Stella J. M.
    Romulo, Chelsie L.
    [J]. ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2017, 22 (01):
  • [6] Conceptualizing ecosystem services using social-ecological networks
    Felipe-Lucia, Maria R.
    Guerrero, Angela M.
    Alexander, Steven M.
    Ashander, Jaime
    Baggio, Jacopo A.
    Barnes, Michele L.
    Bodin, Orjan
    Bonn, Aletta
    Fortin, Marie-Josee
    Friedman, Rachel S.
    Gephart, Jessica A.
    Helmstedt, Kate J.
    Keyes, Aislyn A.
    Kroetz, Kailin
    Massol, Francois
    Pocock, Michael J. O.
    Sayles, Jesse
    Thompson, Ross M.
    Wood, Spencer A.
    Dee, Laura E.
    [J]. TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2022, 37 (03) : 211 - 222
  • [7] Making the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration a Social-Ecological Endeavour
    Fischer, Joern
    Riechers, Maraja
    Loos, Jacqueline
    Martin-Lopez, Berta
    Temperton, Vicky M.
    [J]. TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2021, 36 (01) : 20 - 28
  • [8] Beyond ecology: ecosystem restoration as a process for social-ecological transformation
    Tedesco, Anazelia M.
    Lopez-Cubillos, Sofia
    Chazdon, Robin
    Rhodes, Jonathan R.
    Archibald, Carla L.
    Perez-Hammerle, Katharina-Victoria
    Brancalion, Pedro H. S.
    Wilson, Kerrie A.
    Oliveira, Mariana
    Correa, Diego F.
    Ota, Liz
    Morrison, Tiffany H.
    Possingham, Hugh P.
    Mills, Morena
    Santos, Fabiane C.
    Dean, Angela J.
    [J]. TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2023, 38 (07) : 643 - 653
  • [9] Measuring social-ecological dynamics behind the generation of ecosystem services
    Andersson, E.
    Barthel, S.
    Ahrne, K.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2007, 17 (05) : 1267 - 1278
  • [10] Assessment of the relationship between ecosystem services and human wellbeing in the social-ecological landscapes of Lefke Region in North Cyprus
    Gulay Cetinkaya Ciftcioglu
    [J]. Landscape Ecology, 2017, 32 : 897 - 913