Social-ecological enabling conditions for payments for ecosystem services

被引:32
|
作者
Huber-Stearns, Heidi R. [1 ]
Bennett, Drew E. [2 ]
Posner, Stephen [3 ]
Richards, Ryan C. [4 ,5 ]
Fair, Jenn Hoyle [6 ]
Cousins, Stella J. M. [7 ]
Romulo, Chelsie L. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oregon, Inst Sustainable Environm, Eugene, OR 97403 USA
[2] Colorado State Univ, Warner Coll Nat Resources, Dept Fish Wildlife & Conservat Biol, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[3] Univ Vermont, Gund Inst Ecol Econ, Rubenstein Sch Environm & Nat Resources, Burlington, VT 05405 USA
[4] George Mason Univ, Dept Environm Sci & Policy, Fairfax, VA 22030 USA
[5] Smithsonian Conservat Biol Inst, Ctr Conservat & Sustainabil, Front Royal, VA USA
[6] Yale Sch Forestry & Environm Studies, New Haven, CT USA
[7] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Environm Sci Policy & Management, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
来源
ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY | 2017年 / 22卷 / 01期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
content analysis; enabling conditions; environmental governance; environmental synthesis; payments for ecosystem services; social-ecological systems; ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES; WATERSHED SERVICES; PUBLIC-POLICY; DESIGNING PAYMENTS; DECISION-MAKING; GOVERNANCE; BIODIVERSITY; FRAMEWORK; LESSONS; SUSTAINABILITY;
D O I
10.5751/ES-08979-220118
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The concept of "enabling conditions" centers on conditions that facilitate approaches to addressing social and ecological challenges. Although multiple fields have independently addressed the concept of enabling conditions, the literature lacks a shared understanding or integration of concepts. We propose a more synthesized understanding of enabling conditions beyond disciplinary boundaries by focusing on the enabling conditions that influence the implementation of a range of environmental policies termed payments for ecosystem services (PES). Through an analysis of key literature from different disciplinary perspectives, we examined how researchers and practitioners refer to and identify enabling conditions within the context of PES. Through our synthesis, we identified 24 distinct enabling conditions organized within 4 broad themes: biophysical, economic, governance, and social-cultural conditions. We found that the literature coalesces around certain enabling conditions, such as strong ecosystem science and existing institutions, regardless of disciplinary background or journal audience. We also observed key differences in how authors perceive the direction of influence for property type, program objectives, and number of actors. Additionally, we noted an emphasis on the importance of the contextual nature of many enabling conditions that may cause certain conditions to have a disproportionate impact on successful implementation in some circumstances. Unraveling the relative importance of specific enabling conditions in diverse contexts remains a research frontier. Ultimately, no single disciplinary perspective is likely to provide all necessary insights for PES creation, and given the intertwined nature of enabling conditions, practitioners need to consider insights from multiple dimensions. Our work suggests opportunities to better connect diverse conversations through integration of concepts, a common vocabulary, and a synthetic framework.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Multi-scale and cross-scale assessments of social-ecological systems and their ecosystem services
    Scholes, R. J.
    Reyers, B.
    Biggs, R.
    Spierenburg, M. J.
    Duriappah, A.
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2013, 5 (01) : 16 - 25
  • [42] Social-Ecological Resilience and Adaptive Capacity in a Transboundary Ecosystem
    Johnson, Bradley B.
    Becker, Mimi Larsen
    [J]. SOCIETY & NATURAL RESOURCES, 2015, 28 (07) : 766 - 780
  • [43] A framework for integrating ecosystem services indicators into vulnerability and risk assessments of deltaic social-ecological systems
    Peng, Yuting
    Welden, Natalie
    Renaud, Fabrice G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2023, 326
  • [44] Woody plant species diversity as a predictor of ecosystem services in a social-ecological system of southwestern Ethiopia
    Shumi, Girma
    Rodrigues, Patricia
    Hanspach, Jan
    Haerdtle, Werner
    Hylander, Kristoffer
    Senbeta, Feyera
    Fischer, Joern
    Schultner, Jannik
    [J]. LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2021, 36 (02) : 373 - 391
  • [45] A social-ecological systems approach for the assessment of ecosystem services from beef production in the Canadian prairie
    Pogue, Sarah J.
    Krobel, Roland
    Janzen, H. Henry
    Alemu, Aklilu W.
    Beauchemin, Karen A.
    Little, Shannan
    Iravani, Majid
    de Souza, Danielle Maia
    McAllister, Tim A.
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2020, 45
  • [46] Ecosystem services in coupled social-ecological systems: Closing the cycle of service provision and societal feedback
    Nassl, Michael
    Loeffler, Joerg
    [J]. AMBIO, 2015, 44 (08) : 737 - 749
  • [47] Mapping and characterizing ecosystem services of social-ecological production landscapes: case study of Noto, Japan
    Hashimoto, Shizuka
    Nakamura, Shogo
    Saito, Osamu
    Kohsaka, Ryo
    Kamiyama, Chiho
    Tomiyoshi, Mitsuyuki
    Kishioka, Tomoya
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE, 2015, 10 (02) : 257 - 273
  • [48] A Resilience Framework for Chronic Exposures: Water Quality and Ecosystem Services in Coastal Social-Ecological Systems
    Merrill, Nathaniel H.
    Mulvaney, Kate K.
    Martin, David M.
    Chintala, Marnita M.
    Berry, Walter
    Gleason, Timothy R.
    Balogh, Stephen
    Humphries, Austin T.
    [J]. COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2018, 46 (04) : 242 - 258
  • [49] Can the ecosystem services concept help in enhancing the resilience of land-sea social-ecological systems?
    Zaucha, Jacek
    Conides, Alexis
    Klaoudatos, Dimitris
    Noren, Katja
    [J]. OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2016, 124 : 33 - 41
  • [50] Relationships between hydrological regime and ecosystem services supply in a Caribbean coastal wetland: a social-ecological approach
    Vilardy, Sandra P.
    Gonzalez, Jose A.
    Martin-Lopez, Berta
    Montes, Carlos
    [J]. HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL-JOURNAL DES SCIENCES HYDROLOGIQUES, 2011, 56 (08): : 1423 - 1435